Rajasthan Court February 1992 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nagar Parishad Karmchari Union Vs. the Municipal Council and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-11-1992
Reported in: 1992(1)WLN265
Rajesh Balia, J.1. This petition was filed on 19.10.1989 by Nagar Parishad Karrtichari Union, Jodhpur (hereinafter referred to as 'the Union') on behalf of 24 employees designated as Safaiwala, working in the Municipal Council, Jodhpur. Names of these 24 employees, mentioned in Schedule 'A' appended with petition, are as under:1. Kamla D/o Shri Ratan Lal 2. Vimla D/o Bansiram3. Gita S/o Arjun4. Geeta D/o Dhanraj 5. Punamchand s/o Shri Sultan6. Budharam s/o Shri Sultan7. Surender s/o Shri Hardas8. Sarla D/o Shri Prakash9. Leela D/o Shri Gabru 10. Narendra s/o Shri Hardas11. Harish s/o Shri Nathuram12. Pappu s/o Shri Hardas13. Narma s/o Shri Sagji14. Omprakash s/o Shri Mangilal15. Pushpa D/o Bhaiyaram16. Shanti D/o Sugnaram17. Raju s/o Shri shyamlal18. Nandkishore s/o Shri Ramdeen19. Manakram s/o Shri Punaram20. Sushila D/o Shri Banshiram21. Harculish s/o Shri silram22. Sharwan s/o Shri Chhotuji 23. Rameshwari D/o Bhanwarlal 24. Jagdish s/o Shri Messaram.2. It is alleged that by oral ord...
Arjun Singh Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-11-1992
Reported in: 1992(1)WLN181
Kanta Bhatnagar, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated October 31,1979 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, No. 2, Hanumangarh by which appellant Arjun Singh was held guilty under sections 326 and 324 IPC and sentenced to 1 1/2 years Rl on the first count and 6 months Rl on the second count.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that Kor Singh complainant has given his land admeasuring 11/2 kills for wheat cultivation to Arjun Singh appellant. In lieu of that Arjun Singh and his son Nakshtra Singh were to look the field of Kor Singh. On March 26, 1978 at 9-9.15 p.m. there was turn of water of Kor Singh. At 9.00 p.m. Kor Singh went to the house of Arjun Singh and called him out. He was informed by Arjun Singh's wife and children that he had gone to the field for irrigation. Kor Singh went to the field. In the way he met Arjun Singh and his son Nakshtra Singh at a distance of 1 killa from his field. He told them that it is time for irrigation and why were they ...
B.T.C. Utirna Sangh Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-11-1992
Reported in: 1992(1)WLN204
Rajesh Balia, J.1. Petitioner is an Association of persons who hold qualification of Basic Training Course. Petition has been filed for the benefit of the persons, named in the Schedule attached with the writ petition. The persons named in the Schedule have obtained B.T.C. certificate from Bihar Pradesh Shiksha Parishad, Sripalpur on different dates but all prior to 13th October, 1987 upto which date the certificate was recognised as equivalent to B.S.T.C. for eligibility for appointment on the post of Gr. Ill teacher in Rajasthan. With effect from 13th Oct. 1987, the Certificate, issued by the aforesaid Parishad has been de-recognised for the purposes of considering eligibility of its holder for appointment as Teacher Gr. III. It is contended that this Court has taken a view in number of cases more particularly in [i) D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2859/87 Hari Ram v. State of Raj. decided on 25.4.88, (ii) D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 841 /88 Rakshpal Ram v. State of Raj. decided on 7.9...
Ahmed Khan Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-11-1992
Reported in: 1992(1)WLN246
Kanta Bhatnagar, J.1. Appellant Ahmed Khan was tried for the charges under Section 5(1)(d)(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 161 of the Indian Penal Code by the Special Judge, Anti Corruption Cases, Bikaner. Vide judgment dated January 18,1980 the appellant was convicted for the charges and sentenced to R.I. for one year and a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine to undergo three months R.I. on the first count and R.I. for six months and a fine of Rs. 200/-, in default of payment of fine to undergo R.I. for one month on the second count.2. The facts of the case as disclosed in the First Information Report Ex,P/7 filed by Abdul Hakim on June 29,1977, before the Deputy Superintendent of Police, (Anti Corruption) Bikaner are that, he i.e. the complainant had constructed a varandah without permission. That, while construction was going oh appellant Ahmed Khan posing to be the Jamadar of Municipal Council, demanded money as bribe so that he may get the matter se...
Atteque Ali Vs. Zubberiya Tibbiya College and 46 ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-10-1992
Reported in: 1992(1)WLN211
B.R. Arora, J.1. These three writ petitions relate to the functioning, management and affiliation of Zubberiya Tibbiya College, Jodhpur, and raise a common question of fact and law and, therefore, they are being decided by this common judgment. With an object to establish an institution to impart education in Yunani Medicines and to treat the patients by Yunani methods of medicines, Zubberiya Tibbiya Trust, Jodhpur, was created, which was registered on February 6, 1980. The Trust, also, established and started a college, known as Zubberiya Tibbiya College, Jodhpur, with a view to imparting knowledge of education in Yunani Medicines. Abdul Rashid and Mohammed Ramjan were the two Authors of the Trust. By the said deed of Trust, Maulvi Astfaaq Hussain, Abdul Rashid, Maulvi Sayyed Hussain Bukhari, Mohammed Umar and Mohammed Ramjan Kadri were appointed as the Trustees. The trustees got the Zubberiya Tibbiya College affiliated with the Board of Indian Medicines, Rajasthan Jaipur, and after t...
Kanhaiya Lal Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-10-1992
Reported in: 1991(2)WLC713; 1992(1)WLN120
B.R. Arora, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated March 26, 1987, passed by the Sessions Judge, Udaipur, by which the earned Sessions Judge convicted and sentenced the accused-appellant for the offences under Sections 302 and 394 I.P.C.2. The appellant was tried by the learned Sessions Judge, Udaipur, for the offences under Sections 302 and 394 I.P.C. The case of the prosecution, as unfolded in the First Information Report, which was lodged at Police Station, Patasiya on April 23, 1985, by Poona, is to the effect that Smt. Moi - the wife of the informant Poona, a day before yesterday, showed her intention to go to her parental house situated in village Lakhawas, upon which the informant asked her to go by the first bus. In the night, at about 10.00/11.00 p.m., he went to his field in order to keep a watch on the crop and when he came back to the house yesterday at about 10.00 a.m., his wife was not found at the house He thought that she might have gone to her parental...
Alka Dabi and ors. Vs. Prem Prakash Dabi and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-10-1992
Reported in: 1992(1)WLN128
B.R. Arora, J.1. These three appeals arise out of the judgment dated July 9, 1990. passed by the Judge, Family Court, Jodhpur.2. Smt. Shanti Dabi W/o Prem Prakash Dabi and the mother and natural guardian of Miss Alka Dabi, Kavindra Dabi and Himanshu Dabi, on May 26, 1989, filed three applications under Section 125 Cr. PC. in the Court of the Judge, Family Court, Jodhpur, for the grant of the maintenance to her minor sons and daughter. The case, as set-up in the applications, is that Smt. Shanti Devi Dabi was married to Prem Prakash Dabi on April 21, 1969, and out of this wed-lock, Ravindra was born on July 28, 1973, Miss Alka was born on Sept. 6, 1974 and Himanshu was born on May 30,1979. It was averred in these applications that the non-petitioner Prem Prakash Dabi treated their mother Smt. Shanti Dabi with gruelity and filed an application for judicial separation on flimsy grounds in the court of the learned District Judge, Jodhpur. He has, also, kept one mistress-Bunder by name and ...
Ashiq and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-10-1992
Reported in: 1992(1)WLN113
B.R. Arora, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated July 4, 1988, passed by the Sessions Judge, Bikaner, by which the learned Sessions Judge1 convicted and sentenced the accused-appellant Ashiq under Sections 148, 302, 323 read with Section 149 I.P.C., accused Yusuf and Alladeeta under Sections 147, 326 read with Sections 149 and 323 I.P.C., and the remaining accused-appellants Kalu, Haji Khan and Phalaksher under Sections 147, 326 read with Sections 149 and 323 read with Section 149 I.P.C.2. The accused-appellants were tried by the learned Sessions Judge, Bikaner, for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 I.P.C. The prosecution case as unfolded in the First Information Report, lodged at Police Station, Chhattargarh by Lukman S/o Ajmera, is that at about one month before, Subhan's herd entered into the field of accused Ashiq, on which some quarrel took place, but ultimately the matter was compromised and the catties were not given in the cattle pond. Thereaf...
Smt. Puspha Vs. Mahendra
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-10-1992
Reported in: 1992(1)WLN130
B.R. Arora, J.1. This appeal is directed against the order dated August 16, 1990, passed by the Judge, Family Court, Jodhpur, by which the learned Judge of the Family Court dismissed the application under Section 125 Cr. P.C, filed by Smt. Puspha for the grant of the maintenance from her step-son.2. Smt. Puspha-the step mother of Shri Mahendra-filed an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for the grant of maintenance. It was averred in the application that she was married to deceased Pusha Ram-the father of defendant Mahendra. Mahendra has two minor brothers and one minor sister. Mahendra has inherited several movable and immovable properties from his father deceased Pusha Ram. Pusha Ram died on August 22,1982, and all the properties of Pusha Ram has been taken-over by Mahendra and after the death of Pusha Ram, the treatment of her in-laws was not cordial and, therefore, she had to leave the house of her in-law in the year 1984, and since then she is living with her brother. She has n...
Sohan Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-10-1992
Reported in: 1992(1)WLN135
B.R. Arora, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated December 21, 1983, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Hanumangarh, by which the learned Additional Sessions Judge convicted and sentenced the accused-appellants.2. Accused-appellant Sohan Singh was tried by the learned Sessions Judge No. 2 Hanumangarh, for the offences under Sections 302 and 452 I.P.C and under Section 27 of the Indian Arms Act. Accused- appellants Sarwan Singh and Banta Singh were tried for the offences under Sections 302/34, 114, 323 and 452 I.P.C. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, after trial, convicted accused Sohan Singh for the offences under Sections 302 and 452 I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Indian Arms Act and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 5000/- and in default of payment of fine further to undergo two years' rigorous imprisonment under Section 302 I.P.C., under Section 27 of the Indian Arms Act, he was sentenced to undergo two years' rigorous ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »