Rajasthan Court January 2000 Judgments
Sayed Faizul Mustfa Vs. Judge, Labour Court and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-04-2000
Reported in: (2001)IIILLJ77Raj; 2000(2)WLC578; 2000(2)WLN21
J.C. Verma, J.1. An industrial dispute reference was made to the Labour Court, Jaipur, by the State of Rajasthan to adjudicate upon the legality or justification of the termination of service of the petitioner by the respondent-management. A preliminary objection was taken to the effect that because of the applicability of the provisions of the Rajasthan Relief Undertaking (Special Provisions) Act, 1961, and because of the institution of respondent 1 was being a relief undertaking, the proceedings under the Industrial Disputes Act were not applicable. Copy of such objection is attached as Annexure 2. The Labour Court had rejected such preliminary objections vide its order, dated March 22, 1991, copy of which is attached as Annexure 3. The evidence was led by the parties. The Labour Court vide the impugned award, dated May 13, 1997, non-suited the petitioner on the same grounds/objections which preliminary objection stood already rejected vide Annexure 3 as far back in 1991.2. Being agg...
Tag this Judgment!Dhir Singh and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-04-2000
Reported in: 2001CriLJ235; 2000WLC(Raj)UC309; 2000(2)WLN81
V.G. Palshikar, J.1. Being aggrieved by the order of conviction dt. 20-11-1984 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Balotra camp at Banner in criminal case No. 41/1983, convicting the accused appellants for the offence under Section 374, Cr.P.C., this appeal is preferred on the ground mentioned in the memo of appeal and also verbally canvassed before me.2. With the assistance of the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned Public Prosecutor, I have scrutinised the record and reappreciated the evidence on record.3. After going through the evidence and reappreciating the same, it was argued by the learned counsel for the appellants that following serious discrepancies are revealed by the record and therefore, the order of conviction is not sustainable :-(1) The first information report is lodged after a delay of three days and there is no explanation forthcoming which is reasonably satisfactory in nature explaining the delay :(2) Immediately after occurrence of the incident, t...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›