Rajasthan Court October 2000 Judgments
Ganesh Shankar Vs. Rajasthan High Court
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Oct-09-2000
Reported in: 2001(1)WLC119; 2001(1)WLN171
ORDERBalia, J.1. In this appeal, a valiant effort has been made by the learned counsel for the petitioner-appellant for persuading us to refer the issue about the validity of the Rule 15(2) of the Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1969 (for short, 'the Rules of 1969') read with definition of the Court under Rule 3(d) of the Rules.(2). The question had arisen because of the eligibility criterion prescribed for direct recruitment under the Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service in the Advertisement dated 28.10.99 to the extent it prescribes the following eligibility criterion:^^ 4- ;ksX;rk,a % lsok esa lh/khHkorhZ ds fy, vH;kFkhZ%1 Hkkjr dk ukxfjd gks] ,oa2 vf/koDrk gks] ftlusjktLFkku] mPp U;k;ky; ;k mlds v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa esa U;wure 7 o'kZ vof/krd odkyr gh gksA**(3). Translated into English, it means an Advocate who has practised in Rajasthan High Court or any courts subordinate thereto for a minimum period of 7 years is eligible for recruitment. The rule prescribing eligibility und...
Tag this Judgment!inayat Ali Usta Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Oct-09-2000
Reported in: 2001(4)WLC615; 2001(2)WLN16
Hon'ble Shethna, J.(1). Shri Akhtar All Usta, father of the petitioner Inayat Ali Usta was serving as a Senior Turner (Anudeshak) in the office of the Principal Industrial Training Institute, Bikaner. While on duty, he died on 2.10.1997, leaving behind him his widow Nasiban aged 50 years and four sons; (i) Mukhliar Ahmed aged 34 years married and doing private job, (ii) Mushtak Ahmed, aged 32 years married and working in M.E.S. with Central Govt. (iii) Inayat AH (present petitioner) aged 30 years married and unemployed and (iv) Ashraf Ali aged 25 years, married and studying.(2). On 22.10.1997 widow Nasiban made an application (Annex.2) for giving employment to her third son-Inayat Ali on the ground that he is unemployed, therefore, in her place he may be appointed on the death of her husband. The said request was rejected by the respondent department on the ground that his one of the brothers Shri Mushtak Ahmed is serving in M.E.S. in Central Govt. therefore, the petitioner filed writ ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›