Rajasthan Court August 1994 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Murlidhar Maharia Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-03-1994
Reported in: 1995(1)WLC595; 1994(2)WLN281
P.K. Palli, J.1. The petitioner has died during the pendency of this petition and the legal representatives have been brought on record in this case.2. The petitioner was an Audit Inspector in the Cooperative Department. On 15.6.1977 he proceeded on leave for one day. As averred in the petition his condition deteriorated. On 17.6.1977 a neighbour was requested to take his application but he could not carry it and instead a phonogram was sent on 18.6.1977. The petitioner received a letter on 20.6.1977 that his leave has been refused and he should proceed to Raisinghnagar to audit the accounts there. The petitioner did not carry out this direction and applied for leave by telegram. On 21.6.1977 a registered letter was sent to the petitioner which he refused to receive but received when the same letter was sent him in open manner. On 4.7.1977 the petitioner moved an application on the desired form for grant of leave from 15.6.1977 to 3.7.1977. This was accompained by a medical certificate...
Mohd. Nazim Khan Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-03-1994
Reported in: 1995(2)WLC702; 1994(2)WLN601
Rajendra Saxena, J.1. Heard. Perused the record of the learned lower court.2. This petition filed Under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been directed against the order dt.8.10.92 passed by the learned Civil Judge cum Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bali in Criminal Original Case No. 311/86, whereby he took cognizance against petitioner Mohd. Nazim Khan, the then Vikas Adhikari, for the offences Under Section s 420, 468, 471 and 120B IPC.3. It appears that the S.D.M. Bali by his letter dated 29-8-86 informed the S.H.O., P.S. Bali that one Sardar Mal, who is by caste Rawal Brahmin, procured a certificate dated 12.7.81 (Ex. P.4) from Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Sesli to the effect that he was a member of the Scheduled Caste and that on the basis of certificate Ex. P.4, he also issued certificate dt. 17.7.81 in favour of Sardarmal and that thereupon the latter improperly enjoyed the facilities provided by the State Govt. to a member of the scheduled caste. He also mentioned In his letter that the said Sa...
Hira Chand and anr. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-02-1994
Reported in: 1994(3)WLC702; 1994(2)WLN459
Gokal Chand Mital, C.J.1. The land in dispute was acquired by notification dated 21st August, 1969 issued Under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act'). It was followed by notification dated 28th of February, 1973 issued Under Section 6 of the Act, which was published in the Gazette on 12th April 1973. This acquisition was challenged by the land owners in this court and finally it was upheld by the Apex Court vide judgment dated 27th of April, 1981. The result was that the acquisition notifications issued Under Section 4 and 6 were held to be valid.2. On 31st of May, 1985, a letter was issued by the State Government proposing the utilization of the land acquired in a particular way by allotting some portions to some private persons and the balance for some other purpose indicated according to procedure mentioned therein.3. Thereafter, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1432/1988 and S.B. Civil Writ petition No, 1949/1988 were filed in this Court to challenge the afo...
State of Rajasthan and ors., Etc. Vs. Mahendra Singh and ors., Etc.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-01-1994
Reported in: AIR1995Raj21; 1994(2)WLC543
P.P. Naolekar, J. 1. This judgment shall govern the disposal of D.B. Civil Special Appeal No. 329/84 also. 2. Writ Petition No.' 1391/76 was filed by late Shreeji Maharana Shri Bhagwat Singhji of Mewar, whose legal representatives have been brought on record, against the officers of the State of Rajasthan and the State of Rajasthan, challenging the impugned demand dated 24-2-1975 (Annex. 5) issued by the Tehsildar, Girwa, for Rs. 34099.89 relating to the land revenue and irrigation charges under S. 3 of the Rajasthan Land Reforms and Acquisition of Land Owners Estate Act, 1963 (hereinafter called as 'the Act') and the order of the Tehsildar dated 18-3-1975 (Annex. 6) and the order of the Board of Revenue dated 22-6-1976 (Annex. 7). The properties for which the demand has been raised are: (i) Samore Bagh palace and garden, (ii) Champa Bagh palace and garden, (iii) Sahelion Ki Bari, (iv) Khas Odi, (v) Gordhan Vilas, and (vi) Sheel Nikunj. 3. It was contended by the petitioner in the writ...
State Vs. Shree Ram Verma
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-01-1994
Reported in: 1994(2)WLN600
G.C. Mittal, C.J.1. The respondent No. 1 was bye passed while making promotions; he felt aggrieved and, therefore, moved the matter before the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal after considering the matter came to the conclusion that there is no reason assigned for superseding the respondent, and it allowed the appeal, and gave him benefit of promotion directing that a new D.P.C. be convened and the case of the respondent be considered. Before the new D.P.C. could meet to consider the case of the respondent, the State of Rajasthan has come to this Court in writ petition against the order of Tribunal.2. We had sent for the record of the case relating to the regular selection by D.P.C.3. We have got the record and after going through the same find that the name of respondent No. 1 was there before the D.P.C. but no reason has been provided in the proceedings of the D.P.C. as to why the respondent was not considered fit for promotion.4. It is submitted by the learn...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›