Rajasthan Court November 2008 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dharmi Lal Dama Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-18-2008
Reported in: RLW2009(1)Raj896; 2009(1)WLN152
Govind Mathur, J.1. The Board of Management of the' Rajasthan Janjati Kshetriya Vikas Sahakari Sangh Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the Sangh') in its meeting dated 11.1.1993 resolved as follows:foLr`r fopkj foeZ'k djkus ds i'pkr~ ;g izLrko loZ lEefr ls ikfjr fd;k x;k jkT; Lrj fofHkUu lgdkjh laLFkkvks ds fy, lsok fu;e Lohd`r gksus rd jkT; la?k deZpkjh;ks ij jkT; lsok fu;e ykxw j[ks tkus ds fu.kZ; dk vuqeksnu fd;k tkrk gS ,oa jkT;la?k ds deZpkjh;ks ds fo:) vuq'kklfud dk;Zokgh ds fy, jktLFkku vlSfud lsok,Wa] oxhZdj.k] fu;a=.k ,ao vihy fu;e] 1958 ds rgr xr o'kksZ esa dh xbZ dk;Zokgh dh iqf'V ,oa Hkfo'; ds fy, mDr fu;eks dks ykxw j[kus dk vuqeksnu fd;k tkrk gSA(Hereinafter referred to as 'the resolution No.38'.)2. The resolution aforesaid is still in currency and no service rules are yet approved to regulate service conditions of the employees of the Sangh that is a cooperative society registered under the Rajasthan Cooperative Societies Act, 1965 (now deemed to be registered under the ...
Deepak Kumar Pandey Vs. Jaswant Singh and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-17-2008
Reported in: RLW2009(2)Raj1088
Narendra Kumar Jain, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. Admit. The contesting respondents are represented by their counsel. With the consent of the learned Counsel for both the parties, the appeal was heard finally and is being disposed of.3. The claimant-appellant has preferred this appeal for enhancement of amount of compensation in respect of death of their unmarried daughter namely, Anurakti Pandey aged about 17 years who died in motor accident took place on 11.6.2003 and being aggrieved with the impugned award dated 2.5.2005 passed by the Addl. District Judge (Fast Track) No. 8, Jaipur City, Jaipur, whereby the learned Tribunal awarded total compensation of Rs. 2,37,000/- in their favour.4. The only submission of the learned Counsel for the appellant is that the learned Tribunal committed an illegality in not assessing the income of the deceased as Rs. 4,000/- per month as stated by the appellant in his statement and in awarding the lump sum amount of Rs. 2,25,000/- onl...
Commercial Taxes Officer Vs. Solicit Cosmetics and Fragrance Cosmetics ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-17-2008
Reported in: (2009)24VST321(Raj)
Vineet Kothari, J.1. The following common question of law arises in the present four revision petitions filed by the Revenue:Whether the assessing authority was justified in imposing additional sales tax on the basis of assessable value of the commodity 'hair oil' sold by the assessee-manufacturer to the distributor M/s. Bajaj Sevashram Limited computed as per Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 irrespective of actual sale consideration charged by the assessee for sale of the said commodity?2. The appellate authorities below held in favour of the assessee that the assessing authority could not impose such additional tax on the assessee and unless sale consideration was shown to have been charged by the assessee from its purchaser under an agreement, no such additional tax could be imposed upon the respondent-assessee. Upholding the contention of the assessee that imposition of Central excise duty on the basis of assessable value computed as per Section 4 of the Central Excise Act...
Mahashakti Peeth Religious Endowment Trust Vs. Shelendra Pratap Singh
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-17-2008
Reported in: RLW2009(3)Raj2490
Dalip Singh, J.1. This misc. appeal under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 24.2.2006 passed by the learned District Judge, Jaipur City, Jaipur in Civil Misc. Application No. 65/1995 by which he has allowed the application filed under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act filed by the respondent Shelendra Pratap Singh allowing the letters of administration in favour of the respondent.2. The facts, in brief, are that an application under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act came to be filed by the respondent for the grant of letters of administration based upon the alleged Will executed by the deceased Shradha Mata @ Parwati Devi daughter of Shri Shamsher Singh who died on 29.7.1994 at Jaipur within the jurisdiction of the Court at Jaipur leaving behind the properties as mentioned in the Schedule appended to the said application. The applicant-respondent herein also alleged that the deceased Shradha Mata had dur...
Jct Ltd. Vs. Commercial Taxes Officer
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-14-2008
Reported in: (2009)11VatReporter81
Vineet Kothari, J.1. Heard learned Counsels.2. These revision petitions of the assessee are directed against the order of the Tax Board dated 9.8.2007, whereby, Tax Board upheld the order of Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) dated 28.6.2006 holding that the general notfn No. F.4(12)FDGr.lV/89-50 dated 13.9.1989 published on 16.9.1989 S.O. No. 97 for partial exemption would not apply to the petitioner assessee in the face of subsequent notfn No. F4(30)FD/tax Div/ 2002-147 dated 22.3.2002 [S. No. 1536] applicable to cotton being special notfn and, therefore, since the excess tax, if any, paid on the purchase of cotton over 1 1/2% was not required to be refunded vide condition No. 4 of the said notfn dated 22.3.2002, therefore, assessee could not claim any refund of excess tax paid over one and a half percent on purchase of cotton by him during the period after 22.3.2002.3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner assessee submitted that the previous general notfn dated 13.9.1989 was not specifical...
State of Rajasthan Vs. Nasir
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-14-2008
Reported in: RLW2009(2)Raj1747
Mahesh Bhagwati, J.1. Challenged this appeal is to the judgment dated 11th March, 1997 rendered by Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Kota (Special Judge, NDPS Act, Cases) whereby the accused respondent Nasir was hot found guilty and acquitted in the offence under Section 8/21 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act, 1985').2. The prosecution story is woven like this: That on 25th April, 1995 PW/2 Shri Kesari Chand, SHO Police Station Kaithuni Pole got an information that the accused Nasir was selling smack on Radhavilas Road. Shri Kesari Chand, having got this information, accompanied by the Police Officers, reached Radhavilas Road near 'Jharne Ke Balaji' and found a person of identical features standing there, who having seen the police, endeavoured to flee. However, the Police nabbed him and asked about his identity whereupon he identified himself to be Nasir. Shri Kesari Chand after observing the legal formalities, took the search ...
State of Rajasthan Vs. Ramswaroop
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-14-2008
Reported in: RLW2009(2)Raj1805
Mahesh Bhagwati, J.1. The challenge in this appeal is to the judgment dated 23 September, 1997 whereby, the learned District & Sessions Judge, Baran acquitted the accused-respondent Ramswaroop in the offences under Sections 376 and 323 of IPC.2. The nub of the appellant's story is:That on 17.11.1996 at 5:20 pm the prosecutrix aged 26 years accompanied with her daughter aged 3 and a half years went near Talal for grazing goats. When she was standing near the goats, the accused-respondent came there and asked her as to where that person who used to graze the goats had gone. She told that he had gone to Bohat. Then the accused-respondent suddenly came and forcibly dragged her to the Mustard field where he made her to lie on the ground. It is further alleged that he pulled her cloths, torn her blouse, squeezed her breasts and forcibly ravished her for about half an hour. He left her only after fulfilling his wild lust. When he was to flee she assaulted on her legs with a wooden stick. The ...
Som Pratap Gupta (Dr.) Vs. Mahesh Dutt and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-12-2008
Reported in: RLW2009(2)Raj1116
Narendra Kumar Jain, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. The injured-appellant has preferred this appeal Under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, for enhancement of the amount of compensation and being aggrieved with the impugned award dated 3.8.96 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kotputali, whereby the learned Tribunal rias awarded total compensation of Rs. 96,000/- In his favour as under:Rs. 5,000/- for medical expenses,'Rs. 6,000/- for one and half month leave during which he remained under treatment,Rs. 441/- for transportation charges,Rs. 40,000/- for mental agony,Rs. 44,400/- for 44.4% permanent disability3. The only submission of the learned Counsel for the appellant is that the learned Tribunal committed an illegality in not awarded adequate compensation in respect of 44.4% permanent disability suffered by the appellant. He contended that at the relevant time in the year 1989, the salary of the appellant was Rs. 4,000/- and he was 36 years of ag...
Ajai Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-12-2008
Reported in: 2009CriLJ1075
Guman Singh, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the accused appellant Ajai Singh against the judgment of learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No. 5, Bharatpur, dated June 28, 2004, passed in Sessions Case No. 2/2004, whereby he was convicted and sentenced for the offence under Section 366 IPC for five years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for two months and for the offence under Section 376 IPC, ten years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1,000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for two months.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution story is that Bachhu Singh, father of the prosecutrix lodged a written report with the police station, Mathura Gate, Bharatpur, on 9-4-2003, to the effect that his daughter, student of class VIII of Meena Devi Adarsh Vidhayalaya, Suraj Mai Nagar, Bharatpur, had gone to school in the morning but did not return even after th...
Kishore Bhagtani Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-12-2008
Reported in: 2009CriLJ1172
ORDERMahesh Chandra Sharma, J.1. These two revision petitions arise from the common order dated July 23, 2008 of the Special Judge (Printing and Stationary Embezzlement cases) and CB1 Cases, Jaipur framing charges against the petitioners Kishore Bhagtani and Dharmendra Kumar Singhal under Section 120B IPC read with Sections 7(13)(2) and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, they are being disposed by this common order.2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioners Kishore Bhagtani and Dharmendra Kumar Singhal and other co-accused are employees of BSNL. A committee comprising of Santosh Kumar Meena, Deputy General Manager (Administration), Kishore Bhagtani Area Manager (Central), D.K. Singhal DGM (Finance) and O.P. Garg, JTO (General Administration Wing) was constituted vide order dated March 4,2005 with the approval of the Principal General Manager Telecom District Jaipur. This Committee was to submit recommendations for private hospitals for their empanelement in BS...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »