Rajasthan Court August 2004 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ganpat Lal Mathur and ors. Vs. Mrec
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-02-2004
Reported in: RLW2005(1)Raj160
Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. Instant writ petition preferred by five petitioners raises a common question of law, as to whether benefit of selection grade once granted can be withdrawn unilaterally? 2. As per the undisputed facts all the petitioners after serving the respondent institute stood retired. The petitioners while they were in service had been granted selection grade in view of the Circular dated January 25, 1992 of the State of Rajasthan. After retirement of the petitioners the respondent decided to withdraw the benefit of selection scale so granted to the petitioners and orders of recovery from the retrial benefits were issued. The said orders have been impugned by the petitioners in this writ petition. 3. The respondent in its return raised preliminary objection in regard to maintainability of the petition and averred that since the impugned orders were issued on the basis of the inspection report of Accountant General, Rajasthan, the petitioners were not entitled to any relief...
Mangla Ram Vs. Sital Dass and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-02-2004
Reported in: RLW2005(1)Raj741
Prakash Tatia, J.1. Appellant-defendant No. 1 Mangla Ram has preferred this appeal under Section 46(1) of the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959 (here in after referred as Act of 1959) against the judgment dated 7th April, 2003 passed by the learned District Judge, Pali. The learned District Judge, Pali vide judgment dated 7th April, 2003 allowed the election petition filed by the respondent No. 1-plaintiff Shital Das against the appellant-defendant No. 1 and set aside the election of appellant, declaring him, ward member for ward No. 10 of Municipal Council, Pali. After setting aside the election of the appellant, the court below also declared plaintiff-respondent No. 1 as elected ward member for the ward No. 10 of Pali Municipal Council.2. Brief facts of the case are that election for the ward members for Municipal Council, Pali were held on 26th Nov., 1999. Counting took place on 27th Nov., 1999. The appellant was declared elected by margin of one vote only. The respondent No. 1 cha...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›