Rajasthan Court April 1994 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhilwara Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and or ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-04-1994
Reported in: 1994(1)WLN431
Rajesh Balia, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. This petition is directed against the order Annexure/9 dated October 21, 1991 passed by the Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bhilwara exercising power of the Registrar under the Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 under Section 32 rescinding the Resolutions of the Board of Directors of the petitioner Bank.3. The Resolutions which have been rescinded are:1. That, vide Resolution dated March 3, 1990 by which 770 nominal members of the Bank were converted into regular share holders on payment of share capital to at the tune of Rs. 4,99,700.00.2. The Resolution dated April 28, 1990 by which the emoluments of four retired persons were increased to Rs. 75/- per day from Rs. 55/- per day.3. The Resolution dated January 1990 by which one Shri Banshi Lal Dargad was appointed as Managing Director of the Bank for a period of two years, and4. The Resolution dated August 12, 1991 by which accepting the recommendation No-...
Atumal Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-04-1994
Reported in: 1994(1)WLN467
Rajesh Balia, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. Notices were ordered to be issued on September 3, 1992. The respondents were served before September 1992. No reply has been filed inspite of taking time by the respondents on October 23, 1992.3. The short question which arises in this petition which is apparent from the orders passed by the District Rehabilitation Officer, (Janganagar dated April 17, 1990 (annexure/1), the District Collector and Chief Settlement Commissioner dated December 19, 1991 (Annexure/2) and the Divisional Commissioner Bikaner dated April 2, 1992 (Annexure/3) is that the petitioner was allotted certain lands in Chak No. 13 total 5 Bighas and 4 Biswas. In the first instance, the petitioner has not received the sanad of land allotted to him. In his first application for grant of sanad, he gave reference to the new muraba numbers for the purpose of grant of sanad. That application of his was rejected on the ground that the land described in the applicatio...
Smt. Sushila Kanwar Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-04-1994
Reported in: 1994(2)WLC647; 1994(2)WLN559
Rajendra Saxena, J.1. D.B. Civil Habeas Corpus Petition No. 5828/93 has been filed by Smt. Sushila Kanwar w/o life convict Shyam Singh, whereas D.B. Cr. Misc. Parole Petition No. 155/94 has been filed by Shyam Singh himself. Since the relief sought in the afore-mentioned petitions is same, those are being decided together by a common order.2. The undisputed facts are that petitioner Shyam Singh was admitted in jail as an under-trial prisoner on 3.6.1986. He was convicted by the learned Sessions Judge, Jodhpur for the offence Under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentenced to life imprisonment. The appeal against his conviction is pending in this Court. The convict Shyam Singh as per report of the Superintendent of Central Jail has already served out sentence of eight years, one month and twelve days as on 6th Dec., 1993. The State in its reply has also admitted that the conduct of petitioner Shyam Singh in the jail has been found normally satisfactory. This is also not in dispute that convict S...
Babulal Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-01-1994
Reported in: 1995CriLJ269
V.G. Palshikar, J.1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction dated 28-9-87 delivered by Sessions Judge, Jalore in sessions case No. 13/87 convicting the appellant accused under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentencing him to imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- in default further to undergo 2 Years rigorous imprisonment.2. The prosecution case is that the accused killed his wife Sushila and daughter aged about 2 Years by putting them on fire on 2nd January 1987 at about 7 P.M. in village Mandwala in Jalore Dist. The first information report was lodged by the father of the deceased Sushila in which he stated that he has definite doubt that Sushils and her daughter Ritu have been killed by her husband Babulal and his mother and sister However, there is no staement in the F.I.R. regarding any curelty to the wife by Babulal. The only complaint is that there was skirmish between Sushila and her mother-in-law and sister-in-law. There is no complaint that ...
The Lecturers Association Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-01-1994
Reported in: 1994(2)WLC271; 1994(1)WLN283
Jasraj Chopra, J.1. This case comes up for orders on an application filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by applicant Rajasthan Shiksha Sewa Parishad (for short 'the Parishad') for impleading it as a party to this writ petition on the ground that in case, this writ petition challenging the Notification Annexure-1 dated 30.10.1993 issued by the Govt. of Rajasthan is allowed then it will adversely affect the rights of the Head Masters of the Secondary Schools, who are the members of the applicant Parishad.2. This application has been opposed at the bar by Mr. M.R. Singhvi, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner. However, Mr. C.R. Jhakhar, the learned Deputy Govt. Advocate appearing for respondent Nos. l to 3 has nothing to say about this application.3. We have heard Mr. M.R. Singhvi, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. M.S. Singhvi the learned Counsel for the applicant-Parishad.4. It was contended by Mr. M.S. Singhvi the learned Counsel appearing for...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›