Rajasthan Court May 2007 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ram NaraIn Vs. Goverdhan Singh and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-02-2007
Reported in: AIR2007Raj217; RLW2007(4)Raj2779
ORDERN.P. Gupta, J.1. The petitioner in this petition is a returned candidate, whose election has been set aside by the impugned order Ex. 9, D/-27-1-2007.2. The case of the petitioner, as pleaded in the writ petition is, that for the election of Sarpanch and Panch of the Gram Panchayat, Palana, election programme was declared, and according to programme, 3-2-2005 was fixed for filing nomination form, scrutiny, and time for withdrawal of the nomination paper, and election was to be held on 4-2-2005. According to the petitioner, in all 10 nomination papers were filed for the office of Sarpanch, and out of them only 9 were found to be valid, and a list thereof was published on the notice board, and four of them presented withdrawal, which included the respondent No. 1, hereafter referred to as the 'election-petitioner'. The elections took place between five persons only, and the petitioner was duly elected. It is alleged, that election-petitioner filed an election petition, on the ground...
Ganga Sahay Vs. Ravikant Arya and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-02-2007
Reported in: RLW2007(4)Raj3281
Narendra Kumar Jain, J.1. Petitioner Ganga Sahay has preferred this contempt petition for disobedience of the order dated 30.11.2005 of this Court passed in S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 557/2005, whereby the tenant-respondent was granted time to vacate the rented premise till 31st May, 2006.2. Admittedly, in spite of order of this Court and written- undertaking furnished by the tenant-respondent, the premise was not vacated and the possession of the rented premise was delivered through Execution Court on 21 st December, 2006, during the pendency of this contempt petition. Now, there is no dispute in between both the parties that possession of the premise has been delivered to the petitioner on 21st December, 2006.3. The only contention raised on behalf of the petitioner is that he could not get possession of the premise for about six months and 21 days, in spite of written-under-taking furnished by tenant-respondent, therefore,, the tenant-respondent definitely disobeyed the order of t...
Amar Chand Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-02-2007
Reported in: RLW2008(1)Raj321
Narendra Kumar Jain, J.1. Accused-appellant Amar Chand S/o Prakash Chand has challenged the impugned judgment and order dated 2nd July, 2003, passed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track) Ajmer, in Sessions Case No. 96/02 (19/01) whereby he was convicted and sentenced under Section 376, IPC, to undergo 7 years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand); in default of payment of fine, to further undergo additional six months simple imprisonment.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that on 23rd October, 2000, PW-1 Kumari Sunita (the prosecutrix) submitted a typed-report (Exhibit- P-1) before the Superintendent of Police, Ajmer, wherein it was mentioned that on 20th February i.e. about 7-8 months ago, Amar Chand called her to cook food at his house, where he committed forcible sexual intercourse with her and she conceived. When accused-persons came to know about her pregnancy then they tried for her miscarriage. The accused and his fami...
Usha Devi Vs. State and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-02-2007
Reported in: 2007(3)WLN383
Govind Mathur, J.1. A direction is sought by the petitioner for respondents to accord her appointment as Teacher Grade-II from the date it was given to the persons who stood at lower pedestal in the select list prepared by the respondents in order of merit.2. In brief, facts of the case are that the petitioner after obtaining Bachelors Degree in Arts from Oudh University in the year 1983, qualified the Bachelors Degree in Education in the year 1987 and also obtained Master Degree in Arts with Hindi in the year 1990 both from the Rajasthan University. The petitioner faced selection proceedings conducted by the respondents under a notification No. 5/93 for the purpose of recruitment to the post of Teacher Grade III, under the Rajasthan Panchayat Samities and Zila Parishads Service Rules, 1959 and a select list as a consequent thereto was declared in the month of September 1993, however, name of the petitioner was not in that though certain persons standing at lower pedestal in merit than...
Sukhvinder Singh Vs. Addl. District Magistrate (Vigilance) and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-02-2007
Reported in: 2007(3)WLN531
Gopal Krishan Vyas, J.1. In this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction for quashing impugned order dt. 05.02.1997 (Annex.-6) and respondents may be directed to record the land situated at Chak 52F, Muraba No. 16, comprising of kila 1 to 5 in the name of the petitioner and entries for Samvat Year 2051 to 2054, standing in the name of the Gurudwara, may be recorded in his name.2. According to facts narrated inter alia in the petition, the petitioner's grand father late Kesar Singh was granthi of Gurudwara Chak 52F, Srikaranpur and being granthi of the Gurudwara he was village servant and allotment of the said land measuring 5 bigha was made in his favour on 07.08.1967 under the Rajasthan Colonisation (Gang Canal Permanent Allotment) Rules, 1957 (in short, 'the Rules of 1957' hereinafter) at the rate of Rs. 400/- per bigha. It is averred in the writ petition that entire price of the land has been paid off and the petitioner is in cultivatory possession of the said land.3. It ...
Gulab Chand and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-02-2007
Reported in: 2007(3)WLN127
R.M. Lodha, J.1. The three villagers residing in Village Maujpur, Tehsil Mahua, District Dausa have filed this writ petition in the nature of Public Interest Litigation. According to them the interest of general public of Village Maujpur has been seriously affected by the allotment of two hectares of land to the Indian Oil Corporation out of 'Charagah land' bearing Khasra No. 222 ad-measuring 6.13 hectares situate at Village Maujpur.2. Section 5(28) of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (for short, 'Act of 1955') defines 'pasture land' to mean land used for the grazing of the cattle of a village or villages or recorded in settlement records as such at the commencement of that Act or thereafter reserved as such in accordance with the rules framed by the State Government.3. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 257 of the Act of 1955, the State Government made the Rules called Rajasthan Tenancy (Government) Rules, 1955 (for short, 'Rules of 1955'). Chapter II thereof is to give eff...
Maya Gupta (Smt.) Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-02-2007
Reported in: 2007(2)WLN235
H.R. Panwar, J.1. By the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks quashing of order Annex.4 dt. 30.10.2001 and a direction to release payment of maternity leave availed by the petitioner as applicable to the other government employees under Rule 103 of the Rajasthan Services Rules.2. I have heard learned Counsel for the parties.3. The facts and circumstances giving rise to the instant writ petition are that the petitioner was engaged on a consolidated salary of Rs. 4500/-per month on urgent temporary basis on the post of Nurse Gr.II for a period of six months vide order Annex.1 dt. 31.01.2000 on a sanction granted by the Government of Rajasthan. The said sanction was granted by the Government of Rajasthan after getting approval from the Department of Finance and on the basis of the order issued by the Director of Medical and Health Services, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur, the Joint Director, Medical and Health Services vide Order Anne...
Bhanwari Devi Rawal (Smt.) Vs. State and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-02-2007
Reported in: 2007(3)WLN497
Govind Mathur, J.1. By this petition for writ, a direction is sought by the petitioner to regularize him in service as Class-IV employee with respondents.2. In brief, the factual matrix of the case is that the petitioner was employed as a Cook at Government Hostel, Social Welfare Department, Osian on 03.09.1991. The respondents regularized the services of number of persons in Class IV cadre including the persons who were employed subsequent to the petitioner, thus, the petitioner submitted a representation to the competent authority and that came to be rejected by the Additional Director (Administration), Social Welfare Department, Jaipur on the count that the Screening Committee met on 21.02.2003 to consider cases of Part Time Cooks/ Chaukidars, on examination of record, found that the petitioner was not working on 01.05.1995 i.e. the cut off date for regularization and, therefore, it was not possible to regularize her in service. Being aggrieved by the same, this petition for writ is...
Sushila Agrawal (Smt.) Vs. Ramesh Chandra Agrawal
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-01-2007
Reported in: AIR2007Raj196; RLW2007(3)Raj2174
Guman Singh, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 29.7.1999, passed by Judge, Family Court, Kota, in Civil Suit No. 138/1994 whereby the petition of the respondent under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act') was allowed and a decree of dissolution of marriage was passed.2. Briefly stated the facts essential for the disposal of this appeal are that 9.5.1994 the respondent-husband (for short the 'husband') filed a petition before the Family Court, Kota, wherein it was averred that he was married with the appellant-wife (for short the 'wife') on 27.5.1990 as per the Hindu rites. Prior to it, the respondent was married to Smt. Bhagwati Kumari, who died on 19.3.1989, leaving behind three children namely Sangeeta (born on 3.1.1970), Sonam (born on 2.4.1993) and Abhishek. The husband was working as Assistant Manager in J.K. Synthetics Ltd., Kota. Therefore, he decided to marry again specially in the interest of three children who needed...
Kamla Vs. State of Rajasthan Through P.P.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-01-2007
Reported in: II(2008)DMC159; RLW2007(3)Raj2557
Narendra Kumar Jain, J.1. The Additional District & Sessions Judge No. 1 (Fast Track) Kota, vide impugned judgment and order dated 30th January, 2002, in Sessions Case No. 842001, convicted and sentenced the accused-appellant under Section 304B, IPC, to undergo 7 years rigorous imprisonment.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that initially PW-1 Amar Dhwaj Singh, father of deceased Usha, lodged a written report on 7.8.2000 at 9.50 AM at Police Station Udyog Nagar, Kota, wherein it was written that about one-and-half year ago he got his daughter Usha married with Raj Bahadur Singh. His daughter died in a suspicious circumstance at her matrimonial house. She is hanged on fan in her room. The S.H.O. registered the report under Section 176, Cr.P.C. and forwarded it to the Additional District Magistrate for enquiry. The postmortem of deceased Usha was conducted on the same day wherein it was opined that her death has been due to asphyxia as a result of antemortem hanging.3. Subseque...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »