Scdrc Court April 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shankar Lal Arora Vs. Delhi State Industrial Development Corporation L ...
Court: SCDRC
Decided on: Apr-28-2014
S.C. Jain, Member: 1) The present complaint has been filed by the complainant under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986. The facts of the case are that the Complainants father Late Sh. Jindu Ram Arora was running a small scale unit in the name and style of M/s Arora Traders for his and his family livelihood Government of NCR Delhi brought a policy according to which industries based in Delhi were ordered to the relocated from residential areas to newly developed industrial areas and the opposite party proposed to allot plots to industrial units under relocation scheme. 2) The complainants late father vide application No. 29626 applied for plot under relocation scheme with the opposite party and the opposite party allotted a plot bearing No. 52, Pocket D, Sector 4, Bawana Industrial Complex admeasuring 250 Sq.mt@ Rs.4200/- per Sq. Mt. costing Rs.10,50,000/- vide allotment letter dt. 23.10.2000. 3) The complainants late father deposited Rs.2,14,500/- with opposite party agains...
Carolina Fernandes Vs. M/S. F.X. Builders and Others
Court: Goa State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Panaji
Decided on: Apr-28-2014
N.A. Britto, President: 1. In this appeal filed under Section 15 of the C.P. Act, 1986, the complainant seeks enhancement of interest to 15% or 18% per year as against 9% per year awarded to her by the Lr. District Forum, by order dated 29/11/13. 2. It is rather unfortunate that a complaint which was filed on 6/1/03 came to be disposed off more than a decade later, on 29/11/13, inspite of the fact that the C.P. Act mandates that the consumer complaint ought to be disposed off within three months or so. 3. Some bare facts are required to be stated to dispose off this appeal. 4. The complainant had entered into an agreement dated 18/6/1998 with the OPs for construction of a shop identified as shop No. 11 having an area of 12 sq.mts as per the plans in a building to be known as F. X. Towers, for a sum of Rs.4.8 lacs out of which a sum of Rs.3.42 lacs was paid to the OPs. 5. The complainant under the pretext that the complainant wanted to start the business of a hardware shop, took the key...
Rahul Indane Vs. K.N. Abdussamad and Another
Court: Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram
Decided on: Apr-28-2014
P.Q. Barkathali: President This is an appeal filed by the first opposite party in CC.375/13 on the file of CDRF, Malappuram under section 15 of Consumer Protection Act, against the order dated, January 24, 2013 directing the opposite parties to pay Rs.25,000/- as compensation . 2. The case of the complainant as testified by him as PW1 before the Forum and as detailed in the complaint in brief is this:- Complainant is a retired section officer of the Calicut University. He has an LPG gas connection of the first opposite party who is the agency of 2nd opposite party, the Indian Oil Corporation. His consumer number is 4809. Complainant booked for a refill cylinder on August 31, 2013 with the opposite party No.1. The first opposite party informed that gas cylinder will be made available to him as per cash memo dated, September 20, 2013. On September 25, 2013 complainant was informed that the said booking is cancelled. Therefore he again booked the gas cylinder. Meanwhile the gas cylinder w...
Srei. Equipment Finance Private Limited, Through : Manager Vs. Ibrahim ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Apr-28-2014
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 19.09.2013, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Korba (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum") in Complaint Case No.20/2013. By the impugned order, the learned District Forum, has partly allowed the complaint of the respondent (complainant) and directed the appellant (O.P.) to pay a sum of Rs.6,50,000/- within two months from the date of order to the respondent (complainant), along with interest 7% p.a. from 09.04.2012 till date of payment, to pay a sum of Rs.3,000/- per month towards maintenance and security of the Hydra crane from filing of the complaint i.e. 11.02.2013 and the said amount, is payable by the appellant (O.P.) till giving delivery of the crane. The respondent (complainant) will return the crane within 2 months and will receive the amount from the appellant (O.P.) The District Forum has further directed the appellant (O.P.) to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- to the respondent (complainant), as...
Carolina Fernandes Vs. M/S. F.X. Builders and Others
Court: SCDRC
Decided on: Apr-28-2014
N.A. Britto, President: 1. In this appeal filed under Section 15 of the C.P. Act, 1986, the complainant seeks enhancement of interest to 15% or 18% per year as against 9% per year awarded to her by the Lr. District Forum, by order dated 29/11/13. 2. It is rather unfortunate that a complaint which was filed on 6/1/03 came to be disposed off more than a decade later, on 29/11/13, inspite of the fact that the C.P. Act mandates that the consumer complaint ought to be disposed off within three months or so. 3. Some bare facts are required to be stated to dispose off this appeal. 4. The complainant had entered into an agreement dated 18/6/1998 with the OPs for construction of a shop identified as shop No. 11 having an area of 12 sq.mts as per the plans in a building to be known as F. X. Towers, for a sum of Rs.4.8 lacs out of which a sum of Rs.3.42 lacs was paid to the OPs. 5. The complainant under the pretext that the complainant wanted to start the business of a hardware shop, took the key...
Indian Post Office Akola and Another Vs. Sau. Rekha Anil Dangur and An ...
Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Nagpur
Decided on: Apr-28-2014
B.A. Shaikh, Presiding Member: 1. This appeal is preferred against order dtd.24.08.2009 passed by District Forum, Akola in Consumer Complaint bearing No. CC/09/02 by which the complaint has been partly allowed. 2. The case of the complainants as set out in the complaint in brief is that they are the retired employees, respectively aged about 59 years and 65 years. They had opened saving account No. 3254804 on 19.08.2004 with the opposite party (for short œthe O.P.?) No.2 “ Sub-post Office at Akola. They had invested money with the said Post Office under various schemes, of which the interest used to be deposited in their abovesaid saving account. Both the complainants used to withdraw the said interest from time to time to maintain their livelihood. The O.P.No.1 is the Head Post Office of Akola. The complainants also invested on 14.12.2004 an amount Rs.4.60 Lacs with the O.P.No.2 under their Special Saving Scheme floated for Senior Citizens. As per said scheme, the Senior C...
K. Mahendran Vs. Dr. V. Srinivasan
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Apr-28-2014
(The appellant is the complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum against the opposite party praying certain reliefs. The District Forum dismissed the complainant. Against the said order the appellant / complainant filed this appeal praying to setaside the order of the District Forum in CC.No.22/2008, dated 15.07.2009. This appeal coming before us for hearing finally on 20.03.2014, upon hearing the arguments on either side, perusing the documents, lower court records, and the order passed by the District Forum, this commission made the following order.) A.K. Annamalai, Presiding Judicial Member The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. 2. The complainant being a tailor in profession met with an accident on 02.07.2006 and sustained fracture in right leg for which undergone surgery in the opposite partys hospital and stayed about 10 days as an inpatient and subsequently developed pain and was not able to move at all and undergone another surgery at Rex Ortho Hospital d...
M/S. Just Dial Limited Vs. M/S. Comwen Information Technologies Pvt. L ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-28-2014
Oral Order: (GopalaKrishna Tamada, President) This revision petition is directed against the order passed by the District Forum in I.A.No.113/2014 in C.C.No.237/2014 dated 10-4-2014 whereby the District Forum-III, Hyderabad by its order directed the opposite party not to stop the services of the petitioner i.e. complainant pursuant to the contract dated 28-3-2014. It appears that there was a contract between the respondent/complainant and the petitioner/opposite party for a period of one year but however as the opposite party is not adhering to the terms of the said contract and providing services as agreed upon, the complainant approached the District Forum and filed the complaint and the same is numbered as C.C.No.237/2014. In the said C.C. it also filed I.A.No.113/2014 seeking an interim injunction not to stop the services pursuant to the contract dated 28-3-2014. The District Forum having considered the said petition and also the submissions granted interim direction as prayed for....
The Branch Manager, the New India Assurance Company Limited and Anothe ...
Court: SCDRC
Decided on: Apr-26-2014
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 02.03.2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bilaspur (C.G.) (henceforth District Forum) in Complaint Case No.128/2011. By the impugned order, the District Forum, has allowed the complaint filed by the respondent /complainant and directed the appellants/OPs/Insurance Company to pay within two months from the date of order a insurance benefit amount Rs.1,00,000/- to the respondent/complainant along with interest @ 7% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 18.08.2011. The appellants/OPs have been further directed to pay a sum of Rs.1,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.1,000/- as cost of litigation to the respondent/complainant. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint filed before the District Forum case are : that the respondent / complainant had purchased an insurance policy no.452000/48/10/34/00000271 for his shop Manoj Cycle Stores for the period from 19.05....
The Branch Manager, the New India Assurance Company Limited and Anothe ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Apr-26-2014
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 02.03.2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bilaspur (C.G.) (henceforth District Forum) in Complaint Case No.128/2011. By the impugned order, the District Forum, has allowed the complaint filed by the respondent /complainant and directed the appellants/OPs/Insurance Company to pay within two months from the date of order a insurance benefit amount Rs.1,00,000/- to the respondent/complainant along with interest @ 7% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 18.08.2011. The appellants/OPs have been further directed to pay a sum of Rs.1,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.1,000/- as cost of litigation to the respondent/complainant. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint filed before the District Forum case are : that the respondent / complainant had purchased an insurance policy no.452000/48/10/34/00000271 for his shop Manoj Cycle Stores for the period from 19.05....
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »