Rajasthan Court February 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Babulal Saini and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-13-2002
Reported in: 2003(2)WLN593
Misra, J.1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant-United India Insurance Company Ltd. challenging the award dated 26.5.2001 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kotputali, District Jaipur by which an amount of Rs. 1,25,260/- (Rs. One lac Twenty Five thousand two hundred sixty) has been ordered to be paid to the claimant-respondent No. 1 alongwith interest. Learned counsel for the appellant-Insurance Company has assailed this award not on the ground of its quantum but on the ground that the driver of the vehicle was at fault in driving the vehicle and therefore the Insurance Company is not liable to pay the amount of compensation.2. It is difficult to accept this argument for in the prevailing facts and circumstances of this case, it cannot be held that the driver had not taken normal precautions while driving the vehicle as he was having a duly valid license and was also driving normally on the road. Yet if the accident took place, it cannot be held that the driver of th...
Garib Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-13-2002
Reported in: RLW2003(1)Raj390; 2002(3)WLN442; 2002(3)WLN442
Garg, J.1. This misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner-Garib Ram (hereinafter referred to as added accused petitioner) for recalling the order dated 16.1.2002 passed by this Court in S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 282/2000 by which after allowing the application dated 30.3.2000 filed under Section 319 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the prosecution, added accused petitioner was ordered to face trial for the offence under Sections 148, 302/149 (or 302), 326/149 (or 326), 325/149, 323/149 and 307/149 IPC alongwith other accused persons and added accused petitioner was summoned through bailable warrant of Rs. 10,000/-.2. 1 have heard the learned counsel appearing for the added accused petitioner, learned counsel appearing for the complainant and the learned Public Prosecutor.3. The main grievance of the added accused petitioner is that the judgment, which was delivered by this Court on 16.1.2002 in State v. Mangilal and Ors. (1), was passed in his absence as n...
Cit Vs. Mahaveer Polymers
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-13-2002
Reported in: (2002)175CTR(Raj)274
By the courtOn an application filed under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal has referred the following questions for the opinion of this court :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in deleting the amount of Rs. 1,92,904 for calculating the disallowance under sections 37(3A)/37(3B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ?''Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in deleting the amount of Rs. 38,310 being the expenditure on maintenance of delivery van, motorcycle and scooter for calculating the, disallowance under section 37(3A) read with section 37(3B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ?''Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in setting aside the issue and in directing to allow the amount of Rs. 98,208 disallowed under section 43B in case the payments had been made within the time permissible under the relevant law, even if t...
Daulat Ram Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-13-2002
Reported in: 2002(3)WLN437
Sunil Kumar Garg, J.1. This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner-complainant against the judgment dated 29.11.2000 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Churu in Criminal Revision No. 8A/2000 by which he allowed the revision petition filed by the accused respondents No. 2 to 4 and set aside the order dated 8.12.1999 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Churu in Criminal Case No. 586/99 by which the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate took cognizance against the accused respondents No. 2 to 4 for the offence Under Sections 147, 447, 379, 427, 365 I.P.C. on the protest petition filed by the complainant-petitioner.2. It arises in the following circumstances:On 12.2.1999, the complainant-petitioner filed a complaint before the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Churu stating that land of the complainant, petitioner and others is situated in Khasra No. 923 measuring 38 bighas 8 biswas, village Rohi (Churu) and fencing of that land was being done by the complainant-p...
Dinesh @ Banti Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-13-2002
Reported in: 2002(2)WLN635
Jagat Singh, J.1. This is bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. on behalf of Dinesh @ Banti against whom an F.I.R./CR No. 22/02 of P.S. Abu Road City trial is pending before learned Sessions Judge, Sirohi on 31.1.2002. Heard learned Counsel as well as learned Public Prosecutor.2. learned Counsel submits that the motor cycle was left by the complainant and his brother at Abu Road and it was not stolen by the present accused. The above motor cycle was also recovered on the basis of disclosure statement given by co-accused Kailaya and Javeed. He further states that petitioner is a student of 18 years only therefore, he be given benefit of anticipatory bail.3. Learned P.P. has opposed it.4. After considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow this application under Section 438, Cr.P.C. Hence, it is ordered that in the event of his arrest in connection with the CR. No. 22/02 P.S. Abu Road City the applicant Dinesh @ Banti shall be released o...
indu Bala JaIn and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-12-2002
Reported in: 2002(2)WLC407; 2002(5)WLN121
Madan, J.1. The undisputed facts are that the petitioners are the members of Jawaharpuri Grah Nirman Sahakari Samiti (hereinafter referred to as 'the Samiti') and they have filed this writ petition in representative capacity as the members of the Samiti which is a registered Housing Society.2. The case of the petitioners is that the petitioner-Samiti entered into an agreement of sale dt. 31.7.1981 with the khatedara of the land in dispute. Urban Improvement Trust Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as 'the UIT') sought to acquire the land in dispute for planned development of Jaipur City by issuing a notice under Section 52(2) of the Urban Improvement Trust Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1959'). Pursuant to this, khatedara of the land raised objections but the acquisition proceedings had come to an end. Thereafter, the land in dispute was demarcated for the 'residential colony' known as Sriram Colony, Tonk Road, Jaipur, plan of which was submitted to the Additional Colle...
Narendra Singh Rajawat and ors. Etc. Vs. Thakur Mohan Singh Kanota and ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-12-2002
Reported in: AIR2002Raj218; 2002(2)WLC362
Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. In a civil suit challenging the election of the office-bearers of Shri Rajput Sabha, the plaintiff Thakur Mohan Singh, moved an application under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2, CPC. Learned Additional District Judge No. 1, Jaipur City vide order dated January 11, 2002 allowed the application in part and granted temporary injunction in the following terms :(i) Defendant Nos, 2 to 22 be restrained from Operating and controlling the bank accounts, properties and cash belonging to Shri Rajput Sabha without the consent and approval of Brigadier Bhawani Singh, the permanent President of Shri Rajput Sabha till the decision of the civil suit or completion of the term of the executive whichever is earlier. (ii) In the event of non-cooperation by the defendant Nos.2 to 22 the permanent President of Shrt Rajput Sabha shall be at liberty to constitute an ad hoc Committee under Section 9(1) of the Constitution of Shri Rajput Sabha and to conduct the fresh elections within a period...
Smt. Tulsi Devi Somani Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-12-2002
Reported in: 2002(2)WLC374; 2002(5)WLN174
Sharma, J.1. The petitioner in the instant writ petition has challenged the withdrawal of Letter of Intent issued to her by the Indian Oil Corporation (for short the IOC) for awarding Retail Outlet Dealership at location Bhilwara under marketing plan 96-98 Category-Open.2. Pursuant to the advertisement dated August 19, 2000 the petitioner made application that was found to be in accordance with the eligibility criteria formulated by the IOC and after complete scrutiny, verification and satisfaction, the Letter of Intent dated March 28, 2001 was issued by the IOC on the orders of the Dealers Selection Board (for short the DSB).3. Smt. Sumitra Nanawati (respondents No. 3) who was at No. 3 in the merit list served a notice dated April 16, 2001 for demand of justice on the IOC and DSB. Treating the notice as complaint the DSB directed th IOC to conduct inquiry as per para 3.15 of the guide lines. After receiving enquiry report the DSB asked the petitioner to appear before it. Shri C.L. Jha...
Narendra Singh Rajawat and ors. Vs. Thakur Mohan Singh Kanota and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-12-2002
Reported in: 2002(1)WLN709
Sharma, J.1. In a civil suit challenging the election of the office bearers of Shri Rajput Sabha, the plaintiff Thakur Mohan Singh, moved an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC. Learned Additional District Judge No. 1 Jaipur City vide order dated January 11, 2002 allowed the application in part and granted temporary injunction in the following terms;(i) Defendants No. 2 to 22 be restrained from operating and controlling the bank accounts, properties and cash belonging to Shri Rajput Sabha without the consent and approval of Brigadier Bhawani Singh, the Permanent President of Shri Rajput Sabha till the decision of the civil suit or completion of the term of the executive whichever is earlier.(ii) in the event of non-cooperation by the defendants No. 2 to 22 the permanent President of Shri Rajput Sabha shall be at liberty to constitute an adhoc committee under Section 9(1) of the Constitution of Shri Rajput Sabha and to conduct the fresh elections within a period of three months...
Mehmood Khan Vs. State Through Pp
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-12-2002
Reported in: 2002CriLJ2123; 2002(2)WLC380; 2002(1)WLN707
Parihar, J.1. The incident is alleged to have taken place on 6.3.2000. It has been alleged that the petitioner along with three other co-accused threw acid on the family members of the complainant resulting in multiple acid burns on five persons including four ladies. After investigation, the police filed challan against the petitioner and three other co-accused for offence under Sections 458, 459, 324, 326 and 307/34 IPC.2. The petitioner submitted a bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This court, vide order dated 31.7.2000, while disposing of the bail application, directed the trial court to determine the age of the petitioner considering the provisions of the Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 (hereinafter to be referred to as 'the Act'). As per the directions of this court, the trial court, after taking evidence of both the sides, held that the petitioner was more than 16 years of age at the time of the incident vide order dated 26.8.2000.3. The order date...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »