Rajasthan Court May 2001 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajasthan Vidya Peeth Vs. State and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-18-2001
Reported in: 2001(4)WLN560
Balia, J. (1). In all these cases a common question has arisen in the context of recruitment Rules framed by the Governor of Rajasthan under proviso to Article 309 for recruitment to the posts under the Rajaslhan Educational Subordinate Service Rules 1971 (hereinafter called, 'the Rules of 1971').(2). One of the posts encadred under the Rules of 1971 is the Senior Teacher. The requisite qualification prescribed is-'Graduate or equivalent examination with atleast two subjects taught in the school with Degree or Diploma in Education or Montessory.'(3). The petitioners in Writ Petitions No. 4309/96, 3343/98, 4307/96, 4308/96 and 4310/96 are all who held B. Ed. Degree from Rajasthan Vidya Peeth Udaipur, a Demand University and were already recruited as Order 11 Teacher in Udaipur Division by the Education Department. They were given a show cause notice stating that the B.Ed. Degree obtained by the said petitioners after completing B.Ed.'(Child Development) had undergone a bridge course whi...
Dungar Ram and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-18-2001
Reported in: 2002(3)WLN328
Garg, J.1. The abovenamed accused appellants have preferred this appeal against the judgment and order dated 3.9.1997 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 3 Sri Ganganagar, Headquarters at Sri Karanpur in Sessions Case No. 16/97 (Old No. 66/94) whereby he convicted and sentenced the accused appellants in the following manner: -Name of accused appellantsConvictedunder SectionSentence awarded to each accused appellant1. Dungar Ram1481PCThree Year's R1 Life Imprisonment & fine of Rs. 100/-, in default of payment of undergoone month RL2. Khayali Ram302/149 IPC3. Banwari Lal4. Hari Ram307/149 IPCTen Years' R1 and fine of Rs. 100/-, in defaultof payment of fine, to further undergo one month R1.5. Shankar Lal6. Raghuveer Singh7. Surendra27 Arms ActFive years' R1 and fine of Rs. 100/-, in defaultof payment of fine, to further undergoone month R18. Madan Lal9. Sohan Lal10. Bhagirath147 IPCTwo years' RL302/149 IPCLife Imprisonment & fine of Rs. 100/-, in defaultof payment of fine,...
Rajendra Kumar and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-18-2001
Reported in: 2001(3)WLC361; 2002(1)WLN410
Mathur, J.1. Appellants Kailash, Naresh, Rajendra Kumar alias Shunty were put to trial on the charge of conspiracy, robbery & murder of one Mst. Vimla. The learned Additional Sessions Judge No.2, Sri Ganganagar, by his judgment dated 12.12.1997 convicted all the three appellants for the offence under Section 302/34 IPC and sentenced each of them to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo three months' rigorousimprisonment. They have also been convicted for the offence under Section 392/397 IPC and sentenced to seven years' rigorous imprisonment & to pay a fine of Rs. 5000/- & in default of payment of fine, to further undergo two months' rigorous imprisonment. The appellants have also been convicted for the offence under Section 120-B and sentenced to seven years' rigorous imprisonment. One Mst. Indu has also been convicted for the offence under Section 414 IPC and sentenced to three years' rigorous imprisonment & ...
Ladoo Ram Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-18-2001
Reported in: 2002CriLJ749
Jagat Singh, J.1. This appeal has been filed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 22nd December, 1998, passed by learned Special Judge, Special Cases, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Cases, Bhilwara in Sessions Case No. (216/96) 228/97 convicting the accused-appellant for offence under Section 8/18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter 'the Act') and sentencing him to imprisonment for 10 years and to pay a fine of rupees one lac, in default of payment whereof to further undergo eight months' rigorous imprisonment.2. The concise facts relevant for the disposal of this lis are that at about 8.30 p.m. on 27-6-1996 in the city of Bhilwara at Chunginaka No. 2, Rajesh Kumar Meena, Sub-Inspector; PW-3-P.K. Sinha, Superintendent along with other supporting staff of the Narcotics Control Bureau (hereinafter 'the Bureau') were members of the checking party, as they had an information that some contraband is being transpo...
Jagdish Prashad Chandelia Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-18-2001
Reported in: 2001(4)WLN393
J.C. Verma, J.1. The petitioner was appointed in the Rajasthan Administrative Service (here-in-after called RAS) on 17.10.1974 vide Annexure-1 as having been selected by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission. He was promoted to the senior scale on urgent temporary basis on 29.2.1979, but later on the recommendations of the selection committee, was put on senior scale vide letter dated 11.10.1984 (Annexure-2) against the quota of 1980 and again promoted to the post of selection scale on urgent temporary basis vide order Annexure-3 dated 7.2.1987. Because of the reason that certain other persons had been promoted to the selection scale regularly vide order dated 6.12.1986, but the petitioner was not considered and, therefore, being aggrieved the petitioner filed an appeal before the Rajasthan Civil Service Appellate Tribunal which appeal was decided on 22.7.1987 and a direction was given to the respondent to convene a meeting of the DPC for promotion of the petitioner to selection scal...
Roop Narayan Vs. Shambhoo Lal
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-17-2001
Reported in: 2002WLC(Raj)UC232
Panwar, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 19.4.1993 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Nimbahera in Civil Misc. Case No. 14 of 1992 whereby he dismissed the application filed by the plaintiff-appellant under Order9 Rule 8, CPC dated 28.5.1990 and refused to restore the Original Civil Suit No.4I/88.2. Brief facts of the case, are that the plaintiff-appellant filed a money suit for recovery of Rs. 10,668/- against the defendant-respondent before the learned District Judge, Pratapgarh Camp Chittorgarh, which was subsequently transferred to the Court of learned Additional District Judge, Nimbahera.3. On 25.9.1989, in the presence of counsel for the parties, the suit was adjourned to 25.11.1989 for hearing of the arguments on an application filed by the plaintiff-appellant under Order 38 Rule 5, CPC and for filing of the written statement. On 25.11.1989, the case was called on but no one appeared for the plaintiff-appellant. However, counsel for the defenda...
Lal Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-17-2001
Reported in: 2001(3)WLC788; 2001(4)WLN573
Mathur, J. (1). This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 4.11.1997 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Barmer, convicting appellant for offence under Section 302 l.P.C. and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and , to pay a fine of Rs. 100/-; in default of payment to further undergo 15 days simple imprisonment. The appellant has also been convicted for offences under Section 7/25 Arms Act and sentenced to under go 1 year rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 100/-; in default of payment of further undergo 15 days rigorous imprisonment. Both the sentence have been ordered to run concurrently. (2). Briefly stated the prosecution case is that on 2.6.94 at about 11:20 A.M., P.W. 1 Ladu Ram gave a written report Ex.Pl to P.W. 18 Babulal S.H.O., Police Station, Barmer staling inter alia that at about 11:00 A.M., he had gone lo see his brother Hartal on the roadways Bus Sland, where he was on duty in the Enquiry Cabin. At that time appellant Lal Singh along with...
Panna Lal and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-17-2001
Reported in: 2002(1)WLC358; 2002(1)WLN468
Balia, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. This petition was filed in 1990 before this court. On constitution of Rajasthan Taxation Tribunal, the petition was transferred to said Tribunal. However, the petition could not be decided by the Tribunal during the life of that Tribunal and on its abolition, the petition has been re-transferred to this court and has been re-numbered 1931/99, the original number of the Writ Petition was 3540/90.3. The facts in brief leading to this petition are that the petitioners were granted privilege/licence for the retail shop for a sum of Rs. 16,06,666.72. The shop for which the retail licence was granted was situated at Sadul Sahar. The petitioners had lifted requisite quantity of liquor and have paid the entire contract money for the year 1977-78. However, at the close of the year stock of the country liquor at the issue price value of Rs. 2,33,238/- remained with the petitioners on which rebate has been allowed to me petitioners at the time ...
Abdul Majid Alias Raju Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-17-2001
Reported in: I(2002)DMC730; 2002(1)WLC164; 2002(1)WLN435
Mathur, J. (1). This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 30th January, 1996 passed by the Sessions Judge, Jodhpur convicting the appellant Abdul Majid for offence under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. He has also been convicted for offence under Section 498A I.P.C. and sentenced to two years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000/-; in default of payment to further undergo two months simple imprisonment. Both the sentences have been ordered to run concurrently. (2). Briefly stated that prosecution case is that on 18.6.1995, P.W. 12 Chandan Singh, Incharge, Police Station, Soorsagar, Jodhpur at about 6:45 P.M. received a telephonic message from Mahatma Gandhi Hospital to the effect that Mst. Jarina has been admitted in the Hospital with 90% burn. He reached to the Hospital and found Smt. Jarina wife of Abdul Majid alias Raju admitted on Bed No. 5 of the Burn Unit. He submitted an application Ex.P. 13 addressed to the duty doctor...
Thakur Nahar Singh Jasol Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-17-2001
Reported in: 2001(3)WLC778; 2002(1)WLN448
Shethna, J. 1. Thakur Nahar Singh Jasol, Chief Administrator of the City Palace Museum (Maharana Mewar Charitable Foundation) Udaipur addressed a letter dated 18.11.1999 to Hon'ble Justice Vishnu Sadashiv Kokje, Judge, Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur alongwith a copy of application dated NIL submitted by as many as nine applicants to the District Collector, Banner and a copy of the letter dated 12.10.1999 addressed to Shri R.N. Arvind, I.A.S. Collector, Disirict Barmer.2. We fine from the noting made on mis petition that as per the orders, it was listed in Chamber on 22.11.1999.3. On 22.11.1999 their Lordships V.S. Kokje and Mohd. Yamin, JJ. passed the following order in chamber:-22.11.1999HON'BLE MR. V.S. KOKJE, J.HON'BLE MR. MOHD. YAMIN, J.(IN CHAMBER) Perused the papers. In our opinion, it is a fit case for being entertained as Public Interest Litigation. Issue notice to the Collector of District Barmer as also to Thakur Ganga Singh Jasol, owner of Survey No. 116, village Tenlawas, T...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »