Rajasthan Court November 1994 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhagirath and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-10-1994
Reported in: AIR1995Raj153; 1995(3)WLC744
ORDERR.R. Yadav, J.1. The petitioners have filed the instant writ petition seeking the relief to quash the orders of the Deputy Commissioner, Colonisation, Suratgarh dated 11-7-1979 and 6-12-1982 vide Annxs. 6 and 8 respectively passed in favour of respondent No. 5 for making allotment of the land in his favour and for directing issuance of 'Patta' in pursuance of the order dated 11-7-1979,. The petitioners are further seeking relief by means of the instant writ petition for quashing the order dated 6-12-1982 (Annx. 9) to the writ petition passed by the same authority rejecting the application of the petitioner No. 2 for permanent allotment of the surplus land of petitioner No. 1.2. After service of the notices, respondent No. 5 has filed counter-affidavit denying the allegations made in the writ petition. A preliminary objection is raised on behalf of respondent No. 5 that against the impunged orders mentioned above, the petitioners have an alternative remedy of filing an appeal and r...
Navneet Rai Vs. Otmal
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-09-1994
Reported in: AIR1995Raj119; 1995(2)WLC190
P.P. Naolekar, J.1. The decree for ejectment from the suit premises on the ground of personal need was granted against Navneet Rai. During the pendency of the appeal, Navneet Rai died on 21-3-1992 and his legal representatives Ku. Shashi Gupta (daughter), Suresh Prakash, Vijay Prakash and Anil Gupta were joined as a party in his place in the second appeal vide order dated 30th July, 1992.2. The matter came up for hearing.3. It is contended by the counsel for the respondent that the legal representatives are not the tenants within the meaning of Section 3(vii)(b) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 (for short, 'the Act') and, therefore, this appeal be dismissed.4. On the other hand, it is contended by the counsel for the appellant that as the legal representatives have already been joined as a party in the second appeal, the question whether they are the tenant or not, can only be decided after enquiry to the effect whether they fall within the definition ...
Rewant Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-08-1994
Reported in: 1995CriLJ772
B.R. Arora, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 24-1-94, passed by the Special Judge, N.D.P.S. Cases Court, Jodhpur, by which the learned Special Judge convicted the appellant for the offences under Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act and under Section 3/25 of the Indian Arms Act and sentenced him to undergo ten years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- and in default of payment of fine further to undergo one year's rigorous imprisonment for the offence under Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psycho-tropic Substances Act (in short, 'the N.D.P.S. Act') and one year's rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 500/- and in default of payment of fine further to undergo one month's rigorous imprisonment for the offence under Section 3/25 of the Indian Arms Act.2. Appellant Rewant Singh was tried by the learned Special Judge, N.D.P.S. Cases, Jodhpur, for the offences under Sections 8/17 and 18 of the N.D.P.S. Act and Section ...
Municipal Council Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-01-1994
Reported in: (1998)IIILLJ1081Raj
Y.R. Meena, J.1. By this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated July 21, 1981 (Annexure 3) whereby the establishment was directed to make compliance of the provision of the 'Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952' within a period of 10 days of receipt of this order, failing which enquiry under Section 7A of the Act would continue for assessment of the dues.2. The petitioner is a statutory body created under Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959. The petitioner is required to clean the city and preserve the health safely and convenience of the people within the limits of municipality. For this purpose the petitioner is maintaining some vehicles. The petitioner has its own workshop for repairing of the vehicles. The Respondent No.2 sent a registered notice dated October 21, 1975 asking the petitioner to deposit the charges with the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner for the months of January 1975 to July 1975 and it was further held...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›