Rajasthan Court November 2009 Judgments
Anita JaIn (Smt.) Vs. Rajendra Kumar Jain
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-30-2009
Reported in: RLW2010(1)Raj485
G.S. Sarraf, J.1. This appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 20.12.1999 passed by Judge, Family Court No. 2, Jaipur whereby the application filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act; 1955 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') by the respondent has been allowed and the marriage solemnized between the respondent and the appellant has been dissolved by passing a decree of divorce.2. Briefly stated the facts as narrated in the application filed by the respondent under Section 13 of the Act on 1.11.1996 are that his marriage was solemnized with the appellant on 7.5.1985. Two sons were born, namely, Saptsheel and Anant on 19.11.88 and 14.11.89 respectively from the wedlock of the parties. The appellant was not happy with the marriage and from the beginning the appellant was behaving in a manner derogatory to the respondent and his family members. Inspite of the best efforts made by the respondent behaviour of the appellant did not change. The respondent complained of the b...
Tag this Judgment!Bhagat Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-21-2009
Reported in: 2009(2)WLN238
H.R. Panwar, J.1. By the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has challenged the order Annex. 8 dt. 03.05.2006 and Annex. 9 dt. 17.12.2005, declining to grant disability benefit cover under Army Group Insurance Fund and seeks direction to the respondent No. 2 and 3 to grant benefit of disability benefit cover to the petitioner from the Army Group Insurance Fund with interest from the date such benefit became due.2. Briefly stated, the facts, which are relevant and necessary for decision of this writ petition are that the petitioner was enrolled in Indian Army as combatant member on the post of Sepoy on 12.08.1987. During his service tenure, he earned rank of Havildar. However, the petitioner was discharged on 31.01.2005 by the respondent Army authorities, on medical ground as he was placed under low medical category-BEE(P) vide Annex. 1. The respondent Army authorities recommended for grant of disability pension to the petitioner. While boarding o...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Myadi Through L.Rs. Vs. Smt. Ratni Through L.Rs.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-05-2009
Reported in: RLW2010(1)Raj500
S.P. Pathak, J.1. This second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 17th February, 1994 passed by the Additional Civil Judge, Jhunjhunu allowing Civil Appeal No. 21/1991 (10/1991) against the judgment and decree dated 29th January, 1991 passed by the Munisff & Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Navalgarh whereby dismissing Civil Sut No. 66/1979.2. Briefly stated, the facts are that the plaintiff- respondent filed a suit for ejectment on 20.12.1979 against Banshidhar who died during the pendency of the suit on the ground of default and necessity for his son. It was, inter-alia, averred in the plaint that the suit shop was let-out on rent @ Rs. 16/- per month and a rent-note was executed on 1.9.19763. The defendant in his written statement denied the submissions made in the plaint and it was, inter-alia, averred that regular payments were made and no default was committed. It was also averred that the suit was filed to...
Tag this Judgment!Kalooram Vs. Allanoor and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-05-2009
Reported in: RLW2009(1)Raj621
Gopal Krishan Vyas, J.1. The instant appeal has been filed under Order 43 Rule 1 CPC read with Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1939 read with Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 against the order dated 24.9.1994 passed by Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Nagaur in Civil Misc. Case No. 4/94.2. According to the facts of the case, a claim petition was filed by respondent Nos. 1 and 2 for compensation because son of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 died in an accident occurred on 28.11.1981 upon the road situated in between Nagaur to Mundawa due to rash and negligent driving of appellant Kalu Ram. Learned trial Court passed as award on 17.8.1992 whereby compensation of Rs. 1,08,400/- along with interest @ 12% from the date of filing claim which is dated 22.4.1982 was allowed. The said award was passed ex-parte against the appellant Kalu Ram and one Ram Bux and according to the award 50% of liability was imposed upon the Insurance Company and for rest of the amount appellant Kalu Ram ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›