Rajasthan Court June 2010 Judgments
Mohan Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-22-2010
Kailash Chandra Joshi, J.1. By this D.B. Criminal (Jail) Appeal, appellants Mohan Singh, Mane Singh alias Maniya and Devi Singh, have assailed the judgment and order dated 06-12-2003 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track), Rajsamand, Camp Udaipur (for short, 'the trial Court' hereinafter), whereby the appellants have been convicted for the offences under Sections 302/34 and 341 IPC and sentenced to imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 1000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo three months simple imprisonment for the offence under Section 302/34 IPC; and one months' simple imprisonment for the offence under Section 341 IPC.2. The facts of the case, in succinct, are that on 02-12-2002, complainant Manna Lal Gamar lodged a written report with Police Station, Ogana to the effect that at 8.00 p.m. on the day before, his father Rajmal, who was coming home alongwith Bheru Singh and Dharam Chand, was attacked by some unknown persons and murdered while attacking ...
Tag this Judgment!Banshidhar Parwal Vs. Vijay Kumar Alani and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-11-2010
R.S. Chauhan, J.1. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 29-8-2008, passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division) West Jaipur City, Jaipur, and judgment and decree dated 23-2-2010, passed by Additional District Judge (Fast Track) No. 3, Jaipur City, Jaipur, the appellant has filed this second appeal before this Court.2. In a short compass, the facts of the case are that the appellant had filed a civil suit against respondents defendants for declaration and mandatory injunction in relation to a Chabutara (a Platform) measuring 11.9 ft. X 9.9 ft., situated in front of shop No. A-11/1, Chandpole Anaj Mandi, Jaipur. According to the appellant, the said platform was not sold to the respondents. In fact, vide sale-deed dated 19-9-1992, only a shop A-11/1, having an area 29.61 sq. meter, was sold by the appellant to the respondents. However, the respondents have encroached upon the said platform by putting iron- bars and by keeping their articles/ goods on the platform. According to the appell...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›