Rajasthan Court January 2004 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State of Rajasthan Vs. Shyam Kishan Tewari
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-05-2004
Reported in: [2004(102)FLR850]; RLW2004(2)Raj1099
Keshote, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the entire record and carefully gone through the judgment of learned Single Judge.2. This special appeal under Section 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949 is directed against the judgment dated 4.10.1991 of the learned Single Judge in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4356/1998 filed by the respondent.3. Facts, in brief, of the case are that late Anandi Lal Tiwari, the father of the respondent, was holding the post of accountant in the Cooperative Societies Department of the Government of Rajasthan and while in service and holding that post, he died on 1st January, 1988.4. The respondent submitted an application praying therein for giving him appointment on compassionate ground under the Rajasthan Recruitment of dependents of Government Servants Dying While in Service Rules, 1975 (for short, 'the Rules, 1975') and has claimed for appointment to the post of Accountant. However, appellant No. 2, under the order dated 5th ...
Amina and ors. (Smt.) Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-05-2004
Reported in: RLW2004(1)Raj544; 2004(5)WLC18
Garg, J.1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer that by an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari/mandamus, the impugned part of the judgment dtd. 26.7.2000 passed by the learned Distt. Judge, Churu while granting succession certificate in favour of the petitioners under Section 372 of the India Succession Act, 1925 for a sum of Rs. 5,46,393/-, further ordered that out of the amount of Rs. 5,46,393/-, Rs. 5,00,000/- be deposited in FOR in the names of petitioners for 20 years, be declared illegal and ineffective qua the petitioners.2. The facts of the case as put forward by the petitioners are as under:-i) That late Sh. Nanu Alladeen Teli (hereinafter referred to as the deceased) was husband of petitioner No. 1 Smt. Amina and father of petitioners No. 2 and 3 Ms. Shaheeda and Ms. Rasheeda (both are major) who went abroad to earn his livelihood and for that purpose, he was work...
Anil Sharma and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-05-2004
Reported in: 2005CriLJ713
N.N. Mathur, J.1. By the impugned order dated 24-9-2002, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bikaner has directed enquiry under Section 156 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the petitioners for offence under Section 323, 341, 392 and 182 I. P. C.2. The first petitioner herein Anil Sharma is the Branch Manager of M/s. Mahendra and Mahendra Co. Ltd. at Bikaner. The petitioner No. 2 and 3 Raghuvir Singh and Chhatrashal Singh are the employees of the said company. The said company lodged a First Information Report at the Police Station Kotegate to the effect that one Sahajad Ali was financed a sum to the tune of Rs. 80,000/- for the purchase of a 3-Wheeler. He was required to repay the loan on the monthly instalment or Rs. 3,650/-. As there was a default in the payments of instalment, he on his own left the 3-Wheeler with the complainant company. It is alleged that while the vehicle was parked in the premises of the company, the accused Sahajad Ali forcibly took away the same. D...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›