Rajasthan Court June 1993 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jagdish NaraIn Sharma and anr. Vs. Rajasthan Patrika Ltd. and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-21-1993
Reported in: (1994)IILLJ600Raj; 1994(3)WLC240
ORDERG.S. Singhvi, J. 1. The two petitioners with common name, Jagdish Narain Sharma, have jointly filed this revision petition against the order dated February 7, 1992 passed by the Additional District Judge No. 1, Kota, dismissing their appeal against the order dated December 10, 1991 passed by the Additional Munsiff and Judicial Magistrate (I), Kota (South) refusing to grant temporary injunction in their favour.2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the petitioner Jagdish Narain Sharma son of Shri Bhorelal was employed as Operator in Li-notrone Department of Rajasthan Patrika, Kota and Jagdish Narain son of Ghasi Lal was employed as Pester in the Pesting Department of Rajasthan Patrika, Kota. Both the petitioners were transferred to Bikaner and Udaipur respectively on December 7, 1991 without their consent. The plaintiffs-petitioners alleged that the order of transfer had been passed unlawfully and with mala fide intention of victimising the plaintiffs-petitioners for the...
Samai Singh Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jun-07-1993
Reported in: 1993WLN(UC)94
M.R. Calla, J.1. Shri D.P. Saraswat, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that 16 co-accused persons have already been granted bail and the present petitioner was not granted bail on the ground that allegation against him is that he had fired and it was because of his fire that Asu Khan died. Shri Saraswat has referred to the statement of Rahmat who is brother of the deceased, recorded at the time of the inquest report and according to the brother of deceased the allegation of using fire arms against Asu Khan is against the present petitioner along with Sahib and Hameed. Sahib and Hameed have already been granted bail. The petitioner is in jail since 4.4.1993. Challan has already been filed in the case. In the facts and circumstances of this case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am inclined to accept this bail application Under Section 439, Cr.P.C. to the accused-petitioner2. It. therefore, directed that accused-petitioner Samai Singh S/o Safeda, Mev, ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›