Rajasthan Court April 2007 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Munna (Smt.) Vs. Tara Chand
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-02-2007
Reported in: RLW2008(1)Raj569
Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. Instant appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 27th April, 1991, passed by Judge, Family Court, Jaipur, whereby the petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act'), filed by the husband was decreed for divorce.2. The marriage between the appellant and respondent was solemnized on April 21, 1976 according to Hindu Rites and out of that wedlock a daughter was born to them.3. In the petition, it was alleged by the respondent-husband that the appellant started quarreling with him and she usually left the house and most of the time she stayed with her father. It was further alleged that the appellant wife had illicit relations with one lady Sheela Saxena. She always treated the respondent with cruelty and finally deserted him on 2.11.1986.4. The appellant filed reply and denied all the allegations levelled against her by the respondent. She admitted that the allegation regarding illicit relations with Smt. Sheela Saxe...
Manju (Smt.) Vs. Ramavtar
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-02-2007
Reported in: RLW2008(1)Raj565
Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. D.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 627/2003 is directed against the order dated 18.1.2003 passed by Judge, Family Court No. 2, Jaipur, in case No. 39/2002 whereby an application of the appellant filed under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Civil Procedure Code was rejected.2. Another Appeal No. 628/2003 has been directed against the order dated 18.1.2003, passed by Judge, Family Court No. 2, Jaipur, in Execution Case No. 5/2001 directing the appellant (wife) to hand-over the custody of the child to the respondent (husband) in execution of decree dated 26.7.1999.3. While taking up the appeal no. 627/2003, it is revealed that the appellant wife had filed an application under Order 9 Rule 13 C.P.C. for setting aside the exparte judgment and decree dated 26.7.1999 passed against her alleging therein that she is an illiterate lady and could not understand the proceedings of the Court and no process was served upon her and the matter was proceeded exparte. She further stated that she ...
Narendra Mohan Mathur Vs. Smt. Chandrakanta
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-02-2007
Reported in: I(2008)DMC349; RLW2008(1)Raj570
Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. Instant appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 19.8.2002, passed by Judge, Family Court No. 1, Jaipur, whereby the petition filed by the appellant husband under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage, Act for seeking divorce on the ground of cruelty was dismissed.2. The marriage between the appellant and the respondent took place on 13.2.1986 in Jaipur City as per the Hindu Rites.3. In the petition before the Judge, Family Court, No. 1, Jaipur, it was alleged by the appellant-husband that the respondent-wife was a lady of quarrelsome nature and she started behaving in a cruel manner with the family members of the appellant from very beginning. She left the house of the appellant along, with her child without any information and she always insisted her husband to live in a separate house from her parents to which the appellant was not agreeable. Finally she deserted the appellant-husband in February 1998. It was under the aforesaid extreme circumstanc...
Shri NaraIn and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-02-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)WLN161
1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dt. 29.11.2006 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby the writ petition of the appellants challenging the judgment of the Assistant Collector, Jaipur dt. 10.04.1992 and the Board of Revenue dt. 20.01.1997 was dismissed.2. We have heard Shri K.K. Mehrishi, learned Senior Advocate for the appellants and Shri Bharat Vyas, learned Additional Advocate General for the respondents.3. Factual matrix of the case is that the predecessors-in-title of the appellants filed a declaratory suit alongwith an application seeking temporary injunction in the Court of Assistant Collector, Chaksu, Camp Court Sanganer on 29.12.1989 against respondent State of Rajasthan and respondent No. 4 Nathu. The Assistant Collector however by his order dt. 24.09.1991 dismissed the suit as well as the application for temporary injunction. Aggrieved therefrom, they filed an appeal before the Revenue Appellate Authority, Jaipur. The Revenue Appellate Authority by its judg...
Kanhaiya Lal Sharma Vs. Smt. Narendra Kanwar and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-02-2007
Reported in: 2007(2)WLN366
Vineet Kothari, J.1. This appeal Under Section 96 of CPC is directed against the judgment and decree dt. 02.03.2007 passed by the learned ADJ No. 4, Jaipur City, Jaipur dismissing the suit filed by the plaintiff Kanhaiya Lal Sharma as barred by principles of res-judicata.2. The litigative history of this long drawn battle, in brief is like this. The plaintiff Kanhaiya Lal in the plaint of the present suit filed for declaration and permanent injunction stated that he was working as cook with late Rao Bhagwat Singh Ji and also did Seva Pooja in his temple and being happy with his service, the said Rao Bhagwat Singh gave a gift of suit property comprising of two rooms on the ground floor and one at first floor constructed thereon and open land near Ghodon Ki Dhani in Jaipur. The said Rao Bhagwat Singh expired on 25.11.1967 and he left behind three wives Smt. Ghanshyam Kanwar, Smt. Sajjan Kanwar and Smt. Subh Deveshwari who filed a partition suit which was decreed upon compromise on 31.05....
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›