Rajasthan Court November 2001 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Goverdhan Bahari Kaushik and ors. Vs. State and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-01-2001
Reported in: RLW2003(3)Raj1963
Keshote, J. 1. The petitioners by this petition are praying for quashing and setting aside of the seniority list prepared on 19.3.97 in the cadre of Principals Sr. Sec. Schools.2. This petition has been filed by the petitioners in the Court on 29.8.97. The writ petition was admitted ex parte which is clear from the order dated 19.9.97.3. Though nobody is present on behalf of the respondents but I find that they filed preliminary objection and reply to the writ petition on 16.7.2001. A copy of this preliminary objection cum reply has been given to the learned counsel for the petitioner on that very day.4. The petitioners have not filed their rejoinder to the preliminary objection cum reply of the writ petition.5. The learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute that it is a service matter and against this impugned order right of appeal is available to the petitioners under these Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal Act, 1976. However, it is submitted that as this petition...
Abdul Haq Ansari Vs. Ito and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-01-2001
Reported in: (2002)173CTR(Raj)90
Arun Madan, J.Heard learned counsel for the parties.The petitioner-firm by way of this writ petition, has challenged the assessment orders dated 31-1-1989 and 22-8-1989, passed by the Income Tax Officer, Jaipur and the Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur respectively, for the years 1975-76 to 1979-80 on the grounds inter alia that the firm's business had been adversely affected due to the money block on petitioner's account in USA to the tune of US $ 1,24,122.51 with the assessing officer Ansari to whom goods were exported in USA. The petitioner, in para 3 of the writ petition indicated the income of the petitioner's firm for the assessment years 1975-76 to 1979-80 in the following manner :Assessment YearIncome assessed (Rs.)1975-7618,2901976-772,294 (loss)1977-781,539 (loss)1978-791,29,0971979-80Nil (loss declared at Rs. 34,850)It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner being an uneducated person, who is a partner of the firm, the firm earned a profit...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›