Rajasthan Court May 2011 Judgments

May 06 2011

Ramkunwar Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan Jaipur

Decided on: May-06-2011

1.Relying on the cases of Angana & Anr. v. State of Rajasthan [(2009) 3 SCC 767], Takht Singh & Ors. v. State of M.P. [(2001) 10 SCC 463], and Dara Singh v. State of Rajasthan [S.B. Cr. Misc. Second Bail (for Suspension of Sentence) Application No.9/2010, in S.B. Criminal Appeal No.575/2008, decided on 25.01.2011], Mr. Harendra Singh, the learned counsel for the appellant, has vehemently argued that in case the accused-appellant has served a substantial part of his sentence and in case the criminal appeal cannot be decided within the remaining period of the sentence, then the sentence of the accused-appellant should be suspended. According to him, the accused-appellant has already served three years and eleven months out of the seven years of his sentence. Thus, he has undergone a substantial part of his sentence.2. On the other hand, Mrs. Alka Bhatnagar, the learned Public Prosecutor, has contended that even the cases referred by the learned counsel for the appellant do not lay down a...

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 2011

Chothmal Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others

Court: Rajasthan Jaipur

Decided on: May-04-2011

Summary...

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 2011

Sahukar Vs. State of Rajasthan.

Court: Rajasthan Jaipur

Decided on: May-04-2011

1. Aggrieved by the order dated 28.02.2011, passed by the Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Alwar ('the Board', for short), whereby the learned Magistrate had denied the benefit of bail to the petitioner, and also aggrieved by the order dated 11.03.2011, passed by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Alwar, whereby the learned Judge has upheld the order dated 28.02.2011, the petitioner has approached this Court. The brief facts of the case are that one Smt. Batuli had lodged a report at Police Station Ramgarh, District Alwar wherein she alleged that the petitioner had ravished her fourteen years old daughter. On the basis of the said report, the police chalked out a formal FIR, FIR No.174/2010 for offences under 363, 366 and 376/511 IPC. However, as the petitioner was a juvenile, his case was placed before the learned Board. Vide order dated 28.02.2011, the learned Board dismissed his bail application under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of the ...

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 2011