Rajasthan Court June 2011 Judgments
Gordhani Bai Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-29-2011
1. By way of the instant Criminal Misc. Petition, the petitioner Gordhan Bai has impugned the order dated 23rd July, 2005, whereby the Additional Sessions Judge, Chabbra, District Baran, dismissed the revision petition and upheld the order dated 2nd August, 2004, whereby the learned Judicial Magistrate, Atru accepted the Final Report given by the SHO, Police Station, Atru in the case pertaining to FIR No. 405/2002 registered for the offence under Section 376 of Indian Penal Code. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Public Prosecutor and carefully perused the impugned order. 3. Having considered the submissions made at the bar and carefully scanned the impugned order, it is noticed that one FIR No. 405/2002 came to be registered at Police Station, Atru in the offence under Section 376 of Indian Penal Code. The police, after completion of investigation, did not find any evidence against Pushp Dayal S/o Ram Chandra Dhakad for the allegation of rape having been ...
Tag this Judgment!Shankar Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-23-2011
1. Heard learned counsel for the accused-appellant and learned public prosecutor for the State. 2. The accused-appellant, who has been convicted and sentenced for the offence punishable under Sections 302 of IPC and Section 3/25 (1-B) (a) of Arms Act, has applied for temporary bail/suspension of sentence for providing better treatment to his ailing wife, who is suffering from fibroid disease uterus and she has been advised for operation. A photocopy of the certificate issued by the Dr. Jay Lakhtakia, Jr. Specialist, Government Referral Hospital, Rajgarh, District Churu has been filed along with the bail application whereby the petitioner's wife has been advised for operation/surgery. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-appellant may be granted temporary bail for a period of thirty days to attend his ailing wife and for better treatment as his father is an old person. He further submits that earlier also the accused-appellant was released on temporary bail by ...
Tag this Judgment!Mohd. Rafiq Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-23-2011
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner by this habeas corpus writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has approached this Court with the case that he got married as per Muslim Rites with detenue, namely, Jubeda Khatoon @ Sangeeta D/o Shanker Lal Prajapat (Respondent No.4) on 29.05.2011, however, after marriage with the present petitioner, the respondent No.4 lodged an FIR regarding missing of his daughter at Police Station Swaroopganj; and that he had taken forcibly his wife (Jubeda Khatoon @ Sangeeta) with him. The petitioner claims that after marriage with Jubeda Khatoon @ Sangeeta, he is entitled for legal custody of detenue, Jubeda Khatoon @ Sangeeta; and now she is in illegal custody of respondent No.4. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner urged that the petitioner is ready to bear the cost of production of the said detenue in the Court to ascertain her wishes. 4. Having considered the submissions made at bar by the learned counsel for ...
Tag this Judgment!Hari Krishna Arya Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-17-2011
1. This intra-court appeal is directed against the order dated 24.05.2011 whereby the learned Single Judge of this Court has dismissed the writ petition (CWP No.4608/2011) filed by petitionerappellant in the third attempt to challenge the validity of the transfer order dated 19.07.2010. 2. The learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition by a short order that reads as under:- “Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Earlier S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10036/2010 filed by the petitioner challenging the validity of transfer order dated 19th of July, 2010 was dismissed by this Court on 18th of April, 2011. Now again the petitioner is challenging the validity of same transfer order dated 19th of July, 2010 by way of filing present writ petition so also the order dated 11.5.2011 passed upon the representation filed by the petitioner before the respondents. In my opinion, transfer is an incident of service. No employee can claim for posting him at the place as per his choice...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›