Scdrc Court April 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. Through Supdt. ...
Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad
Decided on: Apr-11-2014
K.B. Gawali, Member: 1. This appeal is preferred by the original opponents who are the officeRs.of the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd against the impugned judgment and order dtd. 16/01/2009 passed by the Dist.Consumer Forum Nanded in CC.No.326/2008, whereby the complaint is partly allowed holding the appellants as liable for the deficiency in service. The respondent is the original complainant. 2. Factual aspects of this case in a nutshell are that the respondent is a farmer having ancestral agricultural land bearing Gut.No. 474 of village Barad Tq. Mukhed Dist. Nanded. That, there is a well in this Gut.No. on which electric pump is installed for which the father of the complainant had obtained electric connection from the appellants. It is further submitted that during the year 2006-07 he had planted sugarcane in the said land admeasuring 3 and half acre. That, 11 kv electric line had also passed from the said G.No. 474 having one cut point in the land of the c...
Mahindra Holidays and Resorts India Ltd. Chennai and Others Vs. Sudip ...
Court: West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-11-2014
Kalidas Mukherjee, President This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by Learned District Forum, Kolkata, Unit-I allowing the complaint and directing the OPs jointly and severally to pay Rs.1,33,077/-, Rs.10,000/- as compensation and Rs.2,000/- as litigation cost to the Complainant within 45 days from the date of communication of the order failing which the interest @ 9% p.a. shall accrue on the aforesaid amount till realisation. The case of the Complainant/Respondent, in short, is that the Complainant took the membership of OPs by paying the amount of Rs.1,33,077/- by way of EMI through his credit card. The Complainant hired the services of the OPs and, as such, he is a consumer u/s 2(1)(d)(ii) of the C. P. Act. The OPs issued certificate of membership to the Complainant on 31/03/05 which is valid from 09/2005 to 08/2030. Due to shifting from Bombay to Kolkata the Complainant requested the OPs on 17/02/09 through e-mail seeking confirmation of reservation for stay...
Sony India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Bakeeta Albuquerque and Another
Court: Goa State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Panaji
Decided on: Apr-11-2014
N.A. Britto, President: 1. Heard Shri. A. Arsekar, the lr. aadvocate of the Petitioner. 2. The Petitioner is the OP No. 2 in CC No. 35/13. Their application for condonation of delay of 37 days, in filing the written version, has been dismissed by the impugned order dated 10/01/14 and this revision is directed against the said order. 3. The Petitioner as OP No. 2 was duly served with notice of the said complaint on 3/8/13, as stated by the complainant, though this date was not mentioned in the application for condonation of delay. On 4/9/13 the said notice was forwarded by the Petitioner Company to its centralized law firm informing that the next date of hearing was fixed on 18/9/13 for filing the written version. The case of the Petitioner is that the Petitioner Company engaged a Counsel in South Goa and forwarded the necessary papers of the complaint and the wakalatnama to him, but, however due to ill health of the Counsel of the centralized law firm the written version could not be d...
Ajijur Rehman Firoz Ahmad Shaikh and Another Vs. Tara Gulab Gupta and ...
Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-11-2014
Usha S. Thakare, Presiding Judicial Member: 1. Both these appeals are listed before me for hearing as per order passed by Honble Justice Mr.R.C. Chavan, President of this Commission in view of provisions of Section 16(1-B)(iii) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 since there is difference of opinion between two Members who had heard both these appeals. 2. By the order under challenge, Learned District Forum has partly allowed the complaint bearing No.527/2006. Opponent-Ajijur Rehman Firoz Ahmad Shaikh is directed to pay an amount of Rs.1,22,500/- to the complainant towards medical bills of treatment. He was further directed to pay an amount of Rs.10,000/- towards mental pain and agony and amount of Rs.2,000/- towards cost of the litigation. 3. Being aggrieved by the judgement and order dated 06/03/2010 passed by District Forum, Thane in consumer complaint No.527/2006, appellant/original opponent-Ajijur Rehman Firoz Ahmad Shaikh has preferred appeal bearing No.390/2010. Being dissatisfied ...
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Kolkata and Another Vs. Banita Dey, K ...
Court: West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-11-2014
J. Bag, ld. Member. The present appeal is directed against the Order dated 03.12.12 of the Ld. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolkata, Unit “II in Case No. CDF/Unit “II / CC No. 169 of 2011 , whereby, the complaint case was allowed on contest in part with cost against OP Nos. 1 and 2 and dismissed on contest against OP No.3. The complaint case, in brief, was as follows: The insured Biswajit Dey, being the husband of the Complainant , had obtained a Group Janata Personnel Accident Insurance Policy from the OP Insurance Company for a sum insured of Rs. 50,000/-(Fifty thousand) only . The said policy holder was a Filed Worker of the Golden Trust Financial Services, being OP No. 3 who issued the insurance certificate No. 4751170000001/4751170030027 for the period from 01.12.200 to 31.11.2015.The Complainant is the wife of the deceased policy holder and also recorded as Nominee of the insured. On 18.12.2008 at about 9AM the insured died by drowning when he fell down...
The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Ruhi Sharma Daughter of Late
Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh
Decided on: Apr-11-2014
Padma Pandey, Member: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 06.03.2014, rendered by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, UT, Chandigarh (hereinafter to be called as the District Forum only) vide which it allowed the complaint filed by the complainant and directed the Opposite Party (now appellant) as under:- œ12. For the reasons recorded above, we find merit in the complaint and the same is allowed. OP is directed :- i) To reimburse the claim of the father of the complainant and the other two heirs of Sh.P.B.Sharma to the tune of Rs.2 lacs alongwith interest @9% p.a. from the date of the claim till realization. ii) To pay compensation for mental harassment and agony to the complainant and the remaining two legal heirs of Sh.P.B.Sharma to the tune of Rs.15,000/-. iii) To pay the cost of litigation of Rs.7500/- to the complainant. 13. This order shall be complied with by the OP within one month from the date of receipt of its certified copy, failing which,...
Life Insurance Corporation of India Through Its Senior Divisional Mana ...
Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Nagpur
Decided on: Apr-11-2014
B.A. Shaikh, Presiding Member: 1. This appeal is preferred against the order dated 22/11/2010 passed in Consumer Complaint bearing CC No. 93/2010, by the District Consumer Forum, Yavatmal by which the complaint has been partly allowed. 2. The case of the complainant as set out in the complaint in brief is that he is the husband of deceased Chayya. The deceased was the assistant teacher in Yavatmal Zilla Parishad. She had taken loan from the opposite party (for short O.P.) No. 2. As per the rules, the O.P. No.2 had obtained insurance policy from the O.P. No. 1- LIC to cover the risk of the complainant and other members of the O.P. No.2. The premium of that policy was being deducted from the salary of the wife of the complainant. The wife of the complainant died on 14/12/2008. Therefore, the claim proposal was submitted by the complainant through O.P. No.2 to O.P. No.1 claiming Rs.75,000/- as the sum assured under that policy. However, the O.P. No.1 repudiated the claim on 14/08/2009 o...
Senior Superintendent Post Offices and Another Vs. Lavang Lata Sharma ...
Court: Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
Decided on: Apr-11-2014
C.C. Pant, Member: 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 28.09.2013 passed by the District Forum, Haridwar, in consumer complaint No. 08 of 2013, whereby the District Forum has allowed the consumer complaint and has directed the Postal Department to pay to the complainants a sum of Rs. 1.00 lac, within a month from the date of the order. 2. In brief, the facts of the case are that the complainants“Smt. Lavang Lata Sharma and Sh. Navin Chandra Sharma had jointly opened a Term Deposit Account bearing No. 2224084 with the Sub-Post Office, Mayapur, Haridwar and deposited a sum of Rs. 50,000/- on 11.01.2005 for a period of two years. When the complainants submitted the pass-book to the Post Office on 03.02.2010, they were told that the maturity amount of the said term deposit account, amounting to Rs. 57,488/-, has been withdrawn on 13.03.2008 and the account has been closed. The complainants were shocked and made a lot of correspondence with different author...
Santa BantA.Com Limited and Another Vs. M/S. Porsche Cars, Through Its ...
Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh
Decided on: Apr-11-2014
Dev Raj, Member: 1. In brief, the facts of the case, are that complainant No.2, is the Director of complainant No.1 “ M/s Santa Banta.Com Limited, whereas, Opposite Party No.1, is the manufacturer of Porsche cars, which are being imported through Opposite Party No.6 and sold through Opposite Party No.3. It was stated that Opposite Party No.2, is the representative in India of Opposite Party No.1, while Opposite Party No.5, looks after the operations of Opposite Party No.1, and is responsible for overall supervision of imports and sales in India being the Brand Manager. It was further stated that Opposite Party No.4 is the Sales Manager of Opposite Party No.3, and the person responsible for inducing customers to purchase Porsche cars for and on behalf of Opposite Party No.3. It was further stated that Opposite Parties No.7 and 8 are the Directors of Opposite Party No.3, as well as Opposite Party No.6 and they are responsible for the conduct of business management and day to day af...
Dean, Jyotirmoy School of Business Kalikapur, Kolkata Vs. Rabit Biswas ...
Court: West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-11-2014
Kalidas Mukherjee, President This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by Learned District Forum, Alipore, South 24-Pargan as in CC 224, 225, 226 and 227 of 2012 allowing the complaints with cost of Rs.10,000/- to the Complainants of each case. The OP was directed to refund the amount deposited by the Complainants after deducting Rs.1,000/- in each case. The OP was also directed to pay Rs.10,000/- to the Complainants of each case as compensation within 15 days from the date of passing order failing which an interest @ 10% p.a. shall accrue till the date of realisation. The case of the respective Complainants, in short, is that they got admitted in the OP Institution for PGDM programme. The sum of Rs.1,10,400/- was deposited by each Complainant. Subsequently, they got opportunity of admission elsewhere to pursue MBA course and they sent letter to the College Authority for cancellation of admission and refund of money. It has been alleged in the petition of complaint...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »