Scdrc Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gurcharan Singh Alias Charan Singh Vs. Punjab State Power Corporation ...
Court: Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chandigarh
Decided on: Jan-27-2014
(Order) Gurcharan Singh Saran, Presiding Judicial Member: 1. The appellant/complainant (hereinafter called œthe complainant?) has filed the present appeal against the order dated 27.7.2011 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Fatehgarh Sahib(hereinafter called œthe District Forum?) in consumer complaint No.216 dated 2.8.2010 vide which the complaint filed by the complainant was dismissed. 2. The complaint was filed by the complainant against the opposite parties on the allegations that he had applied for 7.5 BHP agriculture tubewell connection under OYT Scheme and deposited required fee and the opposite party accepted the application and issued demand notice to fulfil the requirements or demand notice. He deposited Rs. 73,310/- against receipt dated 24.6.2009 and spent Rs. 39,042/- approximately for installing electric meter and other equipments. However, some persons filed Civil Suit against the complainant in the Court of Sh. A.K. Bansal, Civil Judge ...
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Through Its Legal Manager Vs. Sami ...
Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad
Decided on: Jan-27-2014
Uma S. Bora, Member: 1. Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. through its Legal Manager, Mumbai preferred this appeal challenging the judgment and order passed by District Forum, Aurangabad on 21.01.2012 while deciding consumer complaint No.287/2011. 2. Facts giving rise to this appeal are as under: Respondent No.1/original complainant Samindrabai Tryambak Jadhav resident of Pishor Taluka Kannad Dist. Aurangabad is a wife of Tryambak Sandu Jadhav. Said Tryambak was farmer and owner of land Gut No.583 situated at Pishor Tq. Kannad Dist. Aurangabad. That, for the farmers in the State of Maharashtra, State Government had obtained œFarmers Personal Accident Policy? for sum assured Rs.1,00,000/-. On 19.06.2009 Tryambak died by falling from the bullock cart. Accordingly accidental death u/s. 174 of IPC was registered, Post Mortem was conducted. Therefore complainant preferred the claim with insurance company on 15.07.2009 annexing all the required documents, but her claim was neither dec...
M/S. Ajeeth Seeds Ltd. Rep. by Its Managing Director and Another Vs. L ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-27-2014
Oral Order: (Gopala Krishna Tamada, President) 1) The Opposite Parties in CC 20/2012 before the Dist. Forum,Ananthapurare the appellants, and this appeal is directed against the order dt. 6.4.2013 in CC No. 20/2012 wherein the Dist. Forum has awarded an amount of Rs.2,250/- towards cost of seeds, Rs.5,000/- towards expenditure, Rs.1,500/- towards Commissioners fee, Rs.30,000/- towards crop loss and Rs.1,000/- towards costs of the complaint. 2) Brief facts that led to filing of the present appeal are as follows. For the sake of brevity the parties are described as shown in the complaint. The complainant is a resident of Kondamanayunipalyam Village of Kadiri Mandal, in Anantapur District. He is an agriculturist. Op1 is the dealer in seeds and fertilizers and Op2 is the manufacturer of Hybrid Maize Seeds. The complainant submits that being attracted by the advertisement etc., made by the opposite parties about high yield variety of hybrid maize seeds, he purchased three packets of Hybrid ...
P.J. Sunny Vs. Joy George
Court: Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram
Decided on: Jan-27-2014
P.Q. Barkath Ali : President This is an appeal filed by the complainant in CC 132/2012 on the file of Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Pathanamthitta challenging the order of the Forum dated 27/07/2012 dismissing the complaint. 2. The case of the complainant as testified by him as PW1 before the Forum and as detailed in the complaint in brief is this:- The respondent/opposite party is the Managing Director of Regency Travels and Tours Pathanamthitta. For obtaining employment visa to Canada and UK, the complainant paid Rs.1 lakh as processing fees to the opposite party on 31/05/2007, In September 2007 complainant paid an additional amount to Rs.1,50,000/- for documentation purpose. But the opposite party failed to arrange the visa for the complainant. The opposite party failed to return the money paid by the complainant. Therefore complainant filed the complaint claiming that amount. 3. The opposite party in his version contented thus:- The receipt of Rs.2,50,000/- from the complainan...
Vinlab Export Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Neera Lauhan
Court: Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
Decided on: Jan-27-2014
C.C. Pant, Member: 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 20.11.2003 passed by the District Forum, Haridwar in consumer complaint No. 05 of 2002, thereby allowing the consumer complaint and directing the opposite parties, jointly or severally, to pay to the complainant a sum of Rs. 10,250/- towards cost of the seeds, Rs. 25,000/- as compensation, Rs. 4,000/- towards cost of sowing the seeds and Rs. 1,000/- as litigation expenses within a month from the date of the order. 2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the complainant “ Smt. Neera Lauhan had purchased 7000 gladiolus bulbs (seeds of gladiolus flower) worth Rs. 10,250/- from M/s Vinlab Export Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow (herein after referred as œcompany?). When the complainant received the gladiolus bulbs, she found that the bulbs were of inferior quality and were infected. She contacted Sh. Ashutosh Srivastava, representative and authorized signatory of the company“opposite party No. 1 ove...
The Principal S.U.S. College of Engineering and Technology Vs. Bhavnee ...
Court: Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chandigarh
Decided on: Jan-27-2014
(Order) Gurcharan Singh Saran, Presiding Judicial Member: 1. The appellant/OP No. 2 (hereinafter called œOP No.2?) has filed the present appeal against the order dated 26.5.2011 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, SAS Nagar, Mohali(hereinafter called œthe District Forum?) in consumer complaint No.169 dated 15.4.2011 vide which the complaint filed by the complainant was allowed with the direction to the opposite parties to refund 29,562/- with interest @ 9% p.a. w.e.f. 16.9.2010 till the date of disbursement and litigation expenses of Rs. 1,500/-. 2. The complaint was filed by the complainant that he took the admission with the Ops in Mechanical Engineering in Ist Semester vide Roll No. 141694 on 15.7.2010 and deposited Rs. 44,750/- as fee vide receipt No. 15.7.2010, however, he could not continue his studies due to unavoidable circumstances and vide letter dated 16.9.2010, he expressed his intention to seek refund of his fee, which was not refunded des...
The Manager, Muthoot FIn Corp Ltd, Muttam, Muttam P.O, Thodupuzha, Idu ...
Court: Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram
Decided on: Jan-27-2014
P.Q. Barkath Ali : President This is an appeal filed by the opposite party in CC 13/2013 challenging the order of the Forum dated Feb 28, 2013 directing the opposite party to return to release to the complainant pledged gold ornaments and to pay compensation of Rs.2,000/- and a cost of Rs.1000/- with interest. 2. The case of the respondent/complainant as detailed in the complaint before the Forum in brief is this: The complainant is an aged lady. She had an aide by name Sasidharan K.K. About one and a half years back she sustained fracture of her shoulder bone. Through the said Sasidharan she pledged her two gold bangles weighing 8 grams each with the opposite party and took Rs.16,000/- for each bangle for treatment expenses. Complainant was made a nominee and the token was kept by Sri. Sasidharan. After a few months Sasidharan absconded. On knowing about the fact that Sasidharn pledged the gold bangles with the opposite party, she approached them and they promised that if the complain...
Kuldeep Kumar Sharma Vs. Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Lt ...
Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh
Decided on: Jan-27-2014
Sh. Dev Raj, Member: 1. The facts, in brief, are that the complainant applied for residential independent floor in Silver Birch situated in Township Project named as Omaxe Chandigarh Extension, Mullanpur, S.A.S. Nagar, Punjab and was allotted Apartment No.OSBC/Type-A/SF/535M, having super area measuring approximately 1150 sq.ft. It was stated that the total cost of the unit was Rs.28,78,000/- and payment was to be made, as per the Construction Linked Plan, progressively, which was required to be intimated by the Opposite Parties. It was further stated that first installment of Rs.2,50,000/- was paid by the complainant to the Opposite Parties on 04.08.2010. It was further stated that, on inquiry by the complainant from the office of the Opposite Parties, with regard to the schedule of payment, he was told that the information would be sent by post. It was further stated that on inquiry, he was informed that, the next installment was due, and he deposited a sum of Rs.2,73,000/- on 24.11....
The Superintendent of Post Offices, Narasaraopet Division Narasaraopet ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-27-2014
T. Ashok Kumar, Member This is an appeal preferred by the opposite party No.1 against the order in C.C.No.46/2012 dated 05-7-2012 on the file of District Forum, Guntur. For convenience sake the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to hereunder: The gist of the complaint is that the complainant opened S.B. account bearing No.1477155000015941 with 2nd opposite party on 16-9-2011 and obtained pass book and at the time of opening account had applied for ATM card. The second opposite party informed the complainant that the A.T.M. card and pin code will be sent by registered post to him. A gold loan of Rs.2,75,000/- was sanctioned by opposite party No.2 bank in favour of the complainant and it was credited to his S.B. account. Thereafter he withdraw Rs.75,000/- on 28-9-2011 and Rs.25,000/- on 05-10-2011 and there is a balance of Rs.1,80,390/- in his account. On 10-10-2011 the complainant went to 2nd opposite party bank to withdraw the cash and came to know that there was a balanc...
Kishan Ramchandra Shelke Vs. Gopal Enterprises and Others
Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad
Decided on: Jan-27-2014
S.M. Shembole, Presiding Judicial Member: 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 16.1.2009 passed by Dist.Consumer Forum Ahmednagar partly allowing consumer complaint No.431/2008 directing respondent/opponent No.1 to pay to the appellant/complainant Rs.20,000/- towards damages with interest @ 10% p.a. and compensation of Rs.20,000/- for causing mental agony and Rs.1000/- more towards cost of the proceedings. (For the sake of brevity appellant is herein after referred as complainant and respondents 1 and 2 as opponent No.1 and 2 respectively. Respondent No.3/opponent No.3 insurance company is already deleted) 2. The brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that:- Complainant Kiran Ramchandra Shelke is an agriculturist. Opponent No.1 Gopal Enterprises is a dealer of Sonalika Tractor and opponent No.2 is its sub-dealer. In the month of April 2008 complainant purchased tractor of Sonalika company bearing registration No.MH-16F-7801 from opponent No.1 and 2 for co...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »