Rajasthan Court August 1997 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ram Prasad Vs. Hari NaraIn and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-01-1997
Reported in: AIR1998Raj185; 1997(3)WLC631; 1997(2)WLN393
ORDERShiv Kumar Sharma, J. 1. Core question that springing for consideration in this revision is as to whether power-of-attorney holder of a party is entitled to appear as a witness on behalf of the said party2. This question arises in the following circumstances.(i) The plaintiff-petitioner (for short the plaintiff) instituted a suit for injunction and possession of the property against the defendant non-petitioner (for short the defendants). The defendants files written statement and issues were framed by the learned trial Court. The case, therefore, was posted for recording the evidence of the plaintiff. (ii) The plaintiff, in the meanwhile, moved an application praying that his son Satya Narayan, being his general power-of-attorney holder, may be allowed to appear as witness on his behalf. The defendant contested the said application. The learned trial Court vide its order dated November 15, 1996 dismissed the said application. Hence this revision. 3. Before adverting to the rival ...
Jhabarmal Vs. Rajasthan Housing Board and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-01-1997
Reported in: I(1999)ACC240; AIR1998Raj254; 1997(2)WLN391
ORDERJ.C. Verma, J. 1. After completing all the formalties of submitting the applications and depositing the registration amount alongwith seed money amount of Rs. 12,500/- and Rs. 50,000/- respectively, the petitioner was allotted House No. 4/ 139 on 17th of October, 1992, at Jawahar Nagar Scheme, reserved for the employees of the Rajasthan Housing Board against the registration year 1987. Despite the allotment made and completing formalities the petitioner was some-how not delivered the possession whereas other similarly situated persons who were below in the registration list had been handed-over the possession. The petitioner made representations to the respondent Housing Board for the delivery of the possession. The petitioner was informed vide Annexure 2, by the respondents on 4-7-94, to the effect that because of certain stay order having been obtained by one Shri Sultan Singh, from the High Court, it is not possible to handover the possession of the house to the petitioner. The...
Rajendra Singh and anr. Vs. Smt. Asha Mehta
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-01-1997
Reported in: 1998(2)WLC518; 1997(2)WLN192
Amaresh Ku. Singh, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel for the non-petitioner.2. This petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code is directed against the order dated 8th December, 1988 passed by the learned Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Bhilwara by which order the learned Judicial Magistrate took congnizance of the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 498A' of the Indian Penal Code and directed the issue of summons against the accused petitioners Rajendra Singh and Vridhi Singh.3. The facts of the case may be briefly summarised as below:4. Non-petitioner Smt. Asha filed a complaint (No. 13/88) in the Court of learned Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Bhilwara on 15th March, 1988. In her complaint she made allegations against Rajendra Singh, Vridhi Singh and Smt. Sur Sundari W/o Vridhi Singh in respect of the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code. On 15th March, 1...
Makhan Singh Vs. Smt. Bant Kaur
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-01-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)WLC378; 1997(2)WLN195
Amaresh Ku. Singh, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.2. This criminal petition under Section 482 Cr. P.C. is directed against the order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge on 27th February, 1996 in criminal revision No. 45/95 Makhan Singh v. Bant Kaur whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge upheld the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ghadsana, by which interim maintenance allowance was granted to the non-petitioner Smt. Bant Kaur.3. The amount of maintenance awarded by the learned Judicial Magistrate was, however, reduced to Rs. 400/- to 300/-.4. Being aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge the petitioner Makhan Singh has approached this Court under Section 482 Cr. P.C.5. The learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that even if the averments made by the non-petitioner Bant Kaur, in the petition as well as in the affidavits that she is the married wife of the petitioner Makhan Singh, is taken as true...
Rajasthan Public Service Commission Vs. Ramesh Chandra Pilwal
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-01-1997
Reported in: 1998WLC(Raj)UC189; 1997(2)WLN232
M.P. Singh, J.1. The technique of scaling, normalisation and moderation, in evaluating the answer sheets in the competitive examinations, where candidates appear in mass, is an accepted procedure adopted by the Public Service Commission.2. The Union Public Service Commission has already adopted this technique and is applying it in the various examination conducted by it.3. The Rajasthan Public Service Commission has also made the same technique applicable to the examinations conducted by it since 1993 where large number of candidates are appearing and large number of examiners are involved in evaluating the answer- sheets. A Division Bench of this Court in the case reported in 1994 (1) RLR 533 (Mahesh Kumar Khandelwal v. State of Rajasthan), has already accepted the application of this technique as valid. The Supreme Court has also approved it.4. The learned Single Judge, while allowing writ petitions No. 3272/1997 (Ramesh Chand Pilwal and Ors. v. Rajasthan Public Service Commission) a...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›