Rajasthan Court December 2001 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhanwari Devi (Smt.) Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-05-2001
Reported in: RLW2003(3)Raj2047; 2003(1)WLN509
Mathur, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the widow Smt. Bhanwari Devi aggrieved of the th order of the Dy. Director, Ordinary Insurance Fund rejecting her claim under the Group Personal Accident Insurance Scheme for the government employees.2. The petitioner's husband Shri Ram Niwas was serving as a Teacher in Government Primary School, Chitani, Police Station, Mundwa. On 9.8.97 when her husband was working on his own farm house, he alleged to have received electric shock at Tube Well. He was taken to the hospital, where he was declared dead. The doctor issued a certificate Annexure-2 certifying that Ram Niwas died due to electric shock. Petitioner submitted a claim vide application dated 6.9.97 for grant of benefit of Group Personal Accident Insurance as her husband expired due to electric shock. The application was forwarded by the third respondent Vikas Adhikari, Panchayat Samiti, Mundwa to the second respondent i.e. Dy...
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Sanju Agarwal and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-05-2001
Reported in: I(2002)ACC720; 2002ACJ720
J.C. Verma, J.1. Rs. 9,28,000 had been awarded by the M.A.C.T., Jaipur vide award dated 1.2.2000 to the widow of the deceased who had died in an accident. The deceased was 33 years of age and multiplier of 17 was applied by the Tribunal concerned. The deceased was the Manager in a transport company and the pay had been assessed as per salary certificate.2. After hearing learned Counsel for the parties, I do not find any infirmity in the order passed by the Tribunal so far as the assessment of compensation is concerned. There is hardly any necessity to interfere with the aforesaid award passed by the Tribunal.3. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed....
Regional Manager, Punjab National Bank and anr. Vs. Rajvir Singh
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-04-2001
Reported in: [2002(95)FLR639]; 2002(2)WLC173
Keshote, J.1. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, perusing the writ petition, its enclosures and reply to the writ petition I am satisfied that this petition is wholly misconceived.2. Challenge has been made by the petitioner in this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution to the order dated 22.11.1997 of the Labour Court, Jaipur in CLC No. 45/95.3. Under this order the Labour Court has accepted the claim of the respondent workman of Rs. 60, 205.83 of the difference of the subsistence allowance. The respondent workman was placed under suspension and against him the criminal complaint has been filed and chargesheet has also been served for departmental enquiry.4. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute that on the application of the respondent workman the departmental enquiry has been stayed pending the criminal case. Learned counsel for the petitioner further admits that in the criminal case the respondent workman has been acquitted. In view of the fact...
Abdul Rahman Vs. Smt. Prasony Bai and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-04-2001
Reported in: 2002(2)WLC488; 2003(3)WLN560
M.R. Calla, J.Heard learned counsel for the appellant. It is not necessary for us to give history of the litigation in detail because the same has been narrated meticulously by the learned Single Judge in the impugned judgment and order dated 29.11.2001. On the basis of facts of the case, learned Single Judge has found that controversy between the parties stood decided finally with regard to cancellation of the allotment to Abdul Rehman i.e. the present appellant and also the mutation in favour of Smt. Prasony Bai i.e. the respondent who had suffered the agony of this litigation for decade together. The litigation had started in the year 1979 and ended on 14.6.1999 after two rounds of litigation. The present appellant having failed in the previous litigations filed the present suit No. 17/99 with the prayer for declaration that Smt. Prasony Bai is not the daughter of Mangal Singh and 'SANAD' allotted to her in February, 1986 is illegal, that the plaintiff Abdul Rahman is in adverse pos...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›