Rajasthan Court September 1997 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Cheeku Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Sep-02-1997
Reported in: 1998CriLJ950; 1998(2)WLC158; 1997(2)WLN421
ORDERAmaresh Ku. Singh, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.2. This petition under Section 482, Cr.P.C. is directed against the order dated 5th Feb. 1997 passed by the learned Special Judge, S.C./S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Mertain Sessions Case No. 75/92 State v. Cheeku Singh alias Shatrudarnan Singh. By the aforesaid order dated 5th Feb. 1997 the learned Special Judge directed that Herak Mohammed, in whose presence the dying declaration of Shri Jiya Ram was recorded, be summoned for examination under Section 311, Cr.P.C. It was observed by the learned Special Judge that it was in the interest of justice to summon Shri Herak Mohammed.3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in this case the prosecution had closed its evidence. The accused petitioner had been examined under Section 311, Cr.P.C. and the case was listed for final arguments and it was not necessary in the interest of justice to call the witness...
Velji Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Sep-02-1997
Reported in: 1998CriLJ970
ORDERA.S. Godara, J.1. This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed under Section 397, Cr.P.C. against the appellate judgment and order dated 17-8-88 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Dungarpur upholding convict-petitioner's conviction under Section 3 read with Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act and sentencing him to undergo two years' R. I. and a fine of Rs. 2500A and, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo six months' R. I., by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dungarpur.2. Since petitioner's son Purushottam, who was al so tried by the trial Judge but, stood acquitted of the aforesaid charges and hence his case of acquittal is not under consideration.3. Briefly stated, the facts of the prosecution case, giving rise to the present petition, are that the petitioner is the resident of village Damdi, District Dungarpur. The petitioner was holding a licence (Ex. P-l), for carrying on business in oil and oil-seeds under the provisions of the Rajasthan Edible Oils and ...
Jagdish Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Sep-02-1997
Reported in: 1998CriLJ718
ORDERP.C. Jain, J. 1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 10-3-1997 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Bali whereby he framed the charges against the accused-petitioner for the offences under Sections 307 and 326 read with Section 120B, I.P.C. in sessions case No. 40 of 1996.2. For appreciating the background of the case, the learned counsel submitted that at the relevant time the petitioner was posted in Govt. Community Health Centre, Takhatgarh District Pali and was residing with his family in the Govt. Quarter situated within the campus of the Hospital. Dr. S.P. Purohit, Dr. Jitendra Choudhary and Dr. (Mrs.) Sobha were also posted in the said Hospital. On account of the roaring practice of the petitioner, relations between petitioner and two other private practitioners viz., Dr. Rama Shanker Awasthi and Dr. Chandan Gandhi became strained because their clientage was adversely affected and they were on the look out for taking revenge on the petitioner. ...
Surendra Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Sep-02-1997
Reported in: 1998WLC(Raj)UC318; 1997(2)WLN415
M.P. Singh, J.1. Appellants filed the writ petition praying for a direction to the respondents, restraining them from changing the use of land reserved as 'open space marked by letters ABCD and EFGH in the plan and that the sale made by the Urban Improvement. Trust (In short, 'UIT) in favour of State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur (In short, the Bank') on 4.12.1989 be declared null and void.2. The UIT, Bikaner is a body cooperate incorporated under the provisions of Rajasthan Urban Improvement Trust Act, 1959 (referred to as 'the Act). It is empowered to frame schemes for residential purposes. Schemes are sanctioned by the State Government. Thereafter it is implemented.3. Framing of scheme is controlled by the provisions of Section 29 of the Act. The relevant portion runs as follows:29. Schemes; matters to be provided therein:--(1) The Trust shall, on the orders of the State Government or on its own initiative or on a representation made by the Municipal Board and subject to availability of ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›