Rajasthan Court August 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
inder Singh and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-02-2006
Reported in: RLW2006(4)Raj3289
Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. Inder Singh and Pop Singh, appellants herein, along with co-accused Prahlad Singh, Sanwat Singh and Mahendra Singh, were put to trial before the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No. 2 Sikar Camp Neemka Thana, who vide judgment dated February 20, 2003, while acquitting coaccused, convicted and sentenced the appellants as under:Under Section 302/34 IPC:Each to suffer imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 1000/-, in default to further suffer imprisonment for six months.Under Section 323/34 IPC:Each to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year.The substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently.2. The prosecution story is woven like thus:On January 15, 2000 informant Bhanwar Singh (PW. 3) submitted a written report (Ex. P. 4) at Police Station Patan stating therein that on the said day around 4 PM while he, his brother Bahadur Singh, Bhabhi Sharda and Jai Singh's wife Santra were at their house suddenly Prahlad Singh, Sanwat Singh, Mahendra Sing...
Karan Singh Through His Lrs. Vs. the Collector and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-02-2006
Reported in: RLW2006(4)Raj3132; 2006(4)WLC720
Mohammad Rafiq, J.1. In the present writ petition, the petitioner Karan Singh challenged the order of his dismissal dated 26.12.1992 (Annex. 25) with the prayer that the said order and the inquiry proceedings initiated against him may be quashed and set aside and further prayed that he may be reinstated in service with all consequential benefits. Unfortunately, the petitioner expired during pendency of writ petition on 28th November, 1999. This Court by its order dated 26th May, 2003 allowed his legal representatives to substitute him as the petitioners. In the present judgment however, reference to the petitioner wherever made should be construed as the original writ petitioner.2. The petitioner was appointed on the post of Patwari on 01st August, 1956. A departmental inquiry was initiated against the petitioner vide order dated 29th August, 1975 under Rule 14 of the Land Revenue (Land Records) Rules, 1957 (for short 'the Rules of 1957' hereinafter).3. Although from various charges in...
Mijjo Babu @ Brij Mohan Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-02-2006
Reported in: RLW2006(4)Raj3298
Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. An innocent agriculturist Kishan Singh was shot dead while he was ploughing the field. Mijjo Babu @ Brij Mohan, the appellant herein, was put to trial for having committed murder of Kishan Singh. Learned Special Judge SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Cases) and Sessions Judge Dholpur, found the appellant guilty and convicted and sentenced him vide judgment dated September 18, 2004 as under:Under/Section 302 IPC:To suffer imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 20000/- in default to further suffer imprisonment for one year.Under/Section 3/27 Arms Act:To suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years and fine of Rs. 5000/-, in default to further suffer imprisonment for three months.The substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently.2. It is the prosecution case that informant Kalicharan (PW. 2) on October 13, 1998 submitted a written report at Police Station Nihalganj Dholpur stating therein that on the said day around 2 PM he and his brother Kanhaiya had gone ...
Pushpendra Singh Vs. Samay Singh @ Tofani and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-02-2006
Reported in: I(2007)ACC793; RLW2007(1)Raj339
Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. In these appeals preferred by the claimant challenge is made to the judgment dated May 26, 2005 of learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Special Judge Dacoity Affected Area) Bharatpur (for short 'Tribunal'), whereby two claim petitions filed by the claimant were dismissed.2. Contextual facts depict that the claimant filed two separate petitions for the loss suffered by him due to the death of his wife Pinky and son Ramu in an accident alleged to have occurred on June 21, 2002 while traveling in a Tractor No. RJ05/IR-2776. The driver of the tractor drove it rashly and engligently and overturned it resulting demise of Pinky and Ramu. The respondent insurance company in its reply before the Tribunal denied the averments and pleaded that no such accident was ever occurred and the petitions were based on incorrect facts. Learned Tribunal framed as many as five issues on the basis of the pleadings of the parties. In support of claim petitions, the claimant examined ...
Mohan Lal Verma and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-02-2006
Reported in: RLW2007(2)Raj1474; 2006(4)WLC400
K.S. Rathore, J.1. This joint writ petition is filed by the petitioners who are the employees of the Rajasthan Gram Dan Board.2. The grievance of the petitioners relates to anomaly in the pay scale. The petitioners are working on the various posts such as Office Assistant and Typist etc. The petitioners to establish their right are comparing the service conditions with that of Khadi and Village Industries Board and to point out the discrepancy, a comparative chart regarding pay scale is given in Annexure-3. The petitioners in para No. 11 and 12 categorically stated that the pay scale of the employees of the Rajasthan Gram Dan Board are far less than the pay scale of the employees of the State of Rajasthan or employees of Rajasthan Khadi and Village Industries Board although the employees of the non petitioners are discharging the similar work.3. And thus, being violative of the provisions of Article 14 and discriminatory and arbitrary not to put at par the employees of the non petition...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Hukmi and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-02-2006
Reported in: IV(2006)ACC584
Dinesh Maheshwari, J.1. This appeal has been submitted by the insurer of the vehicle involved in the accident assailing the award dated 28th September, 1992 made by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Banner in Claim Case No. 28/1989 in the sum of Rs. 1,74,000 in favour of the claimant-respondents for accidental death of their son Babulal 20 years in age, essentially on the ground of limit of its liability in the sum of Rs. 1,50,000 and not beyond.2. At about 12.30 p.m. on 27.12.1988 on Dhorimana to Candhav route near village Dabli the deceased Babulal, son of the claimants, while driving a Jonga bearing registration No. RJC 3815 sustained fatal injuries on being hit head-on by a truck bearing registration No. RNM 6609 driven by non-applicant No. 1 Shankerlal. Narrating the incident, parents of the deceased Babulal submitted the present claim application with the averments that Babulal was 20 years in age earning Rs. 650 per month and contributing Rs. 550 per month to the parents and c...
Ranjeet Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-01-2006
Reported in: RLW2006(4)Raj3265
Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. Ranjeet Singh, Jagveer Singh, Laxman Singh, Girvar Singh, Goverdhan Singh and Bhanwar Lal, appellants herein, were put to trial before the learned Special Judge SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Cases) Ajmer, who vide judgment dated July 30, 1999 convicted and sentenced them as under:Under Section. 302/149 IPC:Each to suffer imprisonment for life.Under Section. 147/149 IPC:Each to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year.The substantive sentences were or - run concurrently.2. It is the prosecution case that informant Sheoji Ram (PW. 2) on June 26, 1992 submitted a written report at police station Roopangarh stating therein that on the said day his nephew Kishna Ram (since deceased) was beaten up with lathis at the field of Ranjeet Singh by the appellants. On that report a case under Sections 147 and 323 IPC was registered and investigation commenced. Kishna Ram succumbed to his injuries in the hospital on June 28, 1992 and Section 302 IPC was added. Dead body was...
Biram Lal and ors. Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-01-2006
Reported in: RLW2007(1)Raj713
Harbans Lal, J.1. This revision petition under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. is directed against the order dated 22.10.2005 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) cum Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Nasirabad District Ajmer in Criminal Case No. 685/2003 whereby he has dismissed the application filed by the petitioners and framed the charges against them for the offences under Sections 384 and 506 IPC.2. Brief facts giving rise to this revision petition are that on 16.9.2003 complainant Laxmi Narain lodged a report at Police Station Mangaliawas Distt. Ajmer alleging therein that he is a member of Prajapat community. Some persons of the community have constituted an illegal organization which is indulging in humiliating the members of the community. They have also imposed heavy fines. It is alleged that the persons named in the First Information Report including the petitioners have been torturing the complainant for last about 10 years on account of the marriage of his sister Bha...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›