Rajasthan Court July 2001 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Mohani Khandelwal Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-10-2001
Reported in: 2002(3)WLN114; 2002(3)WLN114
Verma, J.1. Vide judgment dated 26.7.2000 (annexure-4) the academic qualification prescribed for recruitment to the post of Lady Shiksha Sahayogi had been prescribed as Senior Secondary/Higher Secondary/equivalent with the 18 years minimum age. The application was submitted on plain paper/application giving bio-data. The selection was by the concerned Gram Panchayat. The petitioner had applied as one of the candidate. It is reiterated vide annex.5 that the selection is to be made as per advertisement. The petitioner was selected. As per annex. 4 it has also been mentioned that if suitable candidate possessing qualification is not available in that situation even 8th pass candidate can be considered. Vide annex.6 further instructions have been issued on 30.4.2001 mentioning therein that the academic qualification would be Senior Secondary (academic) or equivalent.2. The petitioner submits that she has passed Senior Secondary vocational and had applied as per annex. 4. But now vide annex...
Prahlad Rai Vs. Pradeep Kumar and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-10-2001
Reported in: II(2002)ACC147; 2003ACJ1822; 2002(1)WLC654; 2002(2)WLN311
Panwar, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and award dated 12.9.94 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Bhilwara (hereinafter for short 'the Tribunal') by which the learned Tribunal held the appellant contributory negligent to the extent of 50% and awarded compensation in favour of the appellant for a sum of Rs. 1,19,000/- alongwilh interest @ 12% p.a. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the judgment and award impugned, the appellant- claimant has filed this appeal seeking enhancement.2. Brief facts which are necessary for decision of this appeal are thus; on 18.5.92 at about 5.30 PM the appellant was proceeding from Triveni Chauraya to Bigod on Spark moped No. RRE 5046 at a moderate speed. The said moped was driven by him fully under control. When he was plying over Triveni River bridge, at that time, a truck No. MP 14 C 1397 was also proceeding ahead of him, which came to be stopped suddenly by its driver respondent No. 2, without any signal or indication, th...
Miss Parul Agarwal Vs. University of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-10-2001
Reported in: AIR2002Raj70; 2002(5)WLC824; 2002(1)WLN571
Sharma, J.1. The allegations against the Private Educational institutions in the instant writ petitions are that their only aim is to make money, driving a hard bargain, exploiting eagerness to acquire a professional degree which would be a passport for employment in our country rampant with unemployment. The facts of the writ petitions remind me a popular couplet of Sanskrit Poet BHARTHAR1 HARI. who in his 'NEETISHATAKAM, consisting of the hundred couplets, wrote (English translation).'Education is the teacher of the teacher; Education is God incarnate; Education secures honour at the hands of the State, not money, A man without education is equal to animal.'In the life of an individual the right to education has been treated as one of transcendental importance. These writ petitions relate to the right of the petitioners to take the examination of Master of Business Administration.2. Common questions that arise for consideration in all these four writ petitionsare:(i) Whether after al...
Arjun Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-10-2001
Reported in: 2001CriLJ4621
Sunil Kumar Garg, J.1. This appeal has been filed by the accused-appellants against the judgment and order dated 26-2-1999 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Udaipur in Sessions Case No. 13/99 by which he acquitted the accused Anna Kunwar and Prem Kunwar of the charge for the offence under Section 376/114, I.P.C. and also acquitted accused-appellant Arjun Singh of the charges for the offence under Sections 366 and 363, I.P.C. and also acquitted accused-appellants Kishan Singh and Onkar Singh of the charge for the offence under Section 363, I.P.C., but convicted the present accused-appellants Kishan Singh and Onkar Singh of the charge for the offence under Section 366, I.P.C. and Arjun Singh of the charge for the offence under Section 376, I.P.C. and sentenced them in the following manner:___________________________________________________________________________________Name of accused- Convicted under Sentence awardedappellants section________________________________________________...
Ajmer Vidhyut Vitaran Nigam Vs. Bherulal and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-10-2001
Reported in: 2002(3)WLN348
Prakash Tatia, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the appellant as well as learned Counsel for the respondents.2. The appellant has challenged the judgment and decree passed by the trial court dated 2.6.2000 by which the trial court awarded damages total amounting to Rs. 1,65,500/- to the plaintiffs.3. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiffs who were the legal representatives of deceased Hira Lal filed the present suit alleging that defendant No.1 appellant (earlier Raj. State Electricity Board) is liable for the damages caused due to the death of deceased Hira Lal at the age of 30 years on 3rd Oct., 1996. According to plaintiffs the defendant No. 2 respondent No.8 was the helper employed with the appellant. There was an electric connection from the well of the plaintiffs ruining towards the well of Shankar Lal defendant No. 3 and there were five electric poles in the between the plaintiffs well and well of the Shankar Lal. The electric connection of Shankar Lal was disconnected si...
Krishan Murari Agrawal Vs. Madho Lal Tak
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-10-2001
Reported in: 2001(3)WLC396; 2002(3)WLN116
Gyan Sudha Misra, J.1. The petitioner is a defendant in a suit for eviction which has been filed by the plaintiff-landlord-Madho Lal, on the ground of default in payment of rent alleging that he had inducted the defendant-petitioner in the suit premises fixing the rent at the rate of Rs. 800/- per month which he has failed to pay. The suit premises is a Godown situated inside the Chowk of a 'Haveli', Mishrarajaji Ka Rasta in which the defendant-petitioner is said to be carrying business of making kites in the Godown. In view of Section 13(3) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1950, the trial Court (being the Court of Civil Judge-Junior Division West, Jaipur City, Jaipur) had to determine the rent which was last paid by the defendant-tenant to the plaintiff-landlord.2. However, the defence case of the petitioner inter alia is that although he was inducted as a defendant to use the Godown by the plaintiff-landlord, the agreed rent which he was required to pay to ...
Jagdish and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-10-2001
Reported in: 2002(4)WLN267
Jagat Singh, J.1. This appeal has been filed under Sub-section (2) of Section 371 Cr.P.C. against the judgment and order dated 29th April, 2000, delivered by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, No. 1, Bhilwara, by which these four appellants were convicted under Section 395, I.P.C. and each of them has been sentenced to 5 years rigorous imprisonment along with fine of Rs. 1000/-. Aforesaid judgment has been assailed herein by filing this appeal.2. I have heard at length learned Counsel for these accused appellants Shri B.N. Kalla as also learned Public Prosecutor and have perused the judgment as also evidence available on the file.3. A perusal of the file reveals that at 10:30 AM on 13.6.1998 in Bhilwara City, at a shop named Rishabh Motors, PW-3 Deepak, aged about 12 years was sitting and his father Chand Mal was out of shop. A little time before one Dinesh came there and handed over Rs. 25,000/-to Deepak to be handed over to his father, which the latter put in a bag, Article-1 and thereaft...
Jagdish Thakur Vs. Manoj Sharma
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-09-2001
Reported in: 2001WLC(Raj)UC648
Misra, J.1. The appellant-herein was the defendant in a suit for eviction against whom the decree has been passed,2. The plaintiff-respondent had filed the suit for eviction against the defendant-appellant under Section 13(l)(f) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1950 (for short, the Act of 1950') which lays down that the tenant is entitled to be evicted from the rented premises, if he is guilty of mis-representation in any manner denying the title of his landlord. The specific provision to that effect is reproduced as follows:-'13. Eviction of tenants.@1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any law or contract, no Court shall pass any decree, or make any order, in favour of a landlord whether in execution of a decree or otherwise, evicting the tenant (XXX) so long as he is ready and willing to pay rent therefor to the full extent allowable by this Act, unless it is satisfied - (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) '13(1)(f) that the' tenant has renounced his character as such...
National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Smt. Kamla Kanwar and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-09-2001
Reported in: 2002ACJ1394
Panwar, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and award dt. 21st August, 1991 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Udaipur (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal'), whereby the Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs. 1,50,000/- in favour of the respondent-claimants (hereinafter referred to as 'the claimants') and against the appellant.2. The brief facts of the case which are necessary for disposal of the appeal are that; on 19.5.1987 at about 9.00 am., deceased Abhey Singh driver of auto rickshaw No.RRY 2062 was proceeding from the road leading to Fateh High School, Udaipur, at that relevant time, a bus No. RJY 4703 came from opposite direction which was driven rashly and negligently by driver respondent No. 5 Devi Lal, hit the auto rickshaw. Due to this accident, the driver of auto rickshaw Abhey Singh and other passengers of auto rickshaw viz. Ram Singh and Roop Singh sustained server injuries and Abhey Singh succumbed to injuries. The legal representatives of deceas...
Sikhar Chand (Now Dead) through L.R.'s Vs. Santi Kumar and Anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-09-2001
Reported in: 2002(1)WLC537
Sharma, J.1. This second appeal instituted by the defendant arises out of a suit for eviction from the premises situated a Chowkri Modi Khana Jaipur. The plaintiffs sought for the decree of eviction on the ground of default in making payment of rent. Out of six issues that were framed by the learned trial court issue No. 1 as regards default in payment was the core issue. Both the parties adduced evidence and the learned trial court decree the suit on the ground of default under Section 13(1) (a) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 (for short 1950 Act) vide judgment and decree dated January 29, 1991. After unsuccessful first appeal the defendant preferred the instant second appeal.2. This court while admitting the appeal on October 10, 1991 framed following substantial questions of law :(i) Whether the courts below were justified in holding that the decree for eviction can be passed under Section 13(1)(a) of Rajasthan Rent Control Act even if the defendan...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »