Rajasthan Court December 1990 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Purkha Ram and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-18-1990
Reported in: 1990(2)WLN429
R.S. Verma, J.1. Learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Nagaur exercising jurisdiction in the court of Sessions Merta has convicted appcllants-Purkha Ram, Mega Ram, Amra Ram, Hema Ram, Moola Ram S/o Dana Ram, Chunna Ram, Rewat Ram. Moola Ram S/o Baga Ram, Bhika Ram, Sona Ram, Anna Ram, Mohan Ram, Dhira Ram, Jeewan Ram and Poosa Ram for offences Under Section 302 read with Section 149, 307 read with Section 149, Section 325 read with Section 149 and Section 323.I.P.C. He has further convicted appellants Anna Ram, Bhika Ram and Moola Ram S/o Dana for offence Under Section 148, I.P.C. All other appellants have been convicted for offence Under Section 147, I.P.C. Appellant Anna Ram has been further convicted of offence Under Section 7 of the Civil Rights Protection Act while appellants Jeewan Ram, Poosa Ram, Dhira Ram and Mohan Ram have been convicted for offence Under Section 4 of the aforesaid Act. All the appellants have been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 10...
Abdul Hamid Vs. Mst. Asia
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-17-1990
Reported in: I(1992)DMC522; 1990(2)WLN587; 1990WLN(UC)195
B.R. Arora, J.1. This revision petition is against the judge at dated July,26 1989, passed by the Session Judge, in Merta in Criminal Revision No. 24 of 1984, arising out of the order dated May 24, 1984, passed by the Munsiff and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Merta.2. Mst. Asia was married to Abdul Hamid, who divorced her on May 29, 1970. After her divorce, Mst Asia moved an application under Section 125, Cr. PC. for grant of maintenance to her. That application, filed by Mst. Asia was allowed by the learned Munsiff and Judicial Magistrate, Merta, by his order dated May 16.1970. The learned Magistrate awarded Rs. 75/- per month as the maintenance to Mst. Asia Disatisfied with the order passed by the learned Munsiff and Judicial Magistrate First Class, Merta, allowing the maintenance allowance of Rs. 75/- per month, Abdul Hamid filed a revision petition before the learned Sessions Judge, Merta, and the learned Sessions Judge, Merta, by his order dated July 23. 1979, partly allowed t...
Salma Banoo Vs. Mohd. Rafiq and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-17-1990
Reported in: 1990(2)WLN274
B.R. Arora, J.1. These two criminal miscellaneous petitions are directed against the order dated December 14, 1989, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chittorgarh, in Criminal Revision No. 46 of 1987, arising out of the order dated August 7,1987, passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chittorgarh granting maintenance.2. The wife Mst. Salma Banoo filed an application Under Section 125, Cr. PC in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chittorgarh, for the grant of maintenance to herself as well as to her daughter Sahana Bano This application, filed Under Section 125, Cr. PC was allowed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate and the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, by his order dated October 27, 1984, granted the maintenance of Rs. 300/- per month both for the wife and her daughter Sahana Banoo. This maintenance was allowed with effect from February 9, 1983, i.e., from the date of the application. Dissatisfied with the order passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate...
Devi Singh Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-17-1990
Reported in: 1990(2)WLN578
B.R. Arora, J.1. This miscellaneous petition is directed against the order dated December 22, 1987, passed by the Sessions Judge, Pali, in Criminal Revision No. 60 of 1983, arising out of the order dated May 16, 1983, passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Pali, by which the learned Magistrate framed the charges Under Section 419, IPC against the petitioner.2. The incident, which led to the prosecution of the petitioner, took place on August 2, 1975, and the First Information Report of this incident was lodged at the Police Station, Pali, on August 8, 1975. It is alleged in the First Information Report that on August 2, 1975, a type-test for appointment on the post of Typist cum Clerk was held in the Office of the District and Sessions Judge, Pali, in which the petitioner impersonating himself as Bhanwar Singh and Alok Kumar, appeared on their befall' in the said type-test. On basis of this report, the police, after necessary investigation, presumed the challan against the petitioner, Bhan...
Amar Lal Udhani Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-17-1990
Reported in: 1990WLN(UC)225
B.R. Arora, J.1. This miscellaneous petition Under Section 482, Cr. P.C. is directed against the order dated February 1,1987, passed by the Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Gulabpura, by which the learned Magistrate framed charges Under Section 379, I.P.C. and Section 39 of the Indian Electricity Act, against the petitioner.2. The petitioner was working as the Assistant Engineer on April 21, 1983 in the Rajasthan State Electricity Board and was posted at Hurda. On April 22, 1983, an information was received in the Office of the petitioner that M/s. Jagetiya Paper Mills, Roopa Hilli, has unauthorisedly connected its transformer form 11 K.V. Line, charged the transformer and is using electricity for heavy motors in the mill without any meter. On receiving this information, the site was inspected by the petitioner alongwith Shri Vinod Kumar Lumba, Executive Engineer, and Shri Naresh Jain, Assistant Engineer, Hurda, and the report was found to be correct. As M/s. Jagetiya Paper...
Hindustan Zinc Limited Vs. Commercial Taxes Officer
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-17-1990
Reported in: 1990WLN(UC)220
B.R. Arora, J.1. In these three revision petitions, preferred Under Section 15(1) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, against the order dated December 4, 1987, passed by the Rajasthan Sales Tax Tribunal, Ajmer, the question that arises for the determination is : whether the sales effected during the Assessment Years 1978-79, 1979-80 and 1980-81 by the assessee M/s. Hindustan Zinc. Limited, Udaipur, in respect of tender-forms would be exigible for the sales tax?2. The petitioner-assessee is a registered dealer under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act and deals in the nonferrous items. It is, also, a manufacturer of these items. For the purpose of purchase of different items, the assessee under to give advertisement in the papers with the statement that desirous suppliers may submit their tenders. The tender-forms were given by the assessee-petitioner at the cost ranging between Rs. 25/-to Rs. 1000/-to the desirous suppliers. Such cost of the tender-forms was received by the assessee during the rel...
Om Prakash Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-17-1990
Reported in: 1990WLN(UC)189
B.R. Arora, J.1. This miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the proceedings pending before the Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Sri Ganganagar. The sole ground raised by the petitioner for quashing the proceedings is that there is inordinate delay in completing the trial and the proceedings are pending for about ten years and the prolonging of the trial is without any fault on the part of the petitioner. This prolongation of the trial amounts to persecution of the petitioner and he, therefore, prayed that the proceedings should be quashed.2. The complaint was filed by one Shri Ram Niwas on December 12, 1980 Under Sections 420 and 406, I.P.C. against the petitioner in the Court of the Additional Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Sri Ganganagar. The learned Magistrate sent the complaint Under Section 156(3) Cr. P.C. to the police for further investigation and the police, after necessary investigation, presented a challan in the Court of the Additional Munsif a...
Ashok Mehta and ors. Vs. Amrik Singh and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-17-1990
Reported in: 1990WLN(UC)185
B.R. Arora, J.1. This miscellaneous petition is directed against the order dated December 1, 1984, passed by the learned Additional Munsif and Judicial Magistrate (South), Udaipur, by which the learned Magistrate took the cognizance against the petitioners.2. The complainant Amrik Singh filed a complaint Under Sections 420 and 406, I.P.C. against the petitioners in the Court of the Additional Munsif and Judicial Magistrate (South), Udaipur, on November 12, 1984, alleging therein that in the month of January, 1979, the accused-respondents (who are petitioners in this case) came to his office, situated at 24-C, Pratapnagar, and showed their intention to purchase the soapstone and it was agreed between them that the complainant will sent two trucks of soapstone to them, which will remain as his property on security with them and the accused, after selling the soap stone, will send the amount of the sale price to the complainant. In prusuance to this undertaking, the complainant, on Januar...
Salma Bano Vs. Mohammed Rafiq and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-17-1990
Reported in: 1991(1)WLN402
B.R. Arora, J.1. These two criminal miscellaneous petitions are directed against the order dated December 14, 1989, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chittorgarh, in Criminal Revision Petition No. 46 of 1987, arising out of the order dated August 7, 1987 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chittorgarh granting maintenance.2. The wife Mst. Salma Banoo filed an application Under Section 125, Cr.P.C. in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chittorgarh, for the grant of maintenance to herself as well as to her daughter Sahana Bano. This application, filed Under Section 125, Cr. P.C. was allowed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate and the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, by his order dated October 27,1984, granted the maintenance of Rs. 300/- per month both for the wife and her daughter Sahana Bano. This maintenance was allowed with effect from February 9,1983, i.e., from the date of the application. Dissatisfied with the order passed by the learned Chief Judicial ...
Tulsi Ram Vs. Smt. Paro Bai
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-17-1990
Reported in: 1991(1)WLN531
Petition Partly Allowed.B.R. Arora, J.1. This petition Under Section 482, Cr. PC is directed against the order dated January 10,1990, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Raisinghnagar, in criminal revision No. 14 of 1989 (Paro Bai v. The State of Rajasthan and Anr.) and Criminal Revision petition No. 18 of 1989 (Tulsi Ram v. Paro Bai).2. Smt. Paro Bai filed an application Under Section 125, Cr. PC for grant of maintenance against the petitioner Tulsi Ram in the Court of the Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Anoopgarh. The notice of his petition was given to the petitioner. The applicant-non-petitioner Smt. Paro Bai, in support of her case, produced hereself as AW 1, Fakir Chand AW 2, Prem Das AW 3 and Wazir Chand AW 4. The petitioner-non-applicant Tulsi Ram produced himself as NAW 1 Gurbachansing NAW 2 and Mahendrasingh NAW 3. The learned trial Court, after consider the evidence on record, came to the conclusion that as the petitioner and his other relatives treating he...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »