Rajasthan Court March 1995 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Magan Lal Vs. Chabi Lal
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-08-1995
Reported in: AIR1996Raj103
ORDERB.J. Shethna, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. This petition is directed against the impugned order dated 3rd Feb. 1995, passed by learned trial Judge, by which he closed the evidence of the defendants, on the ground that the defendant failed to keep his witnesses present and he himself is not ready to give evidence and he wants time on the ground that his Advocate has gone out. By that order, the case was fixed for hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the parties on 10-2-1995. On 10-2-1995, an application was moved by learned counsel for the defendant before the trial court praying for some time to enable him to approach the High Court for obtaining appropriate order against the order passed by the learned trial Judge on 3rd Feb. 1995. Time was granted by the learned trial Judge up to 4-3-1995 and it is stated at the Bar by learned counsel for the petitioner that now the matter is kept on 25th March, 1995 for hearing the arguments of learned counsel for ...
The Bundi Chittorgarh Kshetriya GramIn Bank Vs. Presiding Officer, Cen ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-08-1995
Reported in: (1996)IIILLJ1177Raj; 1995(3)WLC458; 1995(1)WLN600
N.C. Kochhar, J.1. The brief facts, giving rise to this writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, against the award dated November 22, 1991 (Annexure 9), passed by the learned Central Industrial Tribunal, Jaipur ('the Tribunal') in Case No. C.I.T. 36/1988, are as under:The Bundi Chittorgarh Kshetriya Gramin Bank ('the petitioner-bank'), after selecting Shi Gagan Bihari Pareek (the respondent No. 2) for the post of Filed Supervisor, issued to him the appointment-letter dated May 22, 1985 (Annexure 1), offering him the said post in the pay-scale of Rs. 640-20-900-25-1000-30-1180. According to the term, contained in the appointment-letter, he was to be on probation for a period of two years, which period could be extended by the petitioner-bank in its absolute discretion, and during the period of probation, his services were liable to be terminated, without assigning any reasons, with one month's notice or one month's emoluments in lieu thereof The appointment...
Sohan Lal and ors. Vs. Khetu Lal and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-08-1995
Reported in: 1995(2)WLC742; 1995(2)WLN394
B.J. Shethna, J.1. The respondents-plaintiffs filed a suit for possession against the appellants-defendants on the ground of personal necessity in the year 1970. The trial court found in favour of the plaintiff on the point of their personal bonafide requirement. But, on the ground of comparative hardship, the trail court dismissed the suit by its order dated 29th of May, 1981. In appeal, the learned Judge not only found in favour of the personal requirement of the plaintiffs, but also found that greater hardship will be caused to the plaintiffs if the suit is not decreed. Therefore, on 29th of January, 1994 he allowed the appeal and set-aside the decree passed by the trial court and decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiffs.2. Though no stay was granted by this Court against the impugned order, the decree is not executed on the undertaking given by the learned Counsel for the plaintiffs.3. This second appeal was earlier placed for orders before my learned brother Milap Chandra Jain...
Mangi Ram @ Mangi Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-08-1995
Reported in: 1995(3)WLC423; 1995(1)WLN329
V.G. Palshikar, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 21.4.94 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sriganganagar, Camp at Srikaranpur, in Sessions Case No. 72/94. The learned Judge has, by the said order, convicted the appellant Under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code for seven years' rigorous imprisonment and pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-. In default, further to undergo three months' simple imprisonment.2. On 30th August 92, First Information Report was lodged by Smt. Krishna Bai stating that she, along with her 'Jethani' went in the field of Vijay Pal for cutting grass in the evening of 26.8.92 at about 5.00 p.m. When she was taking the grass, both accused persons Mangiram and Krishnalal came there, caught hold of her and took her to the adjoining field. There Krishna Lal caught her by arms and Mangiram committed rape on her. It is stated in the First Information Report that the prosecutorix was dragged in the field of cotton and held by Krishnalal who gagged her...
Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. S.S. Kothiyal and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-08-1995
Reported in: 1995(2)WLC288; 1995(1)WLN351
P.K. Palli, J.1. This special appeal is directed against the order dated 6.12.1990 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby the writ petition filed by the petitioner S.S. Kothiyal was allowed. Aggrieved against this decision the Union of India has filed the present appeal.2. The petitioner (Respondent No. 1 in the appeal) joined as Commissioned Officer in the Indian Army as IInd Lieutenant on 30.6.1963. The petitioner was promoted as Captain in the year 1965 and Acting Major in the year 1966. The petitioner was released from the Army Service on 16.9.1967 and was absorbed in the Border Security Force where he was already working on deputation for some time as Assistant Commandant.3. Respondents No. 3 to 38 likewise the petitioner were recruited as Emergency Commissioned Officers and it is an admitted position that all these 36 officers were likewise absorbed in the Border Security Force and continued to be juniors to the petitioner. It is said that respondents No. 3 to 12 were promot...
Mool Chand Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-07-1995
Reported in: 1995CriLJ4206; 1996(2)WLC60; 1995(1)WLN335
ORDERRajendra Saxena, J.1. This petition filed under Section 482, Cr. P. C. is against the order dated 25-11 -94 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Bikaner, whereby relying on the opinion of the Medical Board, he held that the petitioner was capable of facing trial and defending himself in the court and ordered for proceeding with the trial against him. 2. A case was registered against the petitioner for the offences under Sections 302 and 452, I.P.C. for the alleged murder of Vishnu Acharya. After usual investigation, a challan was filed against the petitioner for the offences under Sections 452 and 302, I.P.C. before the learned Magistrate, who committed the case to the learned Sessions Judge. During trial, a plea was raised on behalf of the petitioner that he was suffering from mental disease and was not capable of defending himself. The learned trial Judge directed the Superintendent, Psychiatric Centre, Jaipur to examine the petitioner and submit his report, who vide his ...
Dr. Sudhir Baldwa and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-07-1995
Reported in: 1995(2)WLC420; 1995(1)WLN404
V.K. Singhal, J.1. This order shall dispose of all the above listed writ petitions as the point involved in all of them is identical. For the purpose of disposing of the writ petitions, the facts of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6325/94. Dr. Sudhir Baldwa V State of Rajasthan and Another will be taken.2. The petitioner Dr. Sudhir Baldwa passed his MBBS from the SMS Medical College, Jaipur in the year 1992-93 and appeared in All Rajasthan Pre-P.G. Entrance Examination, 1994 and was declared successful and was placed in the merit position at No. 113-1 in the over-all merit prepared in the Pre-P.G. He was initially allotted P.G. (Medicine) at RNT Medical College, Udaipur vide order dated 1.6.1994 and in the first re-shuffling he was given preference for Ajmer in the same speciality vide order 13.7.94. It is stated that one Dr. Om Prakash Garg was also allotted M.D. Medicine at Jaipur and an application for mutual transfer was submitted by Dr. Garg from Jaipur to Ajmer and by Dr. Baldwa fro...
Bhani Ram and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-06-1995
Reported in: 1995CriLJ3165; 1995(2)WLC309; 1995(1)WLN294
V.G. Palshikar, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 6-2-91 in sessions case No. 64/89, by the Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Raisinghnagar. The learned Judge has, by the impugned judgment, convicted the appellants under Sections 302/149 of the Penal Code and sentenced them to imprisonment for life. He also found them guilty under Section 148 of the Penal Code and sentenced them for one year's rigorous imprisonment. They were also sentenced for one year's rigorous imprisonment under Section 27 of the Arms Act. This order is challenged in this appeal.2. The prosecution story briefly stated is that on 24-3-1989 at about 4 and 4.15 in the evening, the complainant was sitting in the medicine shop of Ramchandra, near the Bus Stand of village Ramsinghpur. The accused Bhani Ram and Purkha Ram were also sitting in the shop. Then Om Prakash and his brother Hansraj came to the shop and Bhani Ram and Purkha Ram left the shop. Bhani Ram signalled towards the bus stand and the ...
Servesh Kumar and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-05-1995
Reported in: 1995(1)WLN618
N.L. Tibrewal, J.1. The petitioners have moved this application for anticipatory bail in Crime No. 325/94 registered at Police Station, vishwakarma, Jaipur City, under sections 420 and 406 IPC. All the petitioners are on interim bail since February 20, 1995. During the pendency of this bail application the parties were directed to negotiate for a compromise and the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the Bank of Rajasthan made efforts to negotiate for exploring some amicable settlement, but they could not arrive at any compromises, as such, the matter was finally heard on May 18, 1995. Mr. Dhankhar, Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioners, vehemently contended that an open running and current account of the petitioners' firm with the Bank is operating since 1980 and a cash credit facility to the extent of Rs. 15/- lacs was provided by the Bank to the firm in May 1990 and the firm has been sending accounts/statements to the Bank regularly, but, however, the firm was closed in ...
Smt. Abha Devi Vs. Rajasthan State Electricity Board and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Mar-02-1995
Reported in: AIR1996Raj102
B.R. Arora, J. 1. The appellant, who is the original petitioner in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2833 of 1986, challenged the Demand of Rs. 7616.81 created by the Rajasthan State Electricity Board vide letter dated 4-12-1986 (Annexure 1) pertaining to the month of Sept. 1986, and the bill of the same date (Annexure 1/A). 2. The contention of the learned counsel for the appellant, challenging the demand raised by the R.S.E.B. before the learned single Judge as well as before us, is that the Demand created is not authorised by any provisions of law and Section 26(6) of the Indian Electricity Act casts a duty upon the Board to get the consumption of electricity determined from the Electrical Inspector and in the absence of determination by the Electrical Inspector, the demand could be created only on the basis of the meter-reading in the Registrar of Meters. The learned single Judge, by his judgment dated 5-1-1987, dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner-appellant by holding th...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »