Rajasthan Court June 2001 Judgments
Suman Steels Vs. Ito
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-29-2001
Reported in: (2002)73TTJ(NULL)874
ORDERS.R. Chauhan, J.M.This appeal by assessee for assessment year 1991-92 is directed against the order of Commissioner (Appeal's), Jodhpur, dated 2-3-1994.2. I have heard the arguments of both the sides and also perused the records.3. The assessee-appellant has raised six grounds of appeal but ground Nos. 2 to 6 have not been pressed by the learned authorised representative of assessee during arguments so the same are dismissed accordingly.4. Ground No. 1 disputes the addition of Rs. 37,926 made on account of undervaluation of closing stock. The learned authorised representative of assessee has contended that the assessee has valued the closing stock on cost though cost has been taken in three categories as per three categories of stock. He has contended that those part of the closing stock which represented the goods purchased recently that is in the period near the accounting year ending date, (in the month of March) was valued on actual purchase price on the basis of their purchas...
Tag this Judgment!Kanhaiya Lal and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-28-2001
Reported in: 2002(2)WLN79
Khem Chand Sharma, J.1. This case is one of the glaring examples of sexual exploitation of a teenaged helpless village girl below 16 years of age by able bodied youth.2. These four appeals by the accused appellants are directed against the judgment and order dated 15.4.1998, by which the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Special Judge, Women Atrocities and Dowry Cases) has convicted and sentenced the accused appellants in the following manner: I. Accused appellants Ramjilal, Kanhaiyalal, Hemraj and Radhey Shyam - under Sections 376 and 376/120-B IPC: Each to undergo 7 years RI with a fine of Rs. 500/-. in default of payment of fine, to further undergo 3 months RI on the first count and on the other count, to undergo 7 years RI with fine of Rs. 500/-, in default thereof, to further undergo 3 months R.I. II. Accused appellants Radhey Shyam and Ram Kishan - under Section 292 IPC: Each to undergo one year RI with a fine of Rs. 500/- each, in default thereof, to further undergo 3 months RI...
Tag this Judgment!Bhikam Singh and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-22-2001
Reported in: 2001(3)WLC460; 2001(4)WLN121
Sharma, J.1. These two appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 9.4.1999 passed by the Special Judge, NDPS Cases, Jhalawar, by which he has convicted the accused appellants under Section 8/18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (For short 'the Act') and sentenced each of them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years with a fine of Rs. 10,0000/- each, in default thereof, to further undergo 1 year's rigorous imprisonment.2. The prosecution casein nut shell is, that on 24.4.97 Shri Chawand Singh, SHO, Police Station Manohar Thana, Jhalawar received telephonic information, Ex.P.23 to the effect that two persons would be carrying opium below the seat of a motor cycle bearing No.MP 087 A 1011. He reduced the information to writing in Rojnamcha at serial No. 767, Ex.P.25. Thereafter, Shri Chawand Singh alongwith police parly rushed to Semali Hat Jod, Aatn Road, Manohar-,thana, Beenaganj. At 8.00 PM, a motor cycle came from the side of Manohar Than...
Tag this Judgment!Kalua Alias Laxman Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-22-2001
Reported in: 2002(1)WLN149
Khem Chand Sharma, J.1. This criminal appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 1.6.2000 passed by the Special Judge, NDPS Act Cases (Sessions Judge, Bharatpur, whereby he has convicted the accused appellant for offence Under Section 8/21 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter to be referred as 'the Act') and sentenced him to 10 years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 1 lac, in default thereof, to further undergo one year's rigorous imprisonment.2. Briefly stated that facts of this case are that PW. 8 Rameshwar Prasad received an information on 16.9.1995 at 12.15 P.M. from informer that one person is in search of selling smack in Chhapar Mohala. Having received the information, he recorded the same in the 'Rojnamcha' and informed the officers superior on telephone and also sent the information in writing. Thereafter, Shri Rameshwar Prasad, SHO Kumher alongwith the witnesses and police party rushed to the disclosed place. The SHO stopped a pe...
Tag this Judgment!ito Vs. Gopal Ram Prem Ram
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-19-2001
Reported in: (2001)72TTJ(NULL)698
ORDERS.R. Chauhan, J.M.As the above cases involve common points, so we are disposing them of by this common order for the sake of convenience.2. ITA No. 469/Jd/1999 is an appeal by the revenue and ITA No. 521/Jd/1999 is an appeal by assessee, both for assessment year 1996-97 and both are directed against the same order of Commissioner (Appeals), Udaipur, dated 8-7-1999. CO. No. 03/Jd/2000 has been filed by assessee in respect of revenues appeal being ITA No. 469/Jd/1999.3. ITA No. 455/Jd/1999 is an appeal by revenue and ITA No. 447/Jd/1999 is an appeal by assessee, both for assessment year 1995-96 and are directed against the common order of Commissioner (Appeals). Udaipur dated 29-6-1999. CO. No. 28/Jd/2000 is assessees CO is respect of revenues Appeal No. 455/Jd/1999.4. I have heard the arguments of both the sides and have also perused the records.5. First I take up ITA No. 469/Jd/1999 being revenues appeal. The revenue has taken only one ground disputing the learned Commissioner (Ap...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India and Others Vs. Ex-subedar Naurang Ram Bugalia
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-01-2001
Reported in: 2001(3)WLC4
Parihar, J. (1). The person, actively served the Indian Army for 34 years and retired on 18.8.1973, on attaining the age of superannuation, still knocking the doors of the Court to get his due pensionary benefits.(2). The respondent - Ex-Subedar Naurang Rain Bugalia was enrolled in the Indian Army in Rajputana Rifles as an Infantry Soldier on 20.5.1936, wherein, he has served for a period of 10 years and 192 days from 20.5.1936 till 27.11.1946. After the Second World War been over, he was released from the Raj Rifles as a Subedar with minimum pensionary benefits of mustering out pension @ Rs.45/- per month.(3). The respondent - writ petitioner was again called for to join Ihe Indian Army as Subedar during the period w.e.f. 31.8.1948 to 19.5.1951 due to hostility between India and Pakistan. The respondent was discharged w.e.f. 19.5.1951 after serving the Army for two years and 252 days. Subsequently, the services of the respondent were required by the Army Head-quarters (AG's Branch- MT...
Tag this Judgment!Hari Bux Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-01-2001
Reported in: 2002(5)WLC318
Madan, J.(1). This criminal appeal is directed against the judgment of the Sessions Judge Sikar whereby the appellant has been convicted under Section 304(II) IPC and sentenced to undergo seven years' RI with a fine of Rs. 200/- (in default, further one month's SI).(2). The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 27.5.99 one Pokharram lodged a written report at PS Laxmangarh (Sikar) stating therein that he was called by his daughter Santosh who is married to Shrawan S/o Ganpat because at 7 PM there was scuffle in between Shrawan Kumar & his brother Haribux, and upon this information he went to Santosh's place where it was given out by her inter-alia that on that day at about 5 PM her husband Shrawan was beaten by his elder brother Haribux by inflicting blows with iron rod 'jelly' on left side of his chest resulting into his death and his dead body had been lying in the field, and that the incident of beating was seen by Mevaram, Santosh and her mother in-law (mother of deceased Shrawan ...
Tag this Judgment!Kalyan Dutt Sharma Vs. Judge, Industrial Tribunal
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-01-2001
Reported in: 2002(5)WLC586; 2003(2)WLN215
Madan, J. (1). The undisputed facts are that on 13.9.1965 the petitioner was appointed as 'Karya Karla' in the services of Rajasthan Khadi Vikas Mandal, Govind Garh, Distt, Jaipur, respondent No. 2. He was working in the services of the said organisation till 8.5.1978 when he was served with a charge sheet by the management on account of irregularities committed by him while performing his duties with the said organisation. He submitted reply to the charge sheet. The petitioner denied all the charges being false, baseless and being of no consequence. It has been alleged that since the management was bent upon to victimise the petitioner, a domestic enquiry was held in the matter by Shri D.N. Sharma, a permanent advocate of respondent No. 2. The contention of the petitioner is that he was not supplied with the enquiry report recommending his dismissal from the services of respondent No. 2 therefore, he could not file representation against his dismissal order dt. 6.9.1978. Thereafter, r...
Tag this Judgment!Jamila and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-01-2001
Reported in: 2002(2)WLC453; 2001(4)WLN255
Verma, J.1. The petitioner Sirajuddin was working as Constable having so appointed on 18.9.1976 and when he had put in about 20 years of service he developed heard disease and was treated in Govt. Hospital at Jaipur and the pace maker was installed. The petitioner was refunded the amount of Rs. 43,000/- spent by him for operation vide order dated 21.9.94 (Ann. 1). He was advised for complete rest. The petitioner was deputed at the residence of Addl. Supdt. of Police Police Line, Jaipur to perform his duties, where according to petitioner he felt some difficulty because of previous heart disease and continued to be under treatment till July, 1995, as per medical certificates (annexure 2 to 8).2. Even though the petitioner states that he had informed the respondents about his sickness and for extension of leave, but still the department issued the charge sheet to petitioner for remaining absent, without information as alleged w.e.f. 1.11.94 and joined only on 17.6.95. The charge sheet wa...
Tag this Judgment!Gupta Chemicals (P) Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-01-2001
Reported in: 2002(5)WLC653
Madan, J.1. In this criminal misc. petition, others dated 30.3.2000 (Ann. 3) of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magislrate Bhawani Mandi (Jhalawar) confirmed by the Special Judge (SC/ST Prevention of atrocities Act) Jhalawar on 15.9.2000 (Ann. 4) have been challenged with further prayer to quash proceedings pending against petitioners (1) Gupta Chemicals (P) Ltd. & (2) Pushpendra Gupta in Cr. Case No. 149/95.2. In nut shell the circumstances resulting in prosecution of the petitioners are that on 31.7.1992 an Insecticide Inspector Ram Swaroop Sharma holding post of Agriculture Officer. Plant Protection inspected shop of M/s Ramchandra Jai Narain Bhutra Bhawani Mandi and took a sample of Sungor 30% EC, Batch No. SE10 having manufacturing date as January 92 & expiry as June 93. This sample was sent for analysis and as per its report of 20th October 1992 it was not conforming to prescribed standards, thereby a show cause notice was sent on 20.12.92 to the dealer, distributor and manufacturer. Th...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »