Scdrc Court April 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and Another Vs. Jagmohan ...
Court: Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
Decided on: Apr-01-2014
B.C. Kandpal, President: 1. These two appeals, one by the service provider “ telephone department and another by the complainant, arise out of the order dated 01.10.2010 passed by the District Forum, Dehradun in consumer complaint No. 49 of 2005, whereby the District Forum has partly allowed the consumer complaint and directed the opposite parties to pay compensation of Rs.2,45,000/- to the complainant. Aggrieved by the said order, the telephone department has filed First Appeal No. 338 of 2010 and whereas not being satisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the District Forum, the complainant has filed First Appeal No. 351 of 2010 for enhancement. Since both the appeals arise out of the same judgment and order, hence these are disposed of together by this common order. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case as mentioned in the consumer complaint, are that on 19.02.2004 at about 6:00 a.m., a call came on telephone connection No. 2695196 issued in the name of Sh. Maan...
Avneet G. Singh Vs. Icici Lombard General Insurance Company Limited, T ...
Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh
Decided on: Apr-01-2014
Sham Sunder (Retd.), President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 31.10.2013, rendered by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-II, UT, Chandigarh (hereinafter to be called as the District Forum only) vide which, it dismissed the complaint, filed by the complainant (now appellant). 2. The facts, in brief are that, in September, 2010, a representative of Opposite Parties No.1 and 3 (now appellants), approached the complainant, for getting a cashless health Insurance Policy. The complainant and her husband, took ICICI Lombard Health Care-Family Protect 2007- Policy, from Opposite Parties No.1 and 3, valid for the period from 07.09.2010 to 06.09.2011, for the total sum assured, to the tune of Rs.4 lacs, on payment of premium, to the tune of Rs.8,089/-. It was stated that, thereafter, the complainant suffered health problems, in the month of October 2010. She got herself checked from Fortis City Centre, Sector 9-D, Chandigarh, on 14.10.2010, where the Doctor advis...
- ‹ Prev
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- Next ›