Rajasthan Court February 1993 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sangeeta Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-01-1993
Reported in: I(1993)DMC601; 1993(1)WLC278
I.S. Israni, J.1. Heard. This habeas corpus petition has been filed by one Willad alias Niranjan on behalf of Smt. Sangeeta D/0 Judawal Singh. It is submitted by Shri Ashok Verma, learned Counsel that she has been kept in Nari-Niketan against her wishes. She is 18/19 years old and thus a major. It is submitted that Anx. 1 is agreement of marriage between Willad and Mst. Sangeeta, which shows that they are living as husband and wife. It is submitted that learned Judicial Magistrate, Kama, Bharatpur vide order Anx. 3 dated 30.7.92 has wrongly confined her to Nari-Niketan. She is being married and is free to live whereever she likes. Reliance was placed on Sirajul Haque v. State of Rajasthan, 1988 (2) WLN 698.2. It is submitted by Shri O.P. Sharma, learned Government Advocate that parties are Hindu and there can be no agreement according to the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.3. We have heard both the parties at length and gone through the relevant documents. Anx. 3 dated July 30, 1992, which is...
Govind Ram Son of Hansaram Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-01-1993
Reported in: 1993WLN(UC)51
V.S. Dave, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the papers made available to me on record and the case diary concerned. FIR has been lodged by the accused Suwalal that an attempt was made for committing rape on his wife by deceased Mail Ram. A perusal of the case diary above indicate the circumstances that the villagers inflicted injuries on the person of the deceased when after he attempted rape on the wife of the accused. In this view of the matter, I am inclined to grant bail to the accused.2. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to accept this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.3. It is, therefore, ordered that the accused petitioner (s) Govind Ram Sardara, Kurda Ram and Suwalal r/o Belwad P.S. Khandala, Distt, Sikar shall be released on bail, provided each one of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/-thousand (Rs. ten thousand) with two sureties in ...
Dilip Singh and ors. Vs. Registrar, Cooperative Societies and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-01-1993
Reported in: 1993WLN(UC)40
A.K. Mathur, J.1. The petitioners by this writ petition have prayed that by an appropriate writ, order or direction the order (telegram) dated 5.4.1991 (Annex. 29) may be quashed and the respondents may be directed not to terminate the services of the petitioners from the Bank.2. All these petitioners were working as employees of the Railway Shramik Sahakari Bank Ltd. Bikaner. Their services were terminated by the telegram issued by the Registrar Cooperative Societies, Jaipur. Therefore, the petitioners have challenged this by filing this joint writ petition. It is submitted that in pursuance of the award given by the Labour Court, Bikaner dated 15.1.1990 that the strength of the staff in the Bank be increased looking to the work load of the Bank. An advertisement was issued in the news-paper dated 6.2.1991 inviting applications for the posts of L.D. Cs. and Class IV servants. The last date for submission of the application forms was 15.2.1991. The total posts of L.D. Cs. and Class IV ...
Sri Ram Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-01-1993
Reported in: 1993WLN(UC)57
Rajesh Balia, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that accused is in custody for 90 days since his arrest and, investigation has not yet been completed and no challan has been filed, therefore, he is entitled to be released on bail under the provisions of Section 167, Cr.P.C.2. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer. Though there is not dispute that even after the expiry of 90 days since detention of the accused, the investigation has not yet been completed, but he contends that provisions of Section 167, Cr.P.C. are not applicable to investigations under the N.D.P.S. Act. He relies on Jarin Khan v. State of Rajasthan 1992 Cr. LR. (Raj.) 723.3. As against this, learned Counsel for the petitioner relied on two decisions of this Court reported in 1993 Cr. LR (Raj.) 8 (Phool Chand v. State of Rajasthan) and 1990(2) RLR 284 (Him Ram and Anr. v. State of Raj); wherein this Cour...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›