Rajasthan Court April 1990 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
indra Chand Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-23-1990
Reported in: 1990(2)WLN37
Kanta Bhatnagar, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 25-9-1985 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Nonar, by which appellant Indra Cband was convicted Under Section 302, IPC and sentenced to imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of pay-meat to rigorous imprisonment of six months.2 Briefly stated, the prosecution case is that on 11-9-1982 at 12.30 a.m. appellant Indra Cband made a report at Police Station, Rawatsar to the effect that his father Phoosa Ram has one brother Bansbidhar who had two sons viz Ratan aged 22 years and Jagdish aged 18 years. The houses, agricultural land and shop of Phoosaram and Banshidhar were joint. Bansbidhar mostly remained ill and his wife was blind. Jagdish and Ratan were for the last few months insisting upon partition and as such it occurred to him (the appellant) that if Jagdish and Ratan were done away with, the whole property would remain with his family. That, in the main market of Rawatsar, there was a hotel...
Sadda Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-23-1990
Reported in: 1990(2)WLN49
Kanta Bhatnagar, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated March 15/16, 1985 by which appellants Sadda Singh, Sagad Singh, Makhan Singh, Gurpal Singh and Malkiyat Singh were held guilty for forming an unlawful assembly and committing the murder of Jeet Singh. They were all sentenced to one year's rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 100/- in default to undergo 15 days simple imprisonment each Under Section 147 IPC; five years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 100/-, in default to undergo 15 day's simple imprisonment each Under Section 449, IPC and imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default to undergo two months simple imprisonment each Under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC Appellant Malkiyat Singh was also convicted Under Section 148 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act and was sentence to one year's rigorous imprisonment on the first count and one year's rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 200/-, in default to one month's simple imprisonme...
In Re: Indo Continental Hotels and Resorts Ltd.;
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-20-1990
Reported in: [1990]69CompCas93(Raj); [1990]185ITR38(Raj)
M.B. Sharma, J.1. Company Petitions Nos. 4 of 1988 and 5 of 1988 have been filed by Indo Continental Hotels and Resorts Ltd. (for short, 'the transferee-company') and Hotel Pink City Pvt. Ltd. (for short, 'transferor-company') under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short, 'the Act'), read with Rule 57 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 (for short, 'the Rules'), and Company Petition No. 14 of 1988 has been filed jointly by both the transferee and transferor-companies under Sections 391 and 394 of the Act and it has been prayed that a scheme of amalgamation of the two companies, namely, the transferee and transferor-companies be sanctioned.2. The transferee-company was incorporated under the provisions of the Act on May 2, 1970, in the name of S. B. Properties and Enterprises Ltd. However, with effect from December 11, 1982, the name of the transferee-company has been changed to Indo Continental Hotels and Resorts Ltd. The registered office of the transferee-company is situa...
Hari Prasad Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-17-1990
Reported in: (1995)IIILLJ600Raj
I.S. Israni, J.1. This writ petition has been filed with a prayer that the petitioner may be allowed to continue on the post of driver with all.consequential benefits.2. It is submitted by Mr. R.S. Mehta, learned counsel, that petitioner is working in substantive capacity on post of Cleaner and was asked to render the services of the Driver from August 18, 1983 and was assigned the job of driving heavy vehicles. A copy of order in this respect (Annex. 1) dated April 25, 1984 has been placed on record. The driving licence of heavy vehicles has been filed and marked as Anx. 2. It is pointed out that since the petitioner was not paid the emoluments of a driver, a D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 910/88 was filed in this Court by the petitioner, which was disposed of on December 22, 1988, by which the petition was allowed and it iwas directed that the petitioner.be paid the minimum basic salary of the post of driver from March, 1985 on the principle of 'equal wages for equal work'. It is furth...
Management, Hindustan Machine Tools Ltd. Vs. Judge, Labour Court and a ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-17-1990
Reported in: (1992)ILLJ494Raj
I.S. Israni, J.1. The Management, Hindustan Machine Tools Ltd., Ajmer has filed this writ petition against the award dated September 21, 1988, passed by the Judge, Labour Court, Jaipur, in Reference Case No. ICR 157/83, which was published on December 28, 1988.2. An application dated December 17, 1989 under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short, 'the Act') has been filed on behalf of the respondent No. 2 -- the workman, praying that a direction be given to the petitioner to make the payment of last drawn wages to him from the date when the writ proceedings were initiated/filed before this Court.In the application, in para No. 5, it has been stated that the respondent No. 2 - workman, prior to the award, was not employed in any other Industrial Establishment nor he is now gainfully employed in any Industrial Establishment, after the passing of the award till date. An affidavit in support of this application has also been filed.3. A reply to this application has bee...
Bank of Baroda Vs. Nandkishore Kachhwaha
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-16-1990
Reported in: AIR1991Raj151
1. This is a first appeal by defendant Bank of Baroda against the decree of the Additional District Judge No. 5, Jaipur City dated August 4, 1988 decreeing the suit of the plaintiff-respondent for ejectment of the appellant from the demised premises detailed and described in para 3 read with para I of the plaint.2. Plaintiff-respondent Nand Kishore Kachhwaha instituted Civil Original Unit No. 264 of 1980 against the appellant Bank of Baroda with the averments that plaintiffs father Nar Singh Kachawah had constructed, during his life-time, a house property on Plot No. 8-32 bearing House No. 2J-45 located on Arvind Marg, Mirsa Ismail Road, Jaipur, Nar Singh Kachawa in his life time partitioned this house property in the year 1974 between his six sons and wife as a result of which the southerneastern portion of the house, which is triangular in shape, came to the share of the plaintiff-respondent. Mr. K.C. Bakiwala, who was Regional Manager of Bank of Baroda, was a friend of Nar Singh Kac...
Jangir Singh and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-12-1990
Reported in: 1990WLN(UC)447
A.K. Mathur, J.1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 2nd of February, 1988 passed by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Sri Ganganagar by which appellant Jangir Singh was convicted Under Section 302, IPC and sentenced to imprisonment for life, and appellant Ninder Singh was convicted Under Section 302 read with Section 34, IPC and sentenced to imprisonment for life.2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case leading to the trial of the appellants and the present appeal are that when on 11.9.1986 at about 4 or 5 a.m. Ameer Singh, deceased alongwith his wife Taro Bai (PW 1), son Pala Singh (PW 2) and daughter Jaggro was sleeping outside his house, the two appellants came to him and asked him to accompany them. On his asking why they wanted him to accompany them, he was told that he may take the bicycle from his house. Despite Taro Bai asking him not to go, Ameer Singh accompanied Jangir Singh and Ninder Singh and went to the diggi outside the house of the ap...
Shanker Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-10-1990
Reported in: 1990(1)WLN626
Sobhagmal Jain, J.1. This is a second bail application filed on behalf of the petitioner. The first bail application was dismissed, as not pressed, on March 23, 1990, Liberty was, how ever, given at that time to the petitioner to move a fresh bail application after one month. Although, the period of one month is not over, the petitioner has moved the present petition and his counsel submits that now that the challan has been filed and the accusations made do sot, in no way, make out a case Under Section 304A, IPC, the petitioner be enlarged on bail as he has already been in custody for about two months. Learned Counsel for the petitioner also gives an under taking on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner shall not drive any vehicle and will not obtain the licence seized by the police during the pendency of the trial.2. Having regard to the circumstances of the case and the fact that the accused has been in jail for about two months and that he will not drive any vehicle to avoid...
State of Rajasthan Vs. Kishan Lal
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-09-1990
Reported in: 1991ACJ546
N.C. Kochhar, J.1. The facts giving rise to the appeal and the cross-objections against the award dated December' 17, 1985, passed by Mr. Jagat Singh, Judge, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Kota, are as under:On the morning of 7th April, 1982, at about 9.30 a.m., respondent Kishan Lal was going on scooter at Gumanpura Road near Poolia at Kota. At that time jeep, bearing No. RRR 8750, which was owned by the appellant No. 1, State of Rajasthan and was being driven by Vishnu Dutt, driver, came from the opposite direction and there was an accident between the scooter and the jeep. Respondent fell down from the scooter. In the accident his left foot was fractured and he also received some abrasion injuries on the foot. He became unconscious and was removed to the hospital by AW 2, R.R Kapur. In the hospital Dr. Y.K. Sharma examined the respondent. The respondent remained admitted in the hospital for about 8 days and thereafter he took rest at his residence. He filed a petition claiming a s...
Shri Subendu Dixit and ors. Vs. the Rajasthan Agriculture University a ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-09-1990
Reported in: 1990(2)WLN512
Jasraj Chopra, J.1. These six writ petitions arise out of the same order dated 3rd/7th July 1989 passed by the Controller of Examinations, Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner where by the Board of Management of the Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner has confirmed this punishment of current examinations cancelled imposed against the petitioners for using unfair means in the examinations of 1988.2. The facts necessary to be noticed for the disposal of this writ petition briefly, stated are: that the academic career of the petitioners is meritorious. They have secured first Division marks in all public examinations in which they appeared and, therefore, they took entrance test of PMT/PVT for the purpose of degree course of BVSC & Animal Husbandary in the then Mohan Lal Sukhadiya University, Udaipur They were successful and were admitted. They passed their first year examinations of the BVSC and Animal Husbandary degree course from the Mohan Lal Sukhadiya University of Udaip...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »