1986 1 Scc100 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: 1986 1 scc100 Page 1 of about 305 results (2.487 seconds)State of Kerala Vs. M.Gopalan
Court : Kerala
..... forward construction co others v prabhat mandal regd m andheri others 1986 1 scc100 in that case the supreme court considered the scope and effect ..... w a no 704 of 2013 19 prabhat mandal regd andheri 1986 1 scc100 and it is held as follows the decision in forward construction ..... c no 24015 2011 dated1403 2013 appellants respondents no 1 3 and4in wpc 1 state of kerala rep by its chief secretary government .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNational Confederation Of Officers Association Of Central Public Secto ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
..... bench 21 forward construction co v prabhat mandal regd 1986 1 scc100 three judge bench 22 1989 supp 1 scc50425 part c was a final order in ..... the company was not liable to be questioned on any of 30 1986 1 scc26444 part e the grounds set out in the writ petition ..... bench central inland water transport corporation limited v brojo nath ganguly 1986 3 scc156 two judge bench 32 acb 45 part e preliminary .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA.Kuttralingam Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court : Chennai
..... a in forward construction co v prabhat mandal regd reported in 1986 1 scc100 it has been held as follows 2 public interest litigation is ..... on the basis of wild and reckless allegations made by individualsi i e busybodies having little or no interest in the proceedings ..... otherwise the petition is liable to be dismissed at the threshold i in ayaaubkhan noorkhan pathan vs state of maharashtra and others .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.Kanimohamed Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court : Chennai
..... to the following decisions a in forward construction co v prabhat mandal regd reported in 1986 1 scc100 it has been held as follows 2 public interest litigation is a comparatively recent ..... is taken on his representation no costs consequently connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed to 1 the district collector madurai district madurai 2 the tahsildar melur melur taluk madurai district .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMukesh Kapil Vs. Parag P Tripathi and ors
Court : Delhi
..... forward construction co and ors vs prabhat mandal regd andheri and ors 1986 1 scc100 the court held that an adjudication is conclusive and final not only ..... was modified on 02 11 2011 upon an application being moved i e i a no 9952 2001 in a a no 12 1996 the ..... clauses from the said agreement dated 01 10 2001 read as follows 1 that all the parties to the litigation mentioned above hereby confirm the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnnapoorna Agencies (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Court : Delhi
Reported in : [2004]141TAXMAN542(Delhi)
of chapter xx cagreement of transfer ade on 7 3 1986under section 269ud 1 the appropriate authority passed order on 15 was not required by law to file form no 37 1 and any bona fide mistake of law could not bind
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSunrise Associates Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : (2000)10SCC420
in h anraj case reported in 1986 1 scc 414 1986 scc tax 190 doubted the judgment in h anraj1 held correctness of the decision in h anraj case reported in 1986 1 scc 414 1986 scc tax 190 doubted the judgment
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJohnson and Johnson Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangaba ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : 1997(92)ELT23(SC); JT1997(10)SC737; (1997)9SCC681
schedule to the central excise tariff act 1985 5 of 1986 from the whole of the duty of excise leviable thereon subsequent notifications issued under section 5a of the act in 1995 we do not see any reason why we should take
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajiv Kochar Vs. R.S. Sharma and anr.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : JT2000(10)SC449; (2002)9SCC624
that the ratio of the decision in h anraj case 1986 1 scc 414 fully supported the contention of the states no costs delhi sales tax act 1975 sections 2 g 1 3 4 b n agrawal g s singhvi aftab alam
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTP.K. Shaji @ Thammanam Shaji Vs. State of Kerala
Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR2006SC100; 2005(2)ALD(Cri)955; 2005(85)DRJ486; [2006(1)JCR133(SC)]; JT2005(9)SC481; 2005(4)KLT856(SC); 2006(I)OLR(SC)76; (2005)13SCC283; 2006(1)LC33(SC)
laid down the correct law held in h anraj case 1986 1 scc 414 it was held that a sale of duty entitlement passbook depb provided for in the exim policy 1997 2002 under the foreign trade development and regulation act 1992
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT