Rajasthan Court January 1994 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Satya Dev Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-03-1994
Reported in: 1994(1)WLN48
Mohini Kapur, J. 1. In this writ petition, the termination of the services of the petitioner on the ground that he has been convicted by a court of law has been challenged. The petitioner was a teacher Gr.II. On the basis of a first information report lodged against him by his sister-in-law he was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate No. 5, Ajmer for the offence under Sections 420 and 120B IPC and sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 200/- by his judgment passed on 23rd April, 1984. On basis of this conviction, the respondents terminated his services by order dated 30th June, 1984. The petitioner preferred an appeal against his conviction made by the Magistrate and this appeal was decided by the Additional Session Judge, Ajmer on 8th November, 1985 and by this decision, the petitioner was acquitted. Thereafter he made several representations before the authorities for his re-instatement but no order was passed even after calling for the certified copy of the ...
Hanuman Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-03-1994
Reported in: 1994(1)WLN129
R.S. Verma, J.1. These two appeals, one filed by the State, and the other filed by appellant Hanuman are directed against the judgment of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Sri Ganganagar dated 4.6.1977, whereby appellant Hanuman was acquitted of charge under Section 307, I.P.C. but was convicted of offence under Section 326, I.P.C, The learned Addl. Sessions Judge found appellant Hanuman guilty of offence under Section 326, I.P.C. and sentenced him to undergo R.I. for one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 100/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo further S.I. for one month.2. In the State Appeal, the principal contention is that Hanuman had fired a gun voluntarily at Smt. Ram Pyari and had caused grievous hurts to her and this firing had been done with the intention to commit murder of Ram Pyari and, therefore, Hanuman ought to have been convicted for offence under Section 307, I.P.C. and ought to have been sentenced accordingly.3. In the Appeal filed by Hanuman, the contention is...
Bhanwar Singh Vs. the Zila Parishad Sirohi and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-02-1994
Reported in: 1994(1)WLN90
B.R. Arora, J.1. The petitioner, in pursuance to the Advertisement No. 1/88, issued by the Panchayat Samiti, Reodar, district Sirohi, inviting application for appointment on the post of III Grade Teachers, applied for the same. The petitioner was selected and was given appointment on the post of III grade Teacher in the Primary School, Kaushithala on a probation for a period of two years. After completing the probation period, as his services were found sationactory, he was confirmed on the post of III Grade Teacher and continued in the service till 22-4- 93, when his services were terminated by the Vikas Adhikari, Panchayat Samiti, Sheoganj, on the ground that the Diploma in Teaching and the marks sheet thereof, obtained by the petitioner from Rani Durgwat University, Jabalpur (M.P.) were found forged as the Registrar of that University has infused that neither the marks-sheet nor the Diploma in Teaching was issued by the aforesaid University. The petitioner has challenged this order ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›