Rajasthan Court September 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jayant Kumar Pandiya Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Sep-01-2006
Reported in: RLW2006(4)Raj3437
H.R. Panwar, J.1. This criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is directed against the order dated 1.7.2006 passed by Sessions Judge, Dungarpur (for short 'the revisional court' hereinafter) whereby the revision petition Tiled by the petitioner against the order dated 17.2.2005 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dungarpur (for short 'the trial court' hereinafter) was dismissed.2. The brief facts of the case to the extent they are relevant and necessary for the decision of the instant criminal misc. petition are that on 29.3.1999, the Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Bichhiwara lodged a report against Block Development Officer Jayant Kumar Pandiya, Junior Accountant Govind Ram Verma and Fitter Jahoor Ahmed alleging therein that they have misused and embezzled the Govt. money in the matter of purchase of tools for hand-pumps. After investigation, the police filed challan for the offences under Sections 467, 468, 471 and 120B I.P.C. Along with the challan, the Addit...
Paramjeet Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Sep-01-2006
Reported in: 2007CriLJ591
ORDERH.R. Panwar, J.1. By the instant criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, 'the Code' hereinafter), the petitioner seeks direction to run the substantive sentences concurrently awarded to him in Criminal Cases Nos. 480/2002, 565/2002 and 604/2003 vide Judgment and order dated 20-8-2004 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangaria, district Hanumangarh (for short, 'the trial Court' hereinafter), whereby the trial Court, on the plea of guilt, convicted the accused-petitioner for the offence under Section 379, IPC in all the three cases and sentenced him to undergo two years simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine further to undergo one month's simple imprisonment.2. A notice for final hearing is accepted by the learned Public Prosecutor. With the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, the criminal miscellaneous petition is being heard and decided at the admission s...
Ramsharan Gupta Huf Vs. Shree Datta Stone Crushers Pvt. Ltd. and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Sep-01-2006
Reported in: RLW2007(1)Raj756; [2007]76SCL370(Raj)
Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayer:(a) The respondent company M/s. Shree Datta Stone Crusher Pvt. Ltd. Jaipur be directed to be wound up under the direction of this Hon'ble Court under the provisions of Companies Act (1 of 1956) and the official liquidator, attached to the Rajasthan High Court Jaipur be appointed Liquidator of the respondent company to take charge of all the assets, properties and records of the respondent company with all powers under Section 457 of the Companies Act (I of 1956) to be exercised under Section 458 of the said Act without the section and intervention of this Hon'ble Court save and except in the case of sale of the immovable properties of the respondent company.(b) the respondent company be directed to pay to the petitioner the costs of the petition.2. Upon failure to repay the loan and interest, provided by petitioner to respondent company, the petitioner gave a statutory notice to the respondent co...
Smt. Mridula Gupta Vs. Shree Datta Stone Crushers P. Ltd. and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Sep-01-2006
Reported in: [2007]135CompCas507(Raj); [2007]75SCL453(Raj)
Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayer:(a) The respondent-company M/s. Shree Datta Stone Crusher Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur, be directed to be wound up under the direction of this hon'ble court under the provisions of the Companies Act (1 of 1956) and the official liquidator, attached to the Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur, be appointed liquidator of the respondent-company to take charge of all the assets, properties and records of the respondent-company with all powers under Section 457 of the Companies Act (1 of 1956) to be exercised under Section 458 of the said Act without the section and intervention of this hon'ble court save and except in the case of sale of the immovable properties of the respondent-company.(b) the respondent-company be directed to pay to the petitioner the costs of the petition.2. Upon failure to repay the loan and interest, provided by the petitioner to respondent-company, the petitioner gave a statutory notice to the r...
Mohan Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Sep-01-2006
Reported in: 2007(1)SLJ375(Raj)
ORDERMohammad Rafiq, J.1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition with the prayer that the respondents may be directed to consider his case for promotion to the post of Assistant Director Agriculture from the date persons junior to him were promoted and may be further directed to make fixation of his pay in the pay scale pertaining to the post of Agriculture Officer w.e.f. 31.3.1991 and pay him all actual benefits accrued therefrom. He has also prayed that the action of the respondents in making notional fixation without actual benefits may be declared illegal.2. The facts giving rise to the present petition are that after being selected by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer the petitioner was appointed as Agriculture Extension Officer by the respondents vide order dated 22.7.1971. The respondent No. 1 passed an order on 30.3.1991 promoting various other officers on the post of Agriculture Officer against the vacancies of the year 1990-91. However it was stated in the o...
Ladu Ram Meena Vs. Gordhan Lal and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Sep-01-2006
Reported in: IV(2006)ACC450
ORDERPrem Shanker Asopa, J.1. The instant appeal has been filed for enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and Special Judge (E.C. Act cases), Jaipur vide its Award dated 12.4.2006 in Claim Case No. 1018/2004 (1954/2001) whereby the claim petition filed by the claimant has been allowed and compensation amounting to Rs. 1,39,000 has been awarded in his favour.2. Brief facts of the case are that on 9.2.2001 while the claimant along with Lakshmi Narain was going on a motor cycle No. RJ-14 9M-220 from Basis towards Jaipur, at about 11-11.30 a.m. when they reached just ahead RIICO Industrial Area, Bassi, near Benar turn, car bearing No. DAC 6403 hit the motor cycle as a result whereof both the persons sustained injuries.3. The claimant-appellant filed claim petition before the Tribunal claiming compensation amounting to Rs. 11,51,000. The Tribunal after hearing the parties, awarded compensation amounting to Rs. 1,39,000.4. In the claim petition,...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›