Scdrc Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anup Kr. Saha Vs. West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. ...
Court: West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-27-2014
J. Bag, Ld. Member: The present complaint is directed against the Order dated 26.03.2013 of the Ld. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Howrah, in Complaint Case No. HDF 150 of 2012, whereby Ld. Forum below allowed the complaint on contest against OP Nos. 1 and 2 . The complaint case, in brief, was as follows : The Complainant having purchased a flat in a newly constructed house under Mouza- Bally, J.L. No. 14 within Bally Nishinda Gram Panchayat at North Ghosh Para Rabindra Sarani, Khatian No. 5023 and Dag No. 3094 applied to the OPs on 09.09.2011 for a separate electric meter . After verifying all necessary documents the OPs accepted the application form and the Complainant duly paid a sum of Rs. 200/- as application money . The OPs inspected the Complainants flat within a fortnight but did not take any action for installation of new meter as applied for . The Complainant visited the office of the OP No.2 with the request for installation of the new meter on payment of serv...
Sarojini Rajendra More Vs. the Manager, Maharashtra State Seeds Corpor ...
Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad
Decided on: Jan-27-2014
Uma S. Bora, Member: 1. Sarojini W/o Rajendra More resident of village Ter, Tq.Dist.Osmanabad has filed the present complaint against the Maharashtra State Seeds Corporation through its General Manager and District Manager, Latur and Osmanabad. 2. Complainant is an agriculturist and owner of land Gut No.10 admeasuring 20 acres. Complainant had booked 23000 banana plantlets (tissue culture) from opponents No.3 District office of Maharashtra State Seeds Corporation at Latur. For that purpose complainant deposited Rs.69,000/- as an advance. Complainant is well known agriculturist in the area and having good reputation in the area. Complainant is role model for the other agriculturists in the area. Complainant expressed and inspired by the advertisement issued by opponents regarding Mahalaxmi brand tissue culture banana and decided to carry on farming of banana. Accordingly she booked 23000 plantlets on 17.10.2008. After getting guidelines from opponents complainant prepared her land by in...
The Branch Manager M/S Life Insurance Corporation of India Vuyyur Bran ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-27-2014
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The Opposite Party No.1 Insurance Company is the appellant. The appeal is challenge to the order of the District Forum which allowed the complaint directing the appellant to pay Rs.50,000/- along with vested bonus with 9% interest together with compensation of Rs..10,000/- and costs of Rs.2,000/-. 2. The case of the respondents is that father of the respondents late Saikam Pedanna during his life time obtained insurance policy No.675087487 on 1.4.2007 from the appellant for a sum of Rs.50,000/- on 1.4.2007 on yearly premium Table No.091/15. The respondent no.1 is the nominee to the policy. The policy came into force from 1.4.2007. On 19.2.2008, the father of the respondents no.1 died due to heart attack. The respondent no.1 approached the appellant and informed about the death of her father and on their advice she submitted claim form along with necessary documents. The respondent no.2 is not the nominee as per the contents of the policy...
Mohd. Abdul Rahman and Another Vs. Dr. Salman
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-27-2014
Oral Order: (S. Bhujanga Rao, Member) The unsuccessful complainant filed the appeal against the order dt.23.07.2013 of the District Forum-1, Hyderabad made in C.C.No.214/2011, where under, the complaint filed by the appellants/complainants against the respondent/opposite party doctor, alleging medical negligence and claiming Rs.2 lakhs towards compensation etc. was dismissed by the District Forum observing that the complainants failed to prove their case against the opposite party. For the sake of convenience, the parties are described as they arrayed in the complaint. The case of the appellant/complainant as set out in the complaint in brief is as follows: The complainant and his brothers are living jointly with their mother Smt. Neerunnisa Begum. While so, on 25.11.2010 during the marriage of their 6th brother Mohd.Ajaz, at about 8 p.m. some crackers were burnt, due to which, the complainant no.2 sustained minor burnt injuries to his right hand and so he was taken to the doctor, who ...
Purshottam Vs. the Oriental Insurance Company Limited
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-25-2014
Oral (Order) 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 15.02.2013, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Janjgir (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum") in Complaint Case No.10/2011, whereby the complaint of the appellant/ complainant, has been dismissed 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint case filed by the appellant/complainant before the District Forum are : that the appellant/complainant, is registered owner of the tractor bearing registration No. C.G.11-D-1244. The said vehicle was insured with respondent/O.P. under Policy No.192490/47/20/10755 for the period from 17.03.2010 to 16.03.2011. On 02.01.2011, the said tractor bearing registration No.C.G.11-D-1244 caught fire and badly damaged. The matter was reported to the Police Station and uqdlkuh iapukek loss panchanama, repairing bill, insurance policy, R.C. book were sent to the respondent/O.P., but the respondent/O.P. wrongly repudiated the claim of the appellant/complainant on the ground tha...
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd, Vs. Bandhan Kunwar and Another
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-25-2014
(Order) R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 04.04.2013 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bilaspur (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum") in Complaint Case No.CC/2012/06. By the impugned order, the District Forum allowed the complaint of the complainant and directed the appellant / OP no.1 to pay a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs only) to the complainant / respondent no.1 along with interest @ 7% p.a. and also awarded Rs.1,000/- as cost of litigation within two months from the date of order, otherwise, the aforesaid amount will be payable along with interest @ 9% p.a. 2. The facts of the complaint case filed before the District Forum are that the complainant /respondent no.1, Smt. Bandhan Kunwar is the mother of Late Chhatar Singh. Late Chhatar Singh was an employee of respondent no.2 / OP no.2 / S.E.C.L. and he was insured with appellant/O.P.No.1 through his employer O.P.No.2/S.E.C.L. The insurance was effective for the p...
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Vs. Lalli Bai and Another
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-25-2014
Oral (Order) 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 10.05.2012, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bilaspur (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum") in Complaint Case No.79/2009, whereby the complaint of the respondent No.1/ complainant, has been allowed. 2. The appellant/O.P.No.1 has preferred this appeal against the impugned order dated 10.05.2012 passed by the District Forum and also filed application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 3. We have heard arguments of learned counsel for both the parties on the application for condonation of delay and have also perused the record of the District Forum. 4. In Revision Petition No.1616 of 2011 - National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Shri P. Rangaswamy and anr, decided on 11.11.2013, Hon'ble National Commission held thus : "8. In Ram Lal and others Vs. Rewa Coalfields Ltd., AIR 1962 Supreme Court 361, it has been observed :- It is, however, necessary to emphasize that even after sufficient cause ...
Ufnath Singh Vs. Deepak Agrawal, Proprietor and Manager and Others
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-25-2014
Oral (Order) 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 18.07.2013, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Surguja, Ambikapur (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum") in Complaint Case No.142/2012, whereby the complaint of the appellant/complainant, has been allowed. 2. The appellant/complainant has preferred this appeal against the impugned order dated 18.07.2013, passed by the District Forum and also filed application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 3. We have heard arguments of learned counsel for appellant on the application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, for condonation of delay and have also perused the record of the District Forum. 4. In Revision Petition No.1616 of 2011 - National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Shri P. Rangaswamy and anr., decided on 11.11.2013, Hon'ble National Commission held thus : "8. In Ram Lal and others Vs. Rewa Coalfields Ltd., AIR 1962 Supreme Court 361, it has bee...
Magma Finance Corporation Limited, and Others Vs. Jugal Kishore Singh ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-25-2014
(Order) R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This order will govern disposal of Appeal No. FA/12/298 as well as Appeal No. FA/12/307, which have been preferred respectively by the OPs and complainant of Complaint Case No.43/2010 against the order dated 22.05.2012 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Surguja, Ambikapur (C.G.) (henceforth called œDistrict Forum?), whereby the complaint filed by the complainant, has been allowed in part, and learned District Forum has directed the OPs to pay the complainant a sum of Rs.4,30,000/- along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 09.04.2010 and also pay a sum of Rs.3,000/- as compensation for physical and mental agony and inconvenience suffered by the complainant and Rs.1,000/- as advocate fee. The District Forum has further directed that if the complainant has received the amount of Rs.56,497/- which was sent by the OPs to him after sale of the vehicle bearing registration no.C.G.15-B-4029 vide bank draft N...
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Dhansay and Another
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-25-2014
(Order) R.S. Sharma President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 19.12.2012 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Korea, Baikunthpur (C.G.) (henceforth called "District Forum") in Complaint Case No.89/2012. By the impugned order, the District Forum allowed the complaint of the complainant/respondent No.1 and directed the appellant / O.P. no.1 to deposit a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs only) with District Forum, along with interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint, for payment of the same to the complainant. The District Forum also awarded Rs.2,000/- as cost of litigation to the complainant and further directed that if the aforesaid amount is not deposited within 45 days, the same will be payable along with interest @ 12% p.a. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the complaint case filed before the District Forum are as under :- 2.1. That the complainant /respondent no.1, is permanent employee of S.E.C.L. and he was insured with the...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »