Rajasthan Court June 2005 Judgments
Mahendra Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-02-2005
Reported in: RLW2006(1)Raj105; 2005(1)WLC141
Harbans Lal, J.1. This appeal has been filed by appellant Mahendra Kumar against the judgment and order dated 2.3.2001 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Kota whereby he has been convicted for the offences under Sections 302 and 324 IPC and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 5,000/- in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for one year for the offence Under Section 302 IPC and for the offence Under Section 324 IPC he has been sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years.2. The relevant facts, as per the prosecution version, are that the occurrence which led to the death of Tarun and injury to Om Prakash took place on 8.10.1998 at 9.30 p.m. After the said occurrence deceased Tarun and injured Om Prakash were carried to the Maharao Bheem Singh Hospital, Kota by Kamal PW-6 and Pappu PW-8 who got them admitted there. Emergency operation of Tarun was performed during the night itself, but he succumbed to his injury in the mor...
Tag this Judgment!Shivkaran Buhadia Vs. Official Liquidator
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-02-2005
Reported in: [2006]130CompCas592(Raj); [2006]67SCL349(Raj)
S.K. Keshote, J.1. The petitioner-applicant in his application is praying for grant of the following relief :It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this application be allowed and in view of the facts and circumstances mentioned above the respondent official liquidator be kindly directed to remove the seal and lock from the premises belonging to the petitioner which were under the tenancy of the company (in liquidation) and to hand over the peaceful and vacant possession of the same forthwith to the petitioner.Any other order or direction which this hon'ble court may consider just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the humble petitioner-applicant.2. The premises in question were on rent with the company (in liquidation). The petitioner-applicant, by his letter, dated July 2, 2001, addressed to the official liquidator for handing over of the possession of the premises, in question, to him. The official liquidator replied to the s...
Tag this Judgment!Suo Moto Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-01-2005
Reported in: RLW2005(2)Raj1385; 2005(4)WLC163
N.N. Mathur, J.1. A sordid and obnoxious incident of rape on a foreign lady tourist In the intervening night of 11th and 12th May, 2005 reported In the regional Newspapers evoked the judicial conscience to take suo moto cognizance, considering that the Constitutional Courts vested with the powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, can no more be a silent spectator in the matter of violent crime against women and wait for its turn for dispensation of justice as provided under the relevant provisions of law.2. In order to combat the increasing crime against women and to ensure protection and preservation of their human rights, - the Criminal Justice System needs to be addressed from the point of view of systematic Victim Support Service. There is need to promote proactive role of police as well as the trial Courts. Thus, In order to expedite the investigation, to provide protection to the victim, ensuring production of material witnesses during trial without delay, expeditio...
Tag this Judgment!Manju Surana (Mrs.) Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-01-2005
Reported in: RLW2005(4)Raj2747; 2005(4)WLC633
Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. In the writ petitions No. 3105/2003, 4742/2003, 5867/2003 and 4741/2003 it was averred that carbonated drinks manufactured by Pepsi Co. and Coca-Cola are contaminated, laced with pesticides and contain suspended impurities, which are dangerous to human life. A ban on their sale and use by the public at large was sought. While disposing of the writ petitions vide order dated October 8, 2004, this Court directed the respondent companies Pepsi Co. and Coca Cola, and all other manufacturers of carbonated beverages and soft drinks, to disclose the composition and contents of the products, including the presence of any of the pesticides and chemicals, on the bottle, package or container, as the case may be. On the Special Leave Petitions preferred by the companies the Hon'ble Supreme Court on December 6, 2004 granted liberty to the companies to seek clarification of exactly what kind of disclosure, this Court required them to make. In terms of the order of Hon'ble Sup...
Tag this Judgment!K.K. Metals (P.) Ltd. Vs. Aditya Gear Ltd.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-01-2005
Reported in: [2008]87SCL1(Raj)
ORDERS.K. Keshote, J.1. The Official Liquidator has produced two documents and the same are taken on record as Court Document Nos. 1 and 2.2. Having gone through these two documents I am satisfied that the registered office of the Company is situated in the State of West Bengal. The details of the Company are as under,1. Name of the Company : M/s. Aditya Gears Limited2. Registration Number : 21-735553. Date of Incorporation: 21 -8-19954. Address of the Regd. Office: 21, Princep Street, 1st Floor, Kolkata -700072.3. This petition has been filed in the wrong court.4. Accordingly the orders, dated 10-4-2002, 23-8-2002 and 17-10-2003, are recalled and the winding-up petition is dismissed. The Official Liquidator is directed to supply a Xerox copy of these documents to Shri R.B. Mathur, the learned Counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is at liberty to apply for revival of this petition in case it proves that the respondent Company is situated in the State of Rajasthan....
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›