Rajasthan Court January 2009 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Manju (Mst.) Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-22-2009
Reported in: RLW2009(4)Raj3097
ORDERMahesh Chandra Sharma, J.1. This revision petition has been filed against the order dated April 22, 2008 of Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No. 2 Bundi, in Sessions Case No. 79 of 2009 whereby he acquitted the accused respondent for the offence under Section 376/511 IPC and convicted him for the offence under Section 354 IPC but looking to his age he was given the benefit of Probation of Offenders Act and he was directed to give personal bond in the amount of Rs. 5000/- for keeping peace and be of good behaviour for two years and shall not repeat such offences for two years.2. Brief facts of the case are that on April 17, 2007, when the prosecutrix went to field of Ramgopal Gurjar, the accused respondent Raju caught hold of her and tried to rape her. The complainant appeared before the Superintendent of Police Bundi on April 17, 2007 and submitted written report regarding incident. After investigation the Police submitted charge sheet against the accused for the offence und...
Punna Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-22-2009
Reported in: 2009(2)WLN440
N.P. Gupta, J.1. The appellant had filed this appeal through jail, seeking to challenge the judgment of learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Phalodi dt. 18.04.2002, convicting him for the offences under Section 460, 394 and 302 IPC, and sentencing to various terms of imprisonment, and of fine, and also awarding various punishments in default of payment of fine; The highest being imprisonment for life, under Section 302 IPC.2. The facts of the case are, that on 10.04.2000, one Umaram P.W. 11 lodged a report Ex. P/2, at 12 PM, at Police Station Phalodi, to the effect, that he lives along with his children in the old Dhani, while Dhani is erected in a field at Hanumanpura, where his father Surajan Ram and mother Paru lives. It is then alleged, that on that day at about 10 AM Heera Ram S/o Babu Ram Bishnoi came to him and told, that while going to Ramdevra, Heera Ram went into the Dhani of his father, and saw that the informant's father and mother are lying dead, who have been killed by somebody ...
Sunil Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-22-2009
Reported in: RLW2010(1)Raj98
S.P. Pathak, J.1. This criminal appeal Under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed against the judgment and order dated 20th September, 2005 passed by the learned Special Judge, Mahila Atrocities & Dowry Cases, Jaipur City, Jaipur in Sessions case No. 37/2005 by which the accused appellant was convicted and sentenced as under:Under Section 363 IPC: 3 years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 100/-Under Section 366 IPC: 4 years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 100/-Under Section 376(2) r/w 511 IPC: 5 years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 100/-In default of payment of fine to further undergo three months simple imprisonment for each offence. All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.2. The facts for the disposal of the present appeal in brief are that PW. 5 Geeta submitted a written report Ex. P. 6 in Police Station Kotputli district Jaipur with the allegation that on 15.2.2005 at about 3.00 p.m. while she along with her daughter aged 5 yea...
Adesh Saint Vs. Dr. Pramod Bhatnagar
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-21-2009
Reported in: RLW2009(4)Raj3065
Mahesh Chandra Sharma, J.1. This revision petition has been filed by the complainant Adesh Saint, against the order dated August 17, 2002 of Additional Sessions Judge No. 4 Kota whereby revision No. 33 of 2002 was allowed and rejected the application under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and the order dated January 31, 2002 of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No. 2 Kota was set aside.2. Brief facts of the case are that a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act was filed in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Kota by the petitioner Adesh Saint through power of attorney holder Smt. Shanti Saint, his mother, against the respondent Dr. Pramod Bhatnagar stating that the respondent has taken an amount of Rs. 50,000/- as loan from the petitioner and against this a cheque was given to the petitioner by Pramod Bhatnagar on August 12, 1999. The petitioner submitted the cheque in the concerned Bank and the same was bounced and returned wi...
Rsrtc Vs. Balbeer Singh and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-21-2009
Reported in: RLW2009(2)Raj1394
R. S. Chauhan, J.1. A serious accident occurred in the dead of the night of 18-2-2002, causing death of twelve persons and injuring to three persons. An award dated 19-8-2006 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Jhunjhunu ('the Tribunal' for short) has brought 15 appeals before this court.2. In the instant appeal the appellant Corporation has challenged the award whereby its claim, for the damages to the bus, was rejected.3. Brief facts of the case are that on 18-2-2002 around fifteen persons were travelling in a Marshal jeep, bearing registration No. HR-20F/2370, towards Salasar. Around eight kilometers after Jhunjhunu and about twenty seven kilometers from police station Nawalgarh, around 11.30 at night the said Marshal jeep collided with a bus belonging to the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation ('the Corporation' for short). The accident was so serious that out of fifteen passengers, eight passengers died on the spot, and seven passengers were referred to the Hospital. O...
State of Rajasthan Vs. Doonga
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-21-2009
Reported in: RLW2009(3)Raj2530
Mahesh Bhagwati, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment dated 5th April, 1989, rendered by District and Sessions Judge, Bundi whereby the accused respondent Doonga was acquitted in the offence under Section 376 of CPC.2. The prosecution version as unfolded during trial is as under:That on 1st of March, 1988 at 10.00 AM PW/3 Moti Lal gave a verbal report to SHO Police Station, Basoli stating that a day before he had gone to attend one marriage at village Khemna being solemnized in the house of his brother-in-law. When he came back to his village Padal in the evening hours, he found 2-5 persons having assembled there. On being enquired, his wife told him that their daughter Ramdhani had gone to Patiyalwala Kuan to supervise the field. The accused Doonga was also supervising the crop of wheat in his field. It is alleged that at about 3-4 PM the accused Doonga caught hold of their daughter Ramdhani, aged 7 years and ravished her, as a result of which her private parts started ble...
Naresh Chand Vs. Smt. Premlata Bakshi
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-20-2009
Reported in: RLW2009(1)Raj784; 2009(1)WLN266
Vineet Kothari, J.1. This second appeal of the defendant - tenant pending for last 18 years in this Court was admitted on the following substantial question of law framed by this Court on 6.9.1991:Can the dead-man's personal necessity be a ground for ejectment2. The plaintiff Smt. Premlata Bakshi W/o Sh. Mangal Singh Bakshi, who expired before filing of the second appeal by the defendant filed the eviction suit against the defendant - appellant in the year 1981 on the ground of personal bonafide necessity of her husband and son who was engaged as Inspector in the National Insurance Company in respect of residential house situated at 24, Chitragupt Marg, Udaipur, which was let out under an oral agreement to the defenadnt on 15.3.1969 for a sum of R&.80/- per month as rent. The bonafide need of the landlord was claimed on the ground that her son is getting married on 1.7.1979 and after retirement of her husband, he intends to work as property valuer and consultant Engineer, therefore, th...
Vinod Kumar Meena and anr. Vs. State of Raj. and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-20-2009
Reported in: RLW2009(1)Raj779
Bhanwaroo Khan, J.1. On 2.5.2007, FIR No. 408/2007 was lodged by Devendra Pal Singh, father of Anjali Chaudhary at the police station, Gangapur City with the averments that a report regarding missing of his daughter Anjali was lodged on 30.4.2007 but on 2.5.2007 he came to know about adduction of his daughter by Bheem Singh, wife of Bheem Singh, Urmila, Vinod Meena and mother of Vinod Meena for the purposes of getting her married with Vinod and for extorting an amount of rupees five lacs. During investigation Anjali was recovered and her statements under Section 164 Cr.P.C. were recorded. She was also subjected to medical examination. The police after investigation submitted challan against the petitioner Vinod Kumar under Sections 363 and 376 IPC in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gangapur City and the ACJM Gangapur City by order dated 20.9.2007 took cognizance of the offence under Sections 363 and 376 IPC against petitioner Vinod and by the order dated 28.9.2007 co...
Ram Sahal Vs. State and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-20-2009
Reported in: RLW2009(1)Raj782
Mahesh Chandra Sharma, J.1. By filing Instant criminal -revision the petitioner has challenged the judgment dated 27.6.2007 passed by Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track No. 1 (for short 'the revisional court') whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioners has been allowed and the order dated 5.9.2005 passed by Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class Rajakheda (for short 'the trial Court'), has been set-aside.2. Brief facts of the case are that on 21.12.2002 petitioner complainant filed a complaint in the trial Court against the accused respondents for the offence under Sections 167, 182, 418, 420, 466, 469, 471, 477, 120B IPC and 3(2) SC/ST Act and 340 of the Rajasthan Police Regulation.3. The aforesaid complaint was dismissed in default, as such the complaint filed a second complaint in the trial Court with the same averments.4. The trial Court recorded the statement of the complainant under Section 200 Cr.P.C. and witnesses under Sections 202 Cr.P.C. and complainant produced...
Akhilesh Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-20-2009
Reported in: 2009CriLJ2205; RLW2009(1)Raj746
Narendra Kumar Jain, J.1. The aforesaid three cases i.e. two criminal appeals and one criminal revision petition, are directed against the common order dated 19th February, 2005 passed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No. 1, Jaipur District, Jaipur, in Sessions Case No. 13/2002, therefore, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. Under the impugned order, the learned trial court, while acquitting the accused-persons, namely Sanjay, Smt. Shakuntla, Miss Sunita and Smt. Urmila from the charges under Section 302/120-B IPC and in alternative under Sections 304-B, 498-A, 201/120-B, IPC, convicted and sentenced the accused Akhilesh as under:S. Accused Under Sentence of ImprisonmentNo. Section1. Akhilesh S/o 302, IPC To undergo life Imprisonment andDwarka Prasad a fine of Rs. 500/-498A, IPC To undergo two years RI and a fineof Rs. 100/-201, IPC To undergo five years RI and a fine of Rs. 100/-In default of payment of total fine of Rs. 700...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »