Rajasthan Court July 1996 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.L. Paladia Vs. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangthan and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-01-1996
Reported in: 1997(2)WLC644; 1996(2)WLN178
V.K. Singhal, J.1. The petitioner is working as Principal in Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangthan and is facing Department Enquiry on the basis of alleged misconduct of demanding Rs. 500/- as bribe from Sergent Narendra Verma on 13.5.1991. In the present writ petition the grievance has been raised that the Disciplinary Authority has not permitted the petitioner to have the defence nominee of his choice. It is submitted that the Discipoinay Authority has permitted the employee of CBI as Presenting Officer. The prayer of the petitioner is that the respondents be directed to permit the petitioner to appoint a retired employee of the Government as his defence assistant or in the alternative it has been prayed that Suresh Kumar could not be allowed to be the Presenting Officer or the petitioner be permitted to engaged a legally trained person or an advocate.2. The respondent is a registered society and in accordance with the decision taken by it the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control & ...
Smt. Laxmi Devi Vs. Shree Ram Traders and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-01-1996
Reported in: 1996(1)WLN462
R.R. Yadev, J.1. Instant revision has been filed against the order dated 2.11.1995 passed by learned District Judge, Jodhpur allowing the application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC of Keshav Singh, non-petitioner No. 2, who claims himself to be landlord of the disputed shops.2. According to Shri Keshav Singh it Is he who lets out the disputed shops to tenant M/s Shree Ram Traders, non-petitioner No. 1, and he does not want to evict him. It is also alleged by Shri Keshav Singh, non-petitioner No. 2, that he is an old disabled man and his daughter plaintiff Smt. Laxmi Devi in collusion of her husband Shri Narayan Singh fraudulently obtained a sale deed on 2.9.1992 without consideration.3. It is to be noticed that Smt. Laxmi Devi filed the present suit against M/s Shree Ram Traders, tenant, non--petitioner No. 1, for arrears of rent and ejectment on the grounds of default in payment of rent and bonafide necessity claiming herself to be owner and landlord on the basis of alleged sale deed dated...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›