Rajasthan Court April 2010 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mani Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-02-2010
1. By the order dated 28.2.2003 learned Addl. Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No. 2, Banswara convicted the appellant for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life term with a fine of Rs. 1000/- and further to undergo three months' rigorous imprisonment in the event of default in making payment of fine.2. The case of the prosecution is that PW-1 Toliya submitted an oral report on 28.7.2002 at 8.45 pm with assertion that he married with Reshmi D/o Weja resident of Tadi Mahudi, Police Station - Banswara about 20 years back. Toliya and Reshmi remained as husband and wife for a period of ten years but because of some dispute Reshmi proceeded to her father's home. After remaining with father for a period of about 3 years Reshmi entered into a Nata with Mani Lal S/o Dhirji Masar resident of Badi Sand, Police Station - Sallopat, District - Banswara. After staying for a period of about 5 years with Mani Lal, Reshmi again came to her fa...
RohIn Meena and anr. Vs. Rajasthan University of Health Science and or ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-02-2010
Ajay Rastogi, J.1. It is a petition filed by two petitioners jointly in the peculiar circumstances.2. The petitioners appeared in Rajasthan Pre-Medical Test-2007 and after passing the same, were admitted in Ist MBBS Course. After completion of one year of regular course, the petitioners appeared in the First MBBS Examination held in the month of July, 2008. However, they failed in the subject of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry. The petitioners thereafter appeared in First MBBS (Remanded) Examination-December-2008 in all the above mentioned three papers the result of which was declared by the University on 07/02/2009 in which the petitioners were declared fail in the subjects of Anatomy and Biochemistry. Copy of mark-sheets has been placed on record as Anx. 1.2. At this stage, the University suo-motu took a decision providing opportunity to the students to apply for reevaluation in Anatomy subject which was circulated to the students vide order dated 16/20.02.2009 (Anx.2).3. In vie...
Gopal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-02-2010
Gopal Krishan Vyas, J.1. In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing order dated 19.09.2001 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in Original Application No. 218/1997 and prayed that order dated 16.05.1997 passed by respondent No. 3 may be quashed and set aside and, further, respondents may be directed to promote the petitioner on the post of Senior Clerk in the grade of Rs. 1200-2040 with effect from 12.02.1995 when he actually eligibility for promotion to the next higher post in Group - C under the Railways service.2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed in the year 1993 in the Western Railway on the post of Office Clerk in the grade of Rs. 950-1500 vide order dated 12.04.1993. The petitioner moved an application in the Western Railway for his transfer from Western Railway to Northern Railway at Jodhpur and, in the application so filed by the petitioner, it was specifically mentioned that he is ready to accept the bottom seniority in...
Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Devi Lal Sahu
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-01-2010
Dinesh Maheshwari, J.1. This intra-court appeal is directed against the order dated 04.09.2008 passed in CWP No. 5158/2004 whereby the learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition filed by the respondent Devi Lal Sahu (hereinafter also referred to as the writ-petitioner), quashed the impugned order dated 10.11.2003 passed by the Summary Security Force Court ('the SSF Court'/'the SSFC') along with consequential other order, and held the writ-petitioner entitled to all the consequential benefits.2. This intra-court appeal has been taken up for final disposal at this stage in the background that after condonation of delay in filing, a co-ordinate Division Bench proceeded to admit this appeal on 06.04.2009; and, while permitting expeditious hearing of the appeal, passed the order on the prayer for interim relief to the effect that the appellant shall pay 50% of the last drawn salary including emoluments to the respondent w.e.f. 01.04.2009 and, upon compliance of this condition, the opera...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›