Rajasthan Court May 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Surajmal Katara and ors. Vs. State and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-01-2006
Reported in: RLW2006(3)Raj2313; 2006(4)WLC159
N.P. Gupta, J.1. All these writ petitions arise in identical circumstances, and involve common question of law, therefore, they are being decided by this common judgment.2. The petitioners seek direction in these writ petitions, to be given admission in the B.S.T.C. correspondence course, in pursuance of Annexure 9 and 10, so also to be allowed to continue to pursue the course, and after successfully passing the examination they may be issued the degree of B.S.T.C. Course. It is also prayed, in the alternative, that if in future any B.S.T.C. correspondence course is conducted by any of the fresh advertisement, than the petitioners may be considered for giving them the BSTC training through correspondence, on preferential basis. The fourth prayer made is, to reinstate the petitioners in the services of Shiksha Mitra, or on any equivalent post, and after passing the B.S.T.C. course, their services may be regularised.3. At the beginning of the arguments, learned Counsel for the petitioner...
Saraswati (Smt.) and anr. Vs. State and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-01-2006
Reported in: RLW2006(4)Raj2714
N.P. Gupta, J.1. This bunch of the writ petitions (above writ, and the writ petitions listed in the Scheduled involve common question of law, and therefore, all these writ petitions (alongwith the writ petition, listed in the Schedule), are being decided by this common order. Out of this bunch, in some of the writ petitions, show cause notices were issued, while some writ petitions have been admitted, in some matters, an interim order has been issued directing giving of provisional admission to the petitioner, with a rider, that, that will not create any right in favour of the petitioners. However, since the controversy involved is very short, and number of matters had arisen, vide order dt. 6.2.2006 all the matters were ordered to be listed together. It was understood, that at this stage itself, all the matters shall be finally decided, and with that understanding arguments were made in the cases that were listed on 20.3.2006 and 22.3.2006. Accordingly those writ petitions had been fi...
Surja Ram Vs. Mool Singh and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-01-2006
Reported in: II(2006)ACC818; 2007ACJ1175
Ajay Rastogi, J.1. Instant appeal was filed by claimant-injured for enhancement of compensation awarded by Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Neem Ka Thana (Sikar) in M.A.C.T. No. 45 of 1992.2. Facts, in brief, are that on fateful day, 8.10.91 at 7 p.m., appellant along with his family members was going on his camel cart from Ranoli to village Sankhuna Ki Dhani on National Highway No. 11, when reached near Bus Stand, Bawri Ke Balaji, offending truck No. RRL 7181 coming from behind with a high speed being driven rashly and negligently had collided with camel cart which resulted in causing grievous injuries to them. The camel succumbed to grievous injuries at the spot and the cart was completely smashed. As per medical certificate dated 25.1.1995 (Exh. A45), since the claimant sustained grievous injuries including posterior head injury on hemiplegia with difficulty in speech and epileptic fits with 100 per cent disability, was not in a position to record his oral statement before Tribunal;...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›