Scdrc Court April 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited and Others Vs. Ravinder Singh B ...
Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
Padma Pandey, Member: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 3.3.2014 rendered by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, UT, Chandigarh (hereinafter to be called as the District Forum only) vide which it allowed the complaint filed by the complainant, and directed the Opposite Parties (now appellants) as under:- œ12] In view of the foregoings, we are of the opinion that the complaint must succeed. The same is accordingly allowed. The OPs are directed to pay the sum insured amount of Rs.5.00 lacs to the complainant as the expenditure incurred by him on the said treatment was more than that. The OPs are also directed to pay a sum of Rs.25,000/- to the complainant as compensation for causing him mental agony and harassment due to their deficient act, besides paying Rs.10,000/- as costs of litigation. The liability of the OPs shall be joint and several. This order be complied with by the OPs within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this or...
Radhakrishna Co-operative Housing Society Through Its President Vs. Vi ...
Court: SCDRC
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
B.A. Shaikh, Presiding Member: 1. This appeal is preferred against order dtd.08.05.2007 passed by District Forum, Nagpur in consumer complaint bearing No.CC/06/442 by which the complaint has been partly allowed. 2. The case of the complainant as set out in the complaint in brief is that he entered into an agreement of sale of Plot No.1 of Somalwada with the opposite party (for short œthe O.P.?) No.1 for a consideration of Rs.1,10,000/-. The agreement of sale was reduced into writing on 08.06.1992 which was signed by O.P.Nos. 1 and 2 being the President and the Member of society namely Radhakrishna Co-operative Housing Society (for short œthe society?). The complainant paid part of consideration of Rs.25,000/- and remaining amount was to be paid to O.P.No.1 at the time of registration of sale-deed. The complainant was ready to pay the same to O.P.No.1. But it avoided to receive the same. The complainant made application to Nagpur Improvement Trust (for short NIT) which is jo...
Ramavathar Agarwal Vs. Manager Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Lim ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member 1. The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. He filed the appeal assailing the order of the District Forum which dismissed the complaint holding that in absence of documents showing occurrence of accident within limits of its jurisdiction, it has no jurisdiction to try the matter. 2. The brief facts of the case as seen from the averments of the complaint are that the appellant insured his motor cycle bearing registration number A P-01-H-7625 with the respondent-insurance company and he met with an accident on 25.09.2010 while returning from his fields at Nirala village when his motor cycle slipped off and he fell down and sustained fracture to his right hand. The appellant was shifted to the hospital of Dr.Tippe Swamy where he was given first aid and from there the appellant was shifted to the hospital of Dr.Ajitpahadke where he had undergone surgery and a steel rod was inserted in his right hand. The appellant claimed that he incurred an amount of R...
Anoop Radwal, Chamoli (Uttarakhand) Vs. Chairman Tulaâandeuro;andtrad ...
Court: Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
C.C. Pant, Member: 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 11.04.2012 passed by the District Forum, Dehradun, whereby the District Forum has dismissed the consumer complaint No.73 of 2011. 2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the complainant“Sh. Anoop Radwal took admission in the second year of Mechanical Engineering on 10.07.2010 in Tulas Institute, Dhoolkot, Chakrata Road, Dehradun“opposite party under lateral entry system and deposited a sum of Rs. 81,128/- against tuition fee and Rs. 12,000/- under other heads on 12.08.2010. However, after attending few classes, the complainant felt that the academic atmosphere of the institute was not proper and also there was no safety of personal belongings. As such, he decided to leave the institute and asked the authorities of the institute to refund the fee. On 29.12.2010, the complainants father Sh. S.L. Radwal also came to the institute and requested the Director of the institute to refund the fee...
Central Bank of India, Branch: Fafadih, Through Branch Manager Vs. Rek ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 26.04.2013, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G) (henceforth œDistrict Forum?) in Complaint Case No.28/2012. By the impugned, the learned District Forum, has partly allowed the complaint of the respondent (complainant) and directed the appellant (O.P.) to pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000/-, which is the amount of cheque along, with interest @ 6% from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 01.02.2012 till the date of payment. The District Forum has further directed to the appellant/O.P. to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.3,000/- towards cost of litigation. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint filed by the respondent/complainant before the District Forum are : that the respondent/complainant and her husband namely Tulsi Patel having a joint saving bank account No.1261355823 in the appellant (O.P.) Central Bank of India, Branch Fafadih, Raipur....
Aman Gruha Nirman Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit, Jalgaon, Through Its Chai ...
Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
K.B. Gawali, Member: 1. Both these appeals have been originated from common judgment and order dated 29.8.2008 passed by District Consumer Forum, Jalgaon in C.C.442/2007 whereby the complaint is partly allowed holding appellants as liable for deficiency in service . Appeal No.1058/08 is filed by the original opponent No.1 to 3. Opponent No.1 is housing society, opponent No.2 is the Chairman of Society and opponent No.3 is the Secretary of the Society whereas appeal No.1110/08 is filed by original opponent No.5 who is Ex.Chairman of the said housing society. Respondent No.1 in both the appeals is original complainant , respondent No.2 in appeal No.1058/2008 and respondent NO.5 in appeal No.1110/08 is original opponent No.4 and he is contractor. For better understanding appellants in both the appeals who are office bearers of the society are hereinafter collectively termed as "opponent office bearers of the society", respondent No.1 in both the appeals is herein after termed as 'complain...
The New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Pardeep Kumar and Others
Court: Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Panchkula
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
B.M. Bedi, Judicial Member: 1. This appeal has been preferred against the order dated October 28th, 2013 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum (for short District Forum), Yamuna Nagar. 2. On May 2nd, 2012, Pardeep Kumar-complainant (respondent No.1) boarded bus bearing registration No.HR-58/7327 from Ambala which was going to Yamuna Nagar. The bus was being driven by Ram Nath-respondent No.2 and respondent No.3-Vipin Kumar was the conductor in the said bus. The respondent No.1 was sitting on the seat near the driver seat. When the bus reached at Jagadhri Bus Stand, the respondent No.2-driver put water in the radiator after opening its cover but without switching off the ignition of the bus. The radiator was so heated, that the water boiled and sprinkled on the body of the respondent No.1 (complainant), due to which he suffered burn injuries. The driver left the respondent No.1 at nearby a chemist shop and went with the bus. 3. The respondent No.1 informed his father on t...
Mahindra Holidays and Resorts India Ltd. and Another Vs. Dr. Sushil Pa ...
Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
Dev Raj, Member: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 17.12.2013, rendered by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-II, UT, Chandigarh (hereinafter to be called as the District Forum only) vide which it allowed the complaint, filed by the complainant and directed the Opposite Parties (now appellants) as under:- œ13. In the light of above observations, we are of the concerted view that the Opposite Parties are found deficient in giving proper service to the complainant. Hence, the present complaint of the Complainant deserves to succeed against the Opposite Parties, and the same is allowed, qua them, jointly and severally. The Opposite Parties are directed to:- [a] To refund Rs.2,86,086/- received from the Complainant towards the Membership; [b] To pay Rs.25,000/- on account of deficiency in service and causing mental and harassment to the Complainant; [c] To pay Rs.10,000/- as cost of litigation; 14. The above said order shall be complied within 45 days of ...
Santoshi Mata Vit Karkhana Vs. Manager, Cholamandalam M.S. General and ...
Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
K.B. Gawali, Member: 1. This complaint is filed by Shri.Rajendra Thakare who is proprietor of Jai Santoshi Mata bricks factory situated at Gut No.204/1 of village Dighave, Tq.Sakri, Dist.Dhule against the Cholamandalam Insurance Company alleging deficiency in service. 2. The brief facts of the complaint are that, the complainant is running brick industry for which he had obtained loan from Central Bank of India i.e. opponent NO.3. That, he had obtained insurance policy through opponent No.1 and 2 bank by name Fire and Special Perils on 4.9.2010 for the total insured sum of Rs.50 lakhs covering period of policy from 28.8.2010 to 27.8.2011. That, on 28.2.2011 there was untimely heavy rain associated with stormy wind due to which complainant had sustained damage of his raw-material of the bricks and also finished product of bricks. It was submitted that raw bricks were 7 lakhs which were damaged, value of which was Rs.13,25,000/-, in addition cement concrete wall measuring 10 X 20 ft. was...
P.N. Shanmugam Vs. the Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Gingee, Vi ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
(The Appellant is the complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum against the opposite parties praying certain relief. The District Forum dismissed the complaint. Against the said order, the appellant / complainant filed this appeal praying to setaside the order of the District Forum in CC.No.87/2003, dated 27.08.2010. This appeal coming before us for hearing finally on 18.03.2014, upon hearing the arguments on either side, perusing the documents, lower court records, and the order passed by the District Forum, this commission made the following order.) A.K. Annamalai, Judicial Member The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. 2. The complainant availed Agricultural Jewel Loan from the opposite party during the year 1999 by pledging 43 grams jewels and obtained loan of Rs.10,000/- and subsequently when he went to the bank for redeeming the jewels on 8.4.2003 he came to know that the jewels were already auctioned and a sum of Rs.4050/- is available to be payable by the c...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »