Scdrc Court May 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Reliance Life Insurance Co. Ltd. Rep. by Its Branch Manager and An ...
Court: SCDRC
Decided on: May-15-2014
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The appeal is challenge to the order dated 23.04.2014 passed in CC 6/2013 by the District Forum, Guntur. 2. The facts of the case leading to filing of the appeal are that the respondents father obtained Life Insurance policy bearing no. 16638248 from the appellant insurance company for sum assured of Rs.3,75,000/- for the period commencing from 23.3.2010 till 23.03.2020 and the premium was payable half yearly @ Rs.12,500/-. The respondents father died on 14.5.2010. The respondent being nominee of his father for the sum assured in terms of the insurance policy, lodged claim with the appellant which repudiated the same on the ground that the insured suppressed his correct age at the time of obtaining the insurance policy. 3. Questioning the rationality of repudiation of his claim, the respondent filed the complaint before the District Forum and the appellant resisted the same on the ground that the insured submitted proposal form bearing N...
Akella Vishala and Another Vs. Sirigineedi Venkata Ramesh @ Geddam Ram ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: May-15-2014
Oral Order: (Thota Ashok Kumar, Member) 1. The complaint is filed by the first and second complainants seeking compensation to the tune of `50 lakhs on account of death of their son that occurred in a motor vehicle accident dated 2.3.2008 involving the bus belonging to the second opposite party-engineering college. 2. Briefly the averments of the complaint are that the complainants son viz., Someshwera Hemanth was studying B.Tech III year in the second opposite party-college at Rajahmundry. Certain Companies such as Satyam Computers, Bank of America, TCS Intel Limited and Wipro proposed to conduct campus interviews at Kakinada for the third year students of Chaitanya College of Engineering and Technology and those of the second opposite party-engineering college for which purpose the second opposite party-engineering college had taken its third year students including the complainants son in its bus bearing number AP 5W 3621 with capacity of 42 passengers, met with an accident when the...
Divisional Engineer and Another Vs. Suresh
Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Nagpur
Decided on: May-15-2014
S.B. Sawarkar, Member: 1. The instant appeal challenges the order of the D.C.D.R.F., Nagpur dated 05/08/2002 passed in complaint No. 107/2002 granting the complaint. The Forum directed the O.P. to reconnect the electric supply by providing a new meter in the span of the 30 days. 2. Brief facts beneath the appeal are that the complainant Suresh Bhikaji Sakharkar has a Floor Mill with two electrical connections at village Watoda, District Nagpur. He was regularly paying the bills of electricity. On 11/04/2002 the officers of flying squad of the O.P. No.1 inspected the meters in his floor mill and prepared the inspection report for meter No. 410012547386. They disconnected the supply and also filed a complaint against him in the Police Station. 3. The complainant complained that when the seal of the meter was intact, the flying squad conspired and made out a case of electricity theft as the complainant did not pay the officers of O.Ps. who demanded 25,000/-. As he could not pay, the O.Ps....
The Reliance Life Insurance Co. Ltd. Rep. by Its Branch Manager and An ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: May-15-2014
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The appeal is challenge to the order dated 23.04.2014 passed in CC 6/2013 by the District Forum, Guntur. 2. The facts of the case leading to filing of the appeal are that the respondents father obtained Life Insurance policy bearing no. 16638248 from the appellant insurance company for sum assured of Rs.3,75,000/- for the period commencing from 23.3.2010 till 23.03.2020 and the premium was payable half yearly @ Rs.12,500/-. The respondents father died on 14.5.2010. The respondent being nominee of his father for the sum assured in terms of the insurance policy, lodged claim with the appellant which repudiated the same on the ground that the insured suppressed his correct age at the time of obtaining the insurance policy. 3. Questioning the rationality of repudiation of his claim, the respondent filed the complaint before the District Forum and the appellant resisted the same on the ground that the insured submitted proposal form bearing N...
Hermit Singh Sethi Vs. B.M.W. India Private Limited and Others
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: May-15-2014
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. The complainant has filed this complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the opposite parties for seeking direction to the opposite parties : (a) to pay the price of the B.M.W. Rs.35,80,309/-, (b) to pay interest on the said amount @ 18% p.a. from 29.03.2013 till date of payment (c) to pay compensation for mental agony Rs.2,00,000/-, (d) to pay cost of litigation and other relief, which this Commission deems fit and just. 2. Brief facts of the complaint as per the complainant are : that the complainant is a reputed businessman and his business spread all over the State of Maharashtra and Chhattisgarh. The O.P. No.1 is manufacturer of B.M.W. Car and its office is situated at D.L.F. Cyber City, Phase “ 2, No.8, Tower B, 7th Floor, Gurgaon, Haryana and the O.P.Nos.2 and 3 are the authorized dealers of O.P.No.1 and their offices are situated at Raipur and Nagpur. The complainant purchased B.M.W.X .1 20 DX Line Car from O.P.No.2...
State Farms Corporation of India Limited and Another Vs. Braham Kumar ...
Court: Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Panchkula
Decided on: May-15-2014
Nawab Singh, President (Oral): 1. This order shall dispose of afore-mentioned appeals because they have arisen out of the order dated September 30th, 2013 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum (for short District Forum), Hisar, in complaint No.20 of 2013 filed by Braham Kumar. 2. First Appeal bearing No.862 of 2013 has been filed by State Farms Corporation of India Limited Jaipur, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to Opposite Party No.2) and Second Appeal bearing No.101 of 2014 has been filed by Braham Kumar (hereinafter referred to as Complainant). 3. Braham Kumar -complainant purchased four bags of Guar Seed (each containing 4 Kgs) of HG-563 variety on June 22nd, 2012 vide Cash Memo No.2420 (Exhibit C-1) for Rs.6400/- from Shiv Shakti Beej Bhandar-opposite party No.1. The seed was processed and prepared by State Farms Corporation of India Limited Jaipur-opposite party No.2. He sowed the seed in four acres of land and irrigated the same as per the instructions of the respond...
Hemlata Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
Court: SCDRC
Decided on: May-15-2014
S.M. Shembole, Presiding Judicial Member: 1. We heard counsel for both side and perused the application under order. We have also perused the copy of impugned judgment and order and copies of medical certificate and other documents. 2. Undisputedly there was 119 days delay in preferring the appeal against the judgment and order dated 15.05.2013 passed by District Consumer Forum, Aurangabad allowing consumer complaint No.283/2011. 3. It is submitted by Shri. Lakhotiya, learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant received the copy of impugned judgment and order on 09.10.2012, but she could not file appeal in time as she was hospitalized and further she was advised for bed rest. Thereafter her husband met with an accident and on 10.11.2012 was hospitalized. Her husband discharged from hospital on 18th November, 2012. Thereafter the applicant Hemlata was ailing and she was advised for rest for the period from 12.12.2012 to 27.12.2014 and again for the period from 27.01.2013 to 10....
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited Rep. by Its Manager Vs ...
Court: SCDRC
Decided on: May-15-2014
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1) The appeal preferred by the complainant against the order of the District Forum allowing the complaint on the premise of the appellants failure to prove intoxicated condition of the driver at the time of the accident and its failure to examine Mani Kumar to whom the respondent said to have given oral intimation of the accident and resultant damage caused to the insured car. 2) The respondent got his car bearing registration number AP 16 BM 6679 insured with the appellant-insurance company for a sum of Rs. 5,75,696/- covering the period from 10.08.2011 to 09.08.2012. The car met with an accident on 01.01.2012 during night hours near Siddhartha College, Vijayawada. The respondent got the vehicle repaired by spending an amount of Rs.1,98,000/-.The appellant-insurance company repudiated the claim on19.03.2012 on the ground that driver was under the influence of alcohol and notice in writing was not given immediately after occurrence of the a...
Sri Sai Builder Rep. by Its Proprietor Vs. Sri Matha Towers Residents ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: May-15-2014
Oral Order: (Thota Ashok Kumar, Member) 1. The opposite parties no.2 is the appellant. For convenience sake the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to hereunder. 2. The brief facts of the complaint are that the 1st opposite party is the owner of the site and the 2nd opposite party builder had constructed apartment in the name and style of Sri Matha Towers in Krishnalanka, Vijayawada. The opposite parties sold the flats to the members of the complainants association under semi-finished stage and promised orally that the opposite parties would complete the work of apartment in all aspects. They promised that they would arrange lift, cellar, parking for each flat, lighting on the eastern side of the wall, construction of a room for watchman, electricity transformer, complete open terrace finishing, stair case finishing with marble stones and to remove waste material and also to pay all dues to Municipal corporation and Electricity department to enable the members of the assoc...
The Branch Manager State Bank of India Narasannapeta, Srikakulam Dist. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: May-15-2014
Oral Order: (Thota Ashok Kumar, Member) 1. The opposite party is the appellant. For convenience sake the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to hereunder. 2. The brief facts of the complaint are that the complainant is having S.B.A/c bearing No.11028699992 in opposite party bank and he is drawing his pension through the said SB Account. On 6.2.2010 the complainant availed a pension loan bearing A/c No.31049264344 for an amount of Rs.59,000/- agreeing to repay the same with interest @ 15% per annum with EMI of Rs.2500/- per month which was automatically recovered from the SB Account of the complainant. The complainant in the month of May 2011 has paid an amount of Rs.21,000/- towards pension loan account and closed the said account. After closing the said pension loan account, the complainant has availed another pension loan of Rs.1,00,000/- on 24.5.2011 bearing A/c No.31759353861 with interest @ 14.50% per annum to be repaid at Rs.3,500/- per month. The complainant paid to...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »