Skip to content

Rajasthan Court March 2004 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 03 2004

Ganglya @ Gangaram and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Mar-03-2004

Reported in: RLW2004(2)Raj1358; 2004(2)WLC762

Harbans Lal, J.1. This criminal appeal under Section 454 Cr.P.C. is directed against the order dated 6.3.2000 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jaipur Distt. Jaipur in Sessions Case No. 79/92 whereby the application filed under Section 452 Cr.P.C. has been rejected and their prayer to deliver the silver bangles (Kadas) to them was declined.2. Briefly stated, the relevant facts giving rise to this petition and necessary for its disposal are that an F.I.R. came to be lodged at Police Station Jarnwarangarh (Jaipur) on 24.12.1990 by one Girdhari Lal that Smt. Kani, wife of Ram Kishan, who had gone to graze the cattle was lying dead in the mustard field and her hands and feet were amputated and her ornaments were missing. Accused Kalurarn was arrested. On his discovery statement under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, a knife and silver bangles were recovered at his instance. After investigation a charge-sheet Was filed against him in the concerned court. The case was committed to ...


Mar 03 2004

Dwarka Prashad (Shri) Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Mar-03-2004

Reported in: 2004(2)WLC637

N.N. Mathur, J.1. By way of instant petition under Section 182 of the Code of Criminal Procedure the petitioner has challenged the order dated 10th February, 1994 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, (Special Judge, (Prevention of Atrocities Act) Cases, Hanumangarh refusing to interfere with the order dated 27.8.1990 passed by the Munsiff & Judicial Magistrate, Loonkaransar taking cognizance against the petitioner and others for offence under Section 147, 323, 324, 450 & 149 I.P.C.2. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the instant petition are that Liyaquat Ali the son of second respondent Munshi Khan submitted a written First Information Report on 29.1.1990 at Police Station, Loonkaransar at about 8:30 P.M. stating inter alia that he was in possession of a residential house in Ward No. 14 of Village Loonkaransar. There was some dispute regarding which proceedings were pending in the competent court. But the petitioner herein holding the office of Additional District Magistrate...


Mar 03 2004

Charan Singh Mahala Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Mar-03-2004

Reported in: RLW2004(3)Raj2028; 2004(2)WLC627

Sunil Kumar Garg, J.1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner on 7.10.2003 against the respondents with a prayer that by an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents be directed to grant admission to the petitioner in the Veterinary Nursing Course, 2003-2004 as advertised vide advertisement dtd. 7.6.2003 (Annex.4) issued by the Dy. Director (Training), Animal Husbandry Department, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.2. The facts of the case as put forward by the petitioner are as under:i) The petitioner is a bonafide resident of Rajasthan and he passed his Secondary Examination in the year 2000 from the Board of Secondary Education for Rajasthan in first division with 70.17% marks. Thereafter he passed Sr. Secondary Examinations in Hindi, Chemistry, Biology, English and Physical from National Institute of Open Schooling in the year 2003 which is a institute of Government of India, New Delhi and passed in good Second Div...


Mar 03 2004

Dinesh Pareek Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Mar-03-2004

Reported in: RLW2005(1)Raj289; 2005(1)WLC98

Sunil Kumar Garg, J.1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner on 2.9.2003 against the respondents with a prayer that by an appropriate writ, order or direction the impugned admission list dtd. 29.7.2003 finalised by respondent No. 3 (the Principal, B.R. Mirdha Govt. Post Graduate College, Nagaur) for admission in M.Sc. Previous (Chemistry) for academic session 2003-2004 be quashed and the admission application form submitted to the respondent No. 3 (Principal, B.R. Mirdha Govt. Post Graduate College, Nagaur) which was cancelled on 29.7.2003 be restored and the respondents be directed to admit the petitioner in the M.Sc. Previous (Chemistry) for the academic Session 2003-2004 without any delay etc. etc.2. The facts of the case as put forward by the petitioner are as under:i) The petitioner is a orthapaedically handicapped student. A copy of the medical certificate is marked as ANNEX. 1.ii) Further case of the petitioner is that...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial