Scdrc Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P.S.E.B. Through Its Chairman the Mall Patiala and Others Vs. M/S. Mad ...
Court: Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chandigarh
Decided on: Jan-22-2014
Baldev Singh Sekhon, Member: 1. This appeal has been filed by the appellants/opposite parties against the order dated 5.12.2007 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Muktsar (in short œDistrict Forum?), vide which the complaint filed by the respondent/complainant was allowed and the demand raised by the opposite parties, vide notice Ex.C-2, being illegal and arbitrary, was set aside and they were directed to pay Rs.500/- as litigation expenses to the complainant. 2. The facts, as stated in the complaint, are that the complainant firm is a partnership firm and Sh.Yashpal Madan is one of its partner. An electric connection, bearing account No.AT-29/0498 under Non- Residential Category with connected load of 64.40 KWs, was installed in its premises. On 5.10.2006, when Additional S.E. Enforcement, PSEB, Bathinda came to this premises for the purpose of checking, no infirmity/illegality was found on its part and all the seals and the glass of meter were found intac...
Senior General Manager Government of India, Dehradun Vs. Anand Swaroop
Court: Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
Decided on: Jan-22-2014
C.C. Pant, Member: 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 14.11.2013 passed by the District Forum, Dehradun in consumer complaint No. 265 of 2011 thereby allowing the consumer complaint and directing the opposite party to pay to the complainant a sum of Rs. 25,000/- as compensation and Rs. 5,000/- towards litigation expenses within a month from the date of the order, failing which the opposite party shall pay an interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing the consumer complaint till the date of payment to the complainant. 2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the complainant Sh. Anand Swaroop had booked the Community Centre œMilan Mandir? of the Ordnance Factory, Raipur, Dehradun on 10.06.2010 for the marriage of his daughter, which was to be solemnized on 27.11.2010 and had paid a sum of Rs. 500/- as an advance rent. However, the opposite party “ Senior General Manager of the Ordnance Factory, Raipur, Dehradun had booked the same (Commun...
British Airways Vs. Dr. Kamal Kumar
Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2014
S.C. Jain, Member: 1) This appeal is preferred by the appellant against the order dt. 22.03.2012 passed by the District Forum-VI, M-Block, New Delhi in Complaint Case No. 276/04. 2) The case pertains to desertion of Indian passengers by foreign airlines at alien land, the facts of the case are that the respondent/complainant is a senior consultant physician in Delhi, he is qualified MBBS, M.D. (M.ED), Gold Medallist, FIACM, MICC, MCSI, MCCP, MAP and is specialist in Hypertension Heart Deceases and Diabetes, he is also attached with many hospitals of repute in Delhi as consultant and is also having his own clinic in Krishna Nagar, Delhi. The respondent/complainant to update his knowledge and to know latest happening and researches all over the world the used to attend conferences and lectures etc. in different parts of the world from time to time and to attend one such conference and lecture at Zurich (Switzerland), the respondent/complainant alongwith many other senior Doctors from all...
Chhayabai Shivaji Bhosale Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Collec ...
Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad
Decided on: Jan-22-2014
S.M. Shembole, Presiding Judicial Member: 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 31.01.2007 passed by District Consumer Forum Hingoli dismissing consumer complaint No.66/06. (For the sake of brevity appellant is hereinafter referred as complainant and respondent as opponent) 2. The brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that:- Late Shivaji Bhosale who was husband of complainant Chhayabai was agriculturist having agriculture land at Amba, Dist.Parbhani. On 5.1.2005 the Government of Maharashtra had obtained Farmers Personal Accidental Insurance Policy for the farmers in Maharashtra from opponent No.3 ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. for sum assured of Rs.1 lakh. On 23.10.2005 insured Late Shivaji Bhosale died in motor-accident while driving motor-cycle. After his death his widow complainant Chhayabai collected necessary papers and submitted insurance claim through opponent No.2 Tahasildar, Wasmat, Dist.Hingoli. However, opponent No.3 insurance company rep...
Nurul Huda Layek Vs. Tapan Kumar Sen and Another
Court: West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-21-2014
Mridula Roy, Member: The instant appeal is directed against the judgement and order dated 30.03.2012 passed by Ld. District Forum, Kolkata, Unit “ I allowing the petition of complaint on contest with cost against the O.P. directing the O.P. to execute the deed of conveyance in respect of the premises as shown in the schedule of the petition of complaint after receipt of the balance amount payable by the Complainants to his credit as per two agreements and directing the Complainants to comply the said order. The Ld. District Forum also passed order in respect of the registration cost as well as the allied cost in process of registration to be borne by the Complainants and directed the O.P. to pay compensation of Rs.25,000/- to the Complainants for harassment and mental agony and to pay Rs.5,000/- towards litigation cost to the Complainants within 45 days. Being aggrieved by this order the O.P. has preferred the instant appeal on the ground that the Ld. District Forum acted upon a...
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.Ltd., Through Junior Eng ...
Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad
Decided on: Jan-21-2014
S.M. Shembole, Presiding Judicial Member: 1. Challenge in this appeal is the judgment and order dated 19.09.2009 passed by District Consumer Forum Nanded partly allowing the consumer complaint No.158/2007 directing opponents/appellants to pay to the complainant damages of Rs.24,200/- with interest @ 9% p.a. and compensation of Rs.5000/- for causing mental agony and Rs.2000/- more towards cost of the proceedings. (For the sake of brevity appellants are hereinafter referred as opponents and respondent as the complainant) 2. The brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that:- Complainant Balaji Shinde is an agriculturist having field Gut No.88 admeasuring 20R and Gut No.89 admeasuring 40R of village Ardhapur, Dist.Nanded. Complainant is a consumer of opponents having electric connection in his field. In the year 2006-07 he had grown sugarcane in his field. On 9.5.2007 due to loose hanging electric wires of the electric lines passing from the field of complainant there was sparking and d...
M/S Kapil Chit Fund (P) Ltd., Rep. by Its Branch Manager Vs. Mahmood K ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-21-2014
R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member 1. The opposite party-chit fund company is the appellant. The respondent filed compliant seeking direction to the respondent-chit fund company to return an amount of Rs.62,755/- with interest @ 24% p.a. and Rs.50,000/- towards compensation. 2. The appellant joined in the chit group bearing reference no. VL03J-27 with therespondent-chit fund company for the chit value of Rs.5 lakh and the monthly subscription payable is Rs.12,500/- in duration of 40 months. The appellant joined the chit group on 28.07.2008 and he participated in the auction conducted on 27.02.2009 as also he was declared successful bidder having agreed to forego Rs.1,75,000/- out of chit value of Rs.5,00,000/-.. The respondent stated to have furnished 6 sureties as required by the appellant-chit fund company. 3. The respondent submitted that his name was removed from membership list on the premise of irregular payment of installments and the appellant informed him about the removal of his ...
Assistant Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.Ltd. ...
Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad
Decided on: Jan-21-2014
S.M. Shembole, Presiding Judicial Member: 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 3.12.2009 passed by District Consumer Forum Dhule partly allowing the consumer complaint No.335/2009 directing appellants/opponents to provide new electric connection to the respondent/complainant to issue electricity bill for the period of six months preceding date of disconnection of electric connection which was in the name of brother of respondent/complainant etc. Further appellants/opponents are directed to pay to the complainant compensation of Rs.5000/- for causing mental agony and Rs.2000/- more towards cost of the proceedings. (For the sake of brevity appellants are hereinafter referred as opponents and respondent as complainant) 2. The brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that:- Complainant Shri.Bajirao Patil is owner of field Gut No.81/1/1 admeasuring 60R of village Mandal, Tq.Shindkheda, Dist.Dhule. There is common well in the same field having shares of complaina...
Branch Manager Icici Bank Ltd. Vs. Majed Khan
Court: West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-21-2014
Kalidas Mukherjee, President: This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by Learned District Forum, Purba Medinipur in CC No.121 of 2007 allowing the complaint and directing the OP to refund Rs.26,396/- towards the amount already paid by Complainant in four instalments. The OP was directed to pay Rs.2 lakh towards compensation for forceful possession and selling the vehicle in question. It was directed that in case of failure to pay the amount within 45 days from the date of communication of the order, the OP will have to pay interest @ 9% p.a. over the total awarded amount till realisation. The case of the Respondent/Complainant, in short, is that he purchased a pick up van taking loan of Rs.1,96,000/- from the OP Bank. There was default in payment of instalment. But on 21/07/07 the OP engaged some persons who forcibly took possession of the vehicle from the driver. The Complainant contacted the OP for the release of the vehicle but they did not pay any heed. For th...
Dr. Uday Sureshrao Shastri Vs. Proprietor, Malani Traders and Another
Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad
Decided on: Jan-21-2014
S.M. Shembole, Presiding Judicial Member: 1. This appeal takes an exception to the judgment and order dated 20.06.2013 passed by District Consumer Forum, Aurangabad dismissing consumer complaint no.692/2008. For the sake of brevity the appellant is hereinafter referred as œcomplainant? and the respondents as œopponents?. 2. Brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that, opponent no.2 H. R. Jonsons India Limited is a tiles manufacturing company. Opponent no.1 proprietor Malani Traders is a dealer of opponent no.2. On 15.07.2008 complainant Dr. Uday Shashtri purchased 50 boxes of tiles of premium quality from opponent no.1. The price of each box was of Rs.495/-. Thus the complainant has purchased tiles worth Rs.24,750/- from opponent no.1 vide purchase voucher no.3683. It is alleged by the complainant that after purchasing the tiles when those tiles were used by fixing in his newly constructed building, it was noticed that the tiles are of sub-standard quality. It is also a...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »