Rajasthan Court January 1991 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kheewa Ram Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-23-1991
Reported in: 1991(1)WLN164
B.R. Arora, J.1. This miscellaneous petition is directed against the order dated November 7, 1987, passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sojat, by which the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance against the petitioner Under Sections 467 and 420 I.P.C.2. Nand Kishore, Branch Magager of the Marwar Gramin Bank, Jadan, lodged a First Information Report with the Station House Officer, Police Station, Shivpura, Under Sections 406 and 420 I.P.C. The police, after necessary investigation, submitted the report, mentioning therein that no case against the accused, Under Sections 406 and 420 I.P.C, is made-out, but according to the police, the case Under Section 467 I.P.C is prima facie made-out against the accused. The learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sojat, by his order dated November 7, 1987, after taking into consideration the papers on record, took cognizance against the petitioner Under Sections 467 and 420 I.P.C. It is against this order that the present petiti...
Kashi Ram Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-23-1991
Reported in: 1991(1)WLN145
B.R. Arora, J.1. This miscellaneous petition is directed against the order dated December 11, 1989, passed by the Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Bhadra, by which the learned Magistrate sent the case relating to F.I.R. No. 121 of 1985 for further investigation to the police.2. Sukhpal Singh, Supervisor, Bhadra Kraya Vikraya Sahkari Samiti, Bhadra, submitted a report on June 21, 1985, at the Police Station, Bhadra, for embezzlement of a sum of Rs. 34,795/- against Aad Ram, Kashi Ram and Bharat Singh. On the basis of this complaint, First Information Report No. 121 of 1985 was registered Under Section 408 I.P.C. against these accused-persons. The investigation in this case was conducted by the C.I.D., C.B, Cooperative Embezzlement Section, Bikaner Range, Bikaner. The police, after necessary investigation, submitted a challan against Aad Ram, Kashi Ram and Bharat Singh in the Court of the Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Bhadra. The learned Magistrate, after considering the report submitte...
Arun Singh Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-23-1991
Reported in: 1991(1)WLN159
B.R. Arora, J.1. This miscellaneous petition is directed against the order dated August 17, 1990, passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bikaner, directing the petitioner to appear in person if he wants to contest the case.2. Labour Inspector, Shops and Commercial Establishment Act, filed a complaint against the petitioner in the Court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bikaner, for offence Under Section 12/33 and Section 4 of the Rajasthan Shops and Commercial Establishment Act and Under Rules 22(10) and 25 of the Rajasthan Shops and Commercial Establishment Rules. The learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, by his order dated April 6, 1989, issued special Summons to the accused as the offences were petty in nature and directed that the accused may appear in person or through his Advocate in the Court if he wants to contest the case. The counsel for the petitioner appeared on August 17, 1990, in the Court after the service of the Special summon on the peti...
Hem Chandra Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-23-1991
Reported in: 1991(1)WLN149
B.R. Arora, J.1. This miscellaneous petition is directed against the order dated July 5, 1988, passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Udaipur, by which the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate framed the charges Under Sections 420/34 and 406/34, I.P.C. against the petitioner.2. Mr. Banshi Lai filed a written report at the Police Station, Surajpole, Udaipur, against the petitioner Under Sections 420, 406, 120B, 408 and 409/34, I.P.C. The police, after necessary investigation, presented the challan against the petitioner Under Sections 420, 406, 120B, 408 and 409/34, I.P.C. in the Court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Udaipur. The learned Judicial Magistrate took cognizance and issued process and thereafter heard the arguments for framing the charge. After hearing the arguments, the learned Judicial Magistrate framed the charges against the petitioner Under Section 420/34 and 406/34, I.P.C. It is against this order that the present petition h...
Dhan Raj Vs. the State of Rajasthan and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-23-1991
Reported in: 1991(1)WLN138
B.R. Arora, J.1. This miscellaneous petition is directed against the order dated June 21, 1989, passed by the Sessions Judge, Churu, in Criminal Revision Petition No.140 of 1986, by which the learned Sessions Judge dismissed the revision petition filed by the petitioner.2. Smt. Radha Devi filed a complaint against the petitioner Under Section 498A, I.P.C. in the Court of the Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Sujangarh. The learned Judicial Magistrate, by his order dated January 4, 1989, took cognizance against the petitioner Under Section 498A, I.P.C and issued process. Dissatisfied with the order dated January 4, 1986. passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate taking the cognizance against the petitioner, the petitioner preferred a revision petition before the learned Sessions Judge, Churu, who, by his order dated June 21, 1989, dismissed the revision petition filed by the petitioner. It is against this order that the present petition Under Section 482 Cr. P.C. has been fil...
Kaliyan Singh Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-23-1991
Reported in: 1991(1)WLN167
B.R. Arora, J.1. This miscellaneous petition is directed against the order dated October 22, 1986, passed by the Sessions Judge Jalore, by which the learned Sessions Judge dismissed the revision petition filed by the petitioner.2. Bhoor Singh Purohit on August 28, 1978, filed a written complaint before the Superintendent of Police, Jalore, to the effect that Kaliyan Singh, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Santhu, falsely signing himself or by getting it signed by some other person the application form for allotment of land on behalf of his minor son War Singh, presented the same before the Tehsildar, Jalore, and got allotment in favour of War Singh by the Committee, in which he himself was a member. He got this land allotted in his minor son's name on May 31, 1978. A complaint was made against the allotment but he again made an application for allotment of land in the name of his minor son War Singh by getting it signed by himself or through any other person and presented the application befo...
Smt. Zubeda Vs. the Stale of Rajasthan and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-23-1991
Reported in: 1991(1)WLN162
B.R. Arora, J.1. This miscellaneous petition is directed against the order dated March 6, 1990, passed by the Additional Civil Judge cum Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jodhpur, by which the learned Magistrate took cognizance against the petitioner Under Section 498 I.P.C.2. Smt. Parveen filed a complaint against Abdul Sakoor, Mst. Jubeda, Abdul Kayoom, Abdul Aziz and Mst. Amlurahim in the Court of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Jodhpur, Under Sections 323,406,420,120B and 498A I.P.C. and Section 4 of the Prohibition of Dowry Act. The learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Jodhpur, sent this complaint to the Police Station, Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur, for investigation, Under Section 156 Cr.P.C. The police, after necessary investigation, presented the challan only against Abdul Sakoor Under Section 4981.P.C. and regarding the others, the police was of the opinion that no case is made-out against them. The complainant filed a protest petition and after heari...
Smt. Sajjan Kanwar Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-23-1991
Reported in: 1991(1)WLN139
B.R. Arora, J.1. This miscellaneous petition is directed against the order dated March 8, 1990, passed by the additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No. 3, Jodhpur, by which the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate rejected the application of the petitioner for dispensing with the personal attendance of the petitioner.2. Asgar Ali filed a complaint against the petitioner and Davendra Singh in the Court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No. 3, Jodhpur, who recorded the statement of complainant Under Section 202 Cr. P.C. and by his order dated February 10, 1988, took cognizance against the petitioner and issued process. The Court summoned the petitioner by bailable warrant. On October 5, 1989, an application was moved by the petitioner that she is 75 years of age and is suffering from hypertention, diabeties etc. and is unable to move. In support of it, the medical certificate was, also, produced. It was, also, mentioned in the application that she is a 'PARDANASIN' lady ...
The State of Rajasthan Vs. Vishnu Dutt and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-23-1991
Reported in: 1991(1)WLN148
B.R. Arora, J.1. This leave to appeal is directed against the judgment dated January 5, 1990, passed by the Additional Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Sri Ganganagar, by which the learned Additional Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Sri Ganganagar, allowed the parties to compromise the matter.2. Heard learned Public Prosecutor and the learned Counsel for the non-petitioners, and perused the order passed by the Court below and the relevant record.3. After going through the judgment and the record of the case, I am of the opinion that no illegality has been committed by the learned lower Court in passing the order dated January 5, 1990. The order passed by the learned lower Court cannot be said to be in any way, perverse and it does not require any interference.4. The result is that the Leave to Appeal, filed by the State, is dismissed and the leave prayed-for is refused....
Chiman Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-23-1991
Reported in: 1991(1)WLN150
B.R. Arora, J.1. This miscellaneous petition is direted against the order dated August 1, 1990, passed by the Sessions Judge, Balotra, by which the learned Sessions Judge framed charges Under Section 307, I.P.C. and Section 51(2) of the Rajasthan Forest Act against the petitioner.2. A complaint was lodged on December 29, 1989, against the petitioner at Police Station Sindri, by one Khinv Singh and on the basis of this report, a case Under Sections 307, 353 and 332/34, I.P.C. and Section 42/77 of the Forest Act was registered. The police, after necessary investigation, presented the challan against the petitioners Under Sections 307, 353 and 332/34, I.P.C. and Section 42/77 of the Forest Act, in the Court of the Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Balotra, who committed the accused to stand trial in the Court of the learned Sessions Judge, Balotra. The learned Sessions Judge, by his order dated August 1, 1990, framed the charges Under Section 307, I.P.C. and Section 51(2) of the Rajasthan F...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »