Rajasthan Court May 2009 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shehjad Khan and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-01-2009
Reported in: 2009(3)WLN146
Mohammad Rafiq, J.1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the notification dt. 25.07.2006 issued under Section 4 and notification dt. 06.08.2007 issued under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 by which respondents sought to acquire lands of the petitioners in Khasra No. 374 in Village Kehrani, Tehsil Tijara, District Alwar with chowk of other adjoining lands.2. Notice of this writ petition was issued on 20.04.2009 and copy of the petition was supplied to the learned Additional Government Counsel.3. Learned Counsel for the petitioners has cited the judgment of co-ordinate Bench of this Court on Sumer Khan and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors., SBCWP No. 7103/2007 and 23 other writ petitions decided on 02.04.2009. In that very petition, very same questions were challenged on the ground that there is no compliance of Section 5A(2) of the Act of 1894. Writ petitions were allowed by a detailed judgment, operative part of which, is reproduced hereunder:I...
Chambal (Smt.) Vs. Kishan Lal
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-01-2009
Reported in: 2009(3)WLN90
Bhanwaroo Khan, J.1. Claimant-appellants have preferred this miscellaneous appeal, under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for enhancement of the award dt. 21.06.2000 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jaipur and the Rajasthan State Co-operative Tribunal, Jaipur in M.A.C.T. Case No. 1426/1995, wherein the compensation in a sum of Rs. 2,67,440/- was awarded in favour of the claimant-appellants.2. Brief facts of the case are that on 24.09.1995 at about 6.00 A.M. when deceased Kaluwa Khan was sitting on cot in front of his house, Truck bearing No. RJ-10-G-0108 being driven rashly and negligently by the respondent No. 1, struck Kaluwa Khan, who died on the spot.3. In the claim petition, two witnesses were examined on behalf of the claimant-appellants and documentary evidence from Exhibit 1 to Exhibit 10 were produced. No defence was led on behalf of the respondents. The learned Tribunal after going through the oral as well as documentary evidence decided the compensati...
Vikas Kumar Vs. State and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-01-2009
Reported in: 2009(2)WLN120
Ajay Rastogi, J.1. Instant petition has been filed by petitioner with the grievance that minimum age which was referred to by the respondents in the process which was initiated for holding Examination AIEEE-2007 with regard to B.Tech., is unreasonable and was in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.2. Petitioner's date of birth as referred to in instant petition is 23.12.1992. After having qualified AIEEE examination for admission to B.Tech course, he was permitted to join B.Tech (1st year) in direct category while allowing respondent No. 3-College where he deposited requisite fee on 23.08.2007 and after undergoing his regular studies, petitioner submitted his examination form which was sent to respondent No. 2. However, through Internet, petitioner came across of his candidature being rejected on the premise that he was under-age at the time of admission to B.Tech. Course and since examination was to commence from 31.01.2008, at this stage, approached this Court and vi...
Dr. Mohan Lal Gupta Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-01-2009
Reported in: 2009(2)WLN359
Prakash Tatia, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. The petitioner who is qualified to hold the post of Medical Officer was subjected to process of selection and thereafter his appointment order was issued on 02.12.1996 certifying as under:;g ekf.kr fd;k tkrk gS fd ;g fu;qfDr fpfdRlk ,oa LokLF; lsok fu;e] 1963 ds v/khu HkrhZ ,oa lsok dh krksaZ dks fofu;fer djus okys fu;e micU/kh ds vuqlj.k esa nh xbZ gS rFkk dkfeZd foHkkx ds vknsk ekad ,Q&9 (20) dkfeZd (d&2) 73 fnukad 21-01-1974 }kjk fufgr vko;d izek.k i= Hkh cuk;s x;s gSA inxzg.k ds fy;s ;k=k Hkkk vuqns; ugha gksxkA3. The petitioner thereafter sought another appointment under Rajasthan Rural Medical and Health Services Rules, 2008 (for short 'the Rules of 2008') wherein also, he was found suitable and selected vide order dt. 29.09.2008 (Annex. P/2). The petitioner was not appointed on the said post of Rural Medical Officer for which he was selected vide order dt. 29.09.2008 on account of the fact that a case under the provisi...
Khalil Ahmed and ors. Vs. Lrs of Late Shri Chhotu
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-01-2009
Reported in: RLW2010(1)Raj380
Gopal Krishan Vyas, J.1. This is second appeal under Section 100, C.P.C. filed by the defendants against judgment and decree dated 22.11.2008 passed by the Addl. District Judge, Parbatsar in Civil Appeal No. 13/2006, by which, judgment and decree dated 20.05.2006 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Makrana in Civil Suit No. 07/91 (04/2004) was affirmed.2. According to facts of the case, plaintiff-respondent filed suit for permanent injunction and partition before the trial Court. The trial Court after instituting the suit issued notice to the defendant-appellants and; thereafter, reply was filed by the defendant. On the basis of the pleadings of the parties, following issues were framed by the trial Court:01- vk;k oknxzLr Hkwfe ekdZ th-,p-vkbZ-,Q of.kZr ifjf'k'V ^^v** esa oknhx.k dk vk/kk fgLlk gS ,oa oknhx.k oknxzLr Hkwfe dk caVokjk djkus ds vf/kdkjh gSoknhx.k02- vk;k izfroknh] oknxzLr Hkwfe ij oknhx.k ds vf/kiR; esa gLr{ksi dj jgk gS ftlds fy, oknhx.k LFkkbZ fu'ks/kkKk dh fM...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›