Rajasthan Court January 2007 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Phulle Khan and ors. Vs. Balu Khan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-02-2007
Reported in: 2007(1)WLN238
Prakash Tatia, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the appellants2. The plaintiffs/respondents No. 1 and 2 filed a suit for declaration, possession and injunction against the defendants (appellants and the respondents No. 3 to 6) alleging that the plaintiffs are the owners of the property in dispute and the defendants illegally encroached upon the property in dispute.3. The defendants claimed that the property in dispute was originally belonging to one Phuse Khan who had three sons. Two of them are the plaintiffs and one was Heer Singh. Heer Singh sold the property to Kayamkhani Samaj through the appellants on 14.01.1957. The defendants also took the objection that the suit is barred by time.4. The trial Court gave permission to the plaintiffs to maintain the suit by giving permission under Order 1 Rule 8 CPC as the defendants claimed the property was of Kayamkhani Samaj. The trial Court after recording evidence, declared the plaintiffs as owners of the property in question and passed the d...
Jameel Ahmed Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-01-2007
Reported in: 2007CriLJ2009
ORDER1. The petitioner has challenged an order dated 24-9-2000 whereby the State Government has withdrawn its earlier letter dated 28-10-1998 wherein the State had given the benefit of parole, Open Camp Jail and Remission to the prisoners convicted under NDPS Act and TADA Act.2. The brief facts of the case are that vide judgment dated 30-11-2002, the Judge, Designated Court, TADA, Ajmer had convicted the appellant under Section 6(1) of TADA under Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act and under Section 9-B(1) B and (vii) and under Section 9-C of the Explosive Act and had sentenced him for different terms of imprisonment, the maximum being 5 years of R.I. Till 16-7-2006, the petitioner has undergone an incarceration of 4 years and 23 days. According to the petitioner vide letter dated 28-10-1998, the benefit of remission, parole & Open Camp Jail was extended to prisoners convicted under NDPS Act and TADA Act. However, vide order dated 29-4-2000, the said letter was revoked. Hence the...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›