Rajasthan Court November 2008 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jahoor Ahmed Vs. Shri Lal Chand Sethi and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-07-2008
Reported in: RLW2009(2)Raj941
G.S. Sarraf, J.1. This criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for recalling the order dated 9.5.2008 passed by this Court in the absence of the Counsel fortfie petitioner.2. Briefly stated the facts are that by order dated 4.6.2004 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramganj Mandi, district Kota cognizance was taken against the petitioner of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner filed a revision against the above order which was dismissed by order dated T. 10.2005 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ramganj Mandi, district Kota in Criminal Revision No. 12/2005. Aggrieved, the petitioner filed a misc. petition before the High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. This Court on 9.5.2008 passed following order:None is present for the petitionerMr. Arun Sharma, P.P.None is present on behalf of the petitioner even in the second round. None was present on his behalf on the last date also.After hearing the...
Major General A.K. Lal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-07-2008
Reported in: RLW2009(2)Raj1039
K.S. Rathore, J.1. The petitioner has preferred the instant writ petition for seeking Writ, order or direction praying the following reliefs:(i) to quash the impugned order dated 19.6.2008 and restrain the respondents from conducting General Court Martial of the petitioner;(ii) to quash the entire proceedings initiated against the petitioner on the basis of the charge sheet dated 23/26.5.2008 (Annexure-P/12);(iii) to hold the entire action taken on the basis of the order dated 19.6.2008 and charge sheet dated 26.5.2008 as contrary and illegal to the order dated 17.3.2008 passed by the Hon'ble High Court at Delhi (Annexure P/13); (iv) any other order or direction which the Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.2. The petitioner was working as General Officer Commanding of 3 Infantry Division. On the instructions from Headquarter Northern Command, the petitioner started promoting meditation ...
Pramod Kumar Pathak Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-07-2008
Reported in: 2009CriLJ1397; 2009(1)WLN133
ORDERH.R. Panwar, J.1. By the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks quashing of the order Annex. 3 and Annex. 4 dated 26-7-2008 and 7-8-2008 respectively as also seeks quashing of FIR No. 27/2004 (Annex. 1) registered by Anti Corruption Department under the provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.2. I have heard learned Counsel for the petitioner at length. Carefully gone through the orders impugned as also the FIR.3. It appears that an FIR came to be registered vide Annex. 1 on 9-2-2004 by the Additional Superintendent of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau, Udaipur for the offences under Sections 13(1)(d), 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and under Sections 120B, 420, 467 and 471, I.P.C. After thorough investigation, the police filed challan against the petitioner for the offences under Sections 13(1)(d), 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 477A and 120B, I.P.C. ...
Yogendra @ Jogendra Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-06-2008
Reported in: RLW2009(1)Raj927
Mahesh Chandra Sharma, J.1. This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000 read with Section 397/401 Cr. P.C. against the order dated 13.10.2008 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge No. 2, Bharatpur in Cr. Appeal No. 71/2008 by which the appeal filed by the petitioner has been. dismissed and the order dated 22.9.2008 passed by the Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Bharatpur has been confirmed.2. Brief facts of the case are that complainant Gopal Jatav submitted a written report at Reserve Centre, Nadhai on 28.8.2008 to this effect that in the night of 27.7.2008 at 8-8.30 PM.his sister Meena aged 15 years went to meet with the general course of nature in the field. There the accused person with bad intention caught her and forcefully committed rape. After hearing noise of his sister, Umrao and Jal Singh reached there. Jogendra was caught red-handed. Thereafter, they brought injured to t...
Babu Lal Bairwa Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-06-2008
Reported in: RLW2009(3)Raj2143
Mohammad Rafiq, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer that the respondents be directed to consider his candidature for appointment in Rajasthan Co-operative Subordinate Services (Co-operative Inspector Gr. II) as per his placement in the order of merit prepared pursuant to the advertisement 15.5.99. According to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, though the petitioner bad given preference for appointment in the Rajasthan Co-operative Service but eventually he was not appointed because of his merit position. Subsequently, the petitioner came to know that candidates lower in merit than him, were given appointment in the Rajasthan Co-operative Subordinate Services (Co-operative Inspector Gr.II) ignoring the petitioner for such appointment, therefore, he filed writ petition with the prayer that action of the respondents be declared illegal and the respondents be directed to recommend his case for appointment i...
Naresh Chand Mathur Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-06-2008
Reported in: RLW2009(2)Raj1795; 2009(3)SLJ151(Raj)
H.R. Panwar, J.1. By the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks quashing of the order Annex.1 and Annex.2 dated 24.07.2002 and 02.04.2003 respectively.2. The facts and circumstances giving rise to the instant writ petition are that an inquiry was conducted against the petitioner under Rule 17 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 (for short 'the CCA Rules' hereinafter). He was served with a memorandum of allegation. The inquiry officer found the charges proved against the petitioner and by order Annex.1 dated 24.07.2002 imposed the penalty of withholding of two annual grade increments without cumulative effect. The order imposing penalty Annex. 1 came to be challenged by the petitioner by way of an appeal. The appeal filed by the petitioner came to be dismissed by order Annex.2 dated 02.04.2003. Hence this writ petition.3. A reply to the writ petition has been filed by the respondents contend...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›